Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 35Fungal Biology and ApplicationsMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsFungal and yeast genetics research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optimization of cultivation techniques improves the agronomic behavior of Agaricus subrufescens

Open access
Pardo-Giménez, Arturo, Pardo, José Emilio, Dias, Eustáquio Souza, Rinker, Danny Lee, Caitano, Cinthia Elen Cardoso, Zied, Diego Cunha·2020·Scientific Reports
DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-65081-2PMC PMC7235075
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

New species of medicinal mushrooms have emerged over the past several decades, such as the Sun mushroom, Agaricus subrufescens. Horticultural improvements are required to shift its cultivation from small-scale local production to large-scale international production. The research reported here evaluated the agronomic behavior and the chemical characteristics of the Sun mushroom as a function of i) nutritional supplementation ii) ruffling of the casing layer and iii) the temperature management on the primordia induction and reduction of the crop cycle. Supplementation was beneficial for yield, unit mushroom weigh and decrease in time to first harvest. Supplementation improved biological efficiency with Champfood providing a yield increase of 15% over the non-supplemented compost. Among the supplements only Promycel increased the individual mushroom weight. Ruffling overall improved the yield in the 2 nd and 4 th flush. Already biological efficiency was greater by 21%. The highest yield harvested in any single day in the crop occurred in 3 rd flush with the amount of 2.484 kg of mushrooms per m 2 for the rapid induction method. Still the biological efficiency was not significantly affected by the mushroom induction temperature method. Only the fat content of the mushrooms was positively affected by the rapid induction of primordia. Champfood supplement promotes a reduction in the value of earliness and an increase of 1 st flush yield. The ruffling technique provided an increase in biological efficiency due to the great number of mushrooms harvested. Rapid primordia induction allowed the crop cycle to end 3 days earlier than the slow primordia induction, providing a higher production rate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-020-65081-2

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 (A) Temperature management used for slow and rapid primordia induction; (B) Yield obtained by flushes with slow and rapid induction of primordia (Factor 3). The picture demonstrates differences in pileus color (HEX value represents an international color code obtained by the measure of L *, a * and b *, https://www.nixsensor.com/free-color-converter/). Value of slow induction (L* 56.43, a* 8.55 and b* 19.74) and rapid induction (L* 59.56, a* 8.05 and b* 19.92). Production rate of slow induction was 0.67 kg dt−1 d−1 and rapid induction was 0.73 kg dt−1 d−1.
Figure 1 (A) Temperature management used for slow and rapid primordia induction; (B) Yield obtained by flushes with slow and rapid induction of primordia (Factor 3). The picture demonstrates differences in pileus color (HEX value represents an international color code obtained by the measure of L *, a * and b *, https://www.nixsensor.com/free-color-converter/). Value of slow induction (L* 56.43, a* 8.55 and b* 19.74) and rapid induction (L* 59.56, a* 8.05 and b* 19.92). Production rate of slow induction was 0.67 kg dt−1 d−1 and rapid induction was 0.73 kg dt−1 d−1.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Yield obtained by flushes with non-supplemented and supplemented compost (Factor 1). For each flush, values followed by a different letter are significantly different at 5% level according to Tukey’s HSD test.
Figure 2 Yield obtained by flushes with non-supplemented and supplemented compost (Factor 1). For each flush, values followed by a different letter are significantly different at 5% level according to Tukey’s HSD test.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Correlations between biological efficiency and the contents of fat.
Figure 3 Correlations between biological efficiency and the contents of fat.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Yield obtained by flushes with non-ruffled and ruffled casing layer (Factor 2). For each flush, values followed by a different letter are significantly different at 5% level according to Tukey’s HSD test.
Figure 4 Yield obtained by flushes with non-ruffled and ruffled casing layer (Factor 2). For each flush, values followed by a different letter are significantly different at 5% level according to Tukey’s HSD test.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Sánchez, E. J., Zied, D. C. & Alberto, E. Edible mushroom production in the Americas, in 9th International Conference on Mushroom Biology and Mushroom Products. WSMBMP, Shanghai, China, pp. 2–11, (2018).
  2. Fritsche, G. & Sonnenberg, A. S. M. Mushroom strains. In The Cultivation of Mushrooms, ed. by van Griensven, L. J. L. D., Interlingua, Sussex, England, pp. 101–123 (1988).
  3. Couvy, J. Les facteurs de la fructification de l’Agaricus bisporus (champignon de couche). Bull FNSACC 14, 585–604 (1972).
  4. Kopytowski Filho, J. & Minhoni, M. T. A. Produtividade e eficiência biológica da linhagem ABL 99/30 de Agaricus blazei em três tipos de compostos e em dois ambientes de cultivo. Energia na Agricultura 22, 65–78 (2007).
  5. Lau, O. Methods of chemical analysis of mushrooms. In Tropical Mushrooms. Biological Nature and Cultivation Methods, ed. by Chang, S. T. & Quimio, T. H. The Chinese University Press, Hong Kong, China, pp. 87–116 (1982).
  6. Randle, P. E. & Smith, J. F. Economic aspects of compost supplementation. Mushroom Journal 165, 297–305 (1986).
  7. Van Gils, J. J. Cultivation. In The Cultivation of Mushrooms, ed. by van Griensven, L. J. L. D., Interlingua, Sussex, England, pp. 263-308, (1988).
  8. Vedder, P. J. C. Practical experience with the cac’ing technique. Mushroom Science 12, 381–385 (1989).
  9. Eira, A. F., Nascimento, J. S., Colauto, N. B. & Celso, P. G. Tecnologia de cultivo do cogumelo medicinal Agaricus blazei (Agaricus brasiliensis). Agropecuária Catarinense 18, 45–49 (2005).

Cited by

See all 35

Related

Metadata

Authors
Pardo-Giménez, A., Pardo, J. E., Dias, E. S., Rinker, D. L., Caitano, C. E. C., & Zied, D. C.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Lavras (BR)
  • University of Guelph (CA)
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
Corresponding author
Zied, Diego Cunha
ORCID
Venue
Scientific Reports
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-05-18
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
8154-8154
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1038/s41598-020-65081-2
PMC
PMC7235075
OpenAlex
W3025511850
Cited by
35
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Universidade Estadual Paulista (FAPESP 2018/21492-2)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Fungal Biology and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
Agaricus subrufescens, medicinal mushroom cultivation, dietary supplementation, temperature control, biological efficiency, mushroom yield, crop duration
MeSH terms
Agaricus, Agriculture, Culture Media, Soil, Temperature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.