Cited by 65Genetic and Environmental Crop StudiesAgricultural pest management studiesAgricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement

Mapping patterns of abiotic and biotic stress resilience uncovers conservation gaps and breeding potential of vigna wild relatives

Open access
van Zonneveld, Maarten, Rakha, Mohamed, Tan, Shin yee, Chou, Yu-Yu, Chang, Ching-Huan, Yen, Jo-Yi, Schafleitner, Roland, Nair, Ramakrishnan +2 more·2020·Scientific Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

This study provides insights in patterns of distribution of abiotic and biotic stress resilience across Vigna gene pools to enhance the use and conservation of these genetic resources for legume breeding. Vigna is a pantropical genus with more than 88 taxa including important crops such as V. radiata (mung bean) and V. unguiculata (cowpea). Our results show that sources of pest and disease resistance occur in at least 75 percent of the Vigna taxa, which were part of screening assessments, while sources of abiotic stress resilience occur in less than 30 percent of screened taxa. This difference in levels of resilience suggests that Vigna taxa co-evolve with pests and diseases while taxa are more conservative to adapt to climatic changes and salinization. Twenty-two Vigna taxa are poorly conserved in genebanks or not at all. This germplasm is not available for legume breeding and requires urgent germplasm collecting before these taxa extirpate on farm and in the wild. Vigna taxa, which tolerate heat and drought stress are rare compared with taxa, which escape these stresses because of short growing seasons or with taxa, which tolerate salinity. We recommend prioritizing these rare Vigna taxa for conservation and screening for combined abiotic and biotic stress resilience resulting from stacked or multifunctional traits. The high presence of salinity tolerance compared with drought stress tolerance, suggests that Vigna taxa are good at developing salt-tolerant traits. Vigna taxa are therefore of high value for legume production in areas that will suffer from salinization under global climate change.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-020-58646-8

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One primary challenge in stacking traits is the potential for negative interactions between different genetic modifications.

    “One primary challenge in stacking traits is the potential for negative interactions between different genetic modifications (Zonneveld et al., 2020).”

    From Emerging applications of gene editing technologies for the development of climate-resilient crops (2025) · cites this paper as Zonneveld et al., 2020

    The Introduction discusses linkage drag and crossing barriers in breeding, while the Discussion’s “Identification of multifunctional traits” section suggests that Vigna taxa may have accumulated traits that address multiple stresses. Neither passage addresses negative interactions between different genetic modifications when stacking traits; searches for that interaction and for antagonistic trait effects found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [38]Tomooka, N., Kaga, A., Isemura, T. & Vaughan, D. Vigna. in Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources: Legume Crops and Forages 291–311 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011).
  2. [39]Garba, M. & Pasquet, R. S. The Vigna vexillata (L.) A. Rich. gene pool. in Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Tuberous Legumes (eds. Soerensen M., Estrella, E., Hamann, O. & Rios, R.) 61–71 (Copenhague MacKensie, 1998).
  3. [54]Dalin, P., Ågren, J., Björkman, C., Huttunen, P., & Kärkkäinen, K. Leaf trichome formation and plant resistance to herbivory. Induced plant resistance to herbivory (Springer Netherlands, 2008).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Zonneveld, M., Rakha, M., Tan, S. Y., Chou, Y.-Y., Chang, C.-H., Yen, J.-Y., Schafleitner, R., Nair, R., Naito, K., & Solberg, S. Ø.
Affiliations
  • World Vegetable Center (TW)
  • Genetic Resources Center (JP)
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2020-02-07
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
2111-2111
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3005469507
Cited by
65
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 2
FWCI
5.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • United States Agency for International Development
  • Government of the United Kingdom
  • Bundesministerium für Wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung
  • Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agricultural pest management studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
Keywords
Vigna, wild legume, biotic stress resistance, germplasm conservation, legume breeding, salt tolerance, drought tolerance, heat tolerance, pest and disease resistance, mungbean, cowpea, stacked traits, climate change adaptation
MeSH terms
Plant Breeding, Vigna, Conservation of Natural Resources, Gene Pool, Stress, Physiological, Phylogeography, Disease Resistance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review