Cited by 12Dengue and Mosquito Control ResearchMosquito-borne diseases and controlInsect Pest Control Strategies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Knowledge on exotic mosquitoes in Germany, and public acceptance and effectiveness of Bti and two self-prepared insecticides against Aedes japonicus japonicus

Open access

Abstract

Abstract Mosquito-borne diseases are a continuous challenge to public health. To prevent transmission, Integrated Vector Management (IVM) applies preventive, control, and communicational strategies that should be feasible, environmentally benign, and sustainable. IVM shows higher efficiency when being supported by local communities. Accordingly, we applied a social-ecological approach to identify the public acceptance of control measures and effectiveness of Eurocent coins containing copper, clove essential oil (EO) and Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis (Bti). We performed field and laboratory experiments to demonstrate the toxicity of alternative substances against Aedes japonicus japonicus. In expert interviews, we asked for (1) knowledge on exotic mosquitoes in Germany, (2) potential chances of alternative substances in future mosquito control, and (3) their needs for further clarification before application. We assessed potential users’ (4) awareness of exotic mosquitoes and (5) willingness to apply the substances. Self-prepared copper coins and EO were clearly preferred by potential users over Bti. However, 100% mortality of the sensitive first stage could not be reached with the number of ten 5-Eurocent coins showing limited toxicity. Clove EO was shown to work as oviposition deterrent and larvicide with a LC 50 of 17 mg l −1 (95% CI: 15–19 mg l −1 ). This study shows the importance of potential users’ perspectives in IVM and the need for authorised insecticides.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-020-75780-5

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 69 references

1 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Takken, W. & van den Berg, H. Manual on Prevention of Establishment and Control of Mosquitoes of Public Health Importance in the WHO European Region (with Special Reference to Invasive Mosquitoes) (World Health Organization, Geneva, 2018).
  2. World Health Organisation (WHO). Global Strategic Framework for Integrated Vector Management (WHO, Geneva, 2004).
  3. Becker, N. The use of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis (Bti) against mosquitoes, with special emphasis on the ecological impact. Isr. J. Entomol. 32, 63–69 (1998).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 12

Metadata

Authors
Reuss, F., Kreß, A., Braun, M., Magdeburg, A., Pfenninger, M., Müller, R., & Mehring, M.
Affiliations
  • Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (DE)
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Corresponding author
Reuss, Friederike
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2020-11-03
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
18901-18901
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3094715528
Cited by
12
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Centre on Climate Change and Adaptation of the Hessian Agency for Nature Conservation, Environment and Geology
  • Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany (AECO (number 01Kl1717))
  • Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
  • Projekt DEAL
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Dengue and Mosquito Control Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
Keywords
Aedes japonicus japonicus, exotic mosquitoes, Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis, clove oil, copper coins, mosquito control, integrated vector management, public acceptance, oviposition deterrent, larvicidal toxicity, socio-ecological approach, mosquito-borne diseases
MeSH terms
Aedes, Animals, Bacillus thuringiensis, Consumer Behavior, Copper, Germany, Insect Control, Insecticides, Numismatics, Oils, Volatile, Pest Control, Biological, Plant Oils, Syzygium

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review