Cited by 32Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesAngiogenesis and VEGF in CancerMRI in cancer diagnosis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Baseline microvessel density predicts response to neoadjuvant bevacizumab treatment of locally advanced breast cancer

Open access

Abstract

A subset of breast cancer patients benefits from preoperative bevacizumab and chemotherapy, but validated predictive biomarkers are lacking. Here, we aimed to evaluate tissue-based angiogenesis markers for potential predictive value regarding response to neoadjuvant bevacizumab treatment in breast cancer. In this randomized 1:1 phase II clinical trial, 132 patients with large or locally advanced HER2-negative tumors received chemotherapy ± bevacizumab. Dual Factor VIII/Ki-67 immunohistochemical staining was performed on core needle biopsies at baseline and week 12. Microvessel density (MVD), proliferative microvessel density (pMVD; Factor VIII/Ki-67 co-expression), glomeruloid microvascular proliferation (GMP), and a gene expression angiogenesis signature score, were studied in relation to pathologic complete response (pCR), clinico-pathologic features and intrinsic molecular subtype. We found that high baseline MVD (by median) significantly predicted pCR in the bevacizumab-arm (odds ratio 4.9, P = 0.012). High pMVD, presence of GMP, and the angiogenesis signature score did not predict pCR, but were associated with basal-like (P ≤ 0.009) and triple negative phenotypes (P ≤ 0.041). pMVD and GMP did also associate with high-grade tumors (P ≤ 0.048). To conclude, high baseline MVD significantly predicted response to bevacizumab treatment. In contrast, pMVD, GMP, and the angiogenesis signature score, did not predict response, but associated with aggressive tumor features, including basal-like and triple-negative phenotypes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-021-81914-0

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The results on the histological class pairs associated with pCR and RD are in line with previously published studies.

    “These results are in line with previously published studies [58–66].”

    From Digital image analysis and machine learning-assisted prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in triple-negative breast cancer (2024) · cites this paper as [64]

    The Results section reports that high baseline microvessel density was associated with pCR in the bevacizumab arm, but does not connect histological class pairs to pCR or residual disease. Searches for histological type, grade, and residual disease found no passage establishing the comparison attributed to this paper. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.71)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Krüger, K., Silwal-Pandit, L., Wik, E., Straume, O., Stefansson, I. M., Borgen, E., Garred, Ø., Naume, B., Engebraaten, O., & Akslen, L. A.
Affiliations
  • Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
Corresponding author
Akslen, Lars A.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2021-02-09
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
3388-3388
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3128705022
Cited by
32
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Sanofi
  • Kreftforeningen (11003001)
  • Helse Vest (223250)
  • Universitetet i Bergen (223250)
  • Norges Forskningsråd (223250, 191436/V50)
  • Helse Sør-Øst RHF
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › MRI in cancer diagnosis
Keywords
microvessel density, bevacizumab, neoadjuvant therapy, locally advanced breast cancer, HER2-negative breast cancer, predictive biomarkers, angiogenesis, pathological complete response, triple-negative breast cancer, basal-like breast cancer, tumor grade
MeSH terms
Bevacizumab, Microvascular Density, Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neovascularization, Pathologic, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Biopsy, Large-Core Needle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review