Cited by 39Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHuman Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Machine learning detects altered spatial navigation features in outdoor behaviour of Alzheimer’s disease patients

Open access
Ghosh, Abhirup, Puthusseryppady, Vaisakh, Chan, Dennis, Mascolo, Cecilia, Hornberger, Michael·2022·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Impairment of navigation is one of the earliest symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but to date studies have involved proxy tests of navigation rather than studies of real life behaviour. Here we use GPS tracking to measure ecological outdoor behaviour in AD. The aim was to use data-driven machine learning approaches to explore spatial metrics within real life navigational traces that discriminate AD patients from controls. 15 AD patients and 18 controls underwent tracking of their outdoor navigation over two weeks. Three kinds of spatiotemporal features of segments were extracted, characterising the mobility domain (entropy, segment similarity, distance from home), spatial shape (total turning angle, segment complexity), and temporal characteristics (stop duration). Patients significantly differed from controls on entropy (p-value 0.008), segment similarity (p-value $${10}^{-7}$$ 10 - 7 ), and distance from home (p-value $${10}^{-14}$$ 10 - 14 ). Graph-based analyses yielded preliminary data indicating that topological features assessing the connectivity of visited locations may also differentiate patients from controls. In conclusion, our results show that specific outdoor navigation features discriminate AD patients from controls, which has significant implication for future AD diagnostics, outcome measures and interventions. Furthermore, this work illustrates how wearables-based sensing of everyday behaviour may be used to deliver ecologically-valid digital biomarkers of AD pathophysiology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-022-06899-w

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [24]Gray, R. M. Entropy and Information Theory. (Springer, 2013).
  2. [38]Jiang H Location privacy-preserving mechanisms in location-based services: A comprehensive survey ACM Comput. Surv. 2021 54 1 36
  3. [40]Li T Sahu AK Talwalkar A Smith V Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2020 37 50 60

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghosh, A., Puthusseryppady, V., Chan, D., Mascolo, C., & Hornberger, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Hornberger, Michael
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2022-02-24
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
3160-3160
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4213459059
Cited by
39
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6
FWCI
5.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (213939)
  • the Earle & Stuart Charitable Trust and the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia (R205319)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, spatial navigation, GPS tracking, ecological validity, digital biomarkers, movement patterns, spatio-temporal features, graph analysis, wearable devices, early diagnosis, stop duration
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Spatial Behavior, Spatio-Temporal Analysis, Spatial Navigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review