The post‑conflict expansion of coca farming and illicit cattle ranching in Colombia
Open accessAbstract
Illicit cattle ranching and coca farming have serious negative consequences on the Colombian Amazon’s land systems. The underlying causes of these land activities include historical processes of colonization, armed conflict, and narco-trafficking. We aim to examine how illicit cattle ranching and coca farming are driving forest cover change over the last 34 years (1985–2019). To achieve this aim, we combine two pixel-based approaches to differentiate between coca farming and cattle ranching using hypothetical observed patterns of illicit activities and a deep learning algorithm. We found evidence that cattle ranching, not coca, is the main driver of forest loss outside the legal agricultural frontier. There is evidence of a recent, explosive conversion of forests to cattle ranching outside the agricultural frontier and within protected areas since the negotiation phase of the peace agreement. In contrast, coca is remarkably persistent, suggesting that crop substitution programs have been ineffective at stopping the expansion of coca farming deeper into protected areas. Countering common narratives, we found very little evidence that coca farming precedes cattle ranching. The spatiotemporal dynamics of the expansion of illicit land uses reflect the cumulative outcome of agrarian policies, Colombia’s War on Drugs, and the 2016 peace accord. Our study enables the differentiation of illicit land activities, which can be transferred to other regions where these activities have been documented but poorly distinguished spatiotemporally. We provide an applied framework that could be used elsewhere to disentangle other illicit land uses, track their causes, and develop management options for forested land systems and people who depend on them.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the post-peace era since 2016, these dynamics have increasingly converged on cattle ranching as a 'narco-cattle' conduit for money laundering, land speculation and frontier expansion, similar to the case in Guatemala.
“Now, in the post-peace era since 2016, these dynamics have increasingly converged on cattle ranching as a”
From Beyond the “supply chain” framing: Cattle ranching as a vanishing mediator of deforestation and dispossession in the Brazilian and Colombian Amazon (2026) · cites this paper as Murillo-Sandoval et al., 2023a
The Introduction and Discussion link cattle expansion after the 2016 peace accord to speculative land claims, drug-profit laundering, and frontier expansion. The Discussion also calls narco-cattle ranching a strategy for money laundering. But its Guatemala example concerns forest concessions and conservation, not a comparable narco-cattle conduit. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe literature notes that cattle ranching functions as a vehicle for legitimising illicit land claims-by converting forest to pasture, actors can formalise ownership and launder cocaine profits-while armed groups provide the coercive security needed to protect these new ranches.
“The literature also notes that cattle ranching functions as a vehicle for legitimising illicit land claims-by converting forest to pasture, actors can formalise ownership and launder cocaine profits-while armed groups provide the coercive security needed to protect these new ranches (Murillo-Sandoval et al., 2023a).”
From Beyond the “supply chain” framing: Cattle ranching as a vanishing mediator of deforestation and dispossession in the Brazilian and Colombian Amazon (2026) · cites this paper as Murillo-Sandoval et al., 2023a
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the post-peace era since 2016, these dynamics have increasingly converged on cattle ranching as a 'narco-cattle' conduit for money laundering, land speculation and frontier expansion, similar to the case in Guatemala.
“Now, in the post-peace era since 2016, these dynamics have increasingly converged on cattle ranching as a”
From Beyond the “supply chain” framing: Cattle ranching as a vanishing mediator of deforestation and dispossession in the Brazilian and Colombian Amazon (2026) · cites this paper as Murillo-Sandoval et al., 2023b
The Introduction and Discussion link Colombia’s post-2016 cattle expansion to speculative land claims, frontier clearing, territorial control, and laundering drug profits. But the Discussion mentions Guatemala as an example of forest concessions and conservation, not as a comparable case of narco-cattle ranching. That comparison is not supported by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredStudies show that ranching expands unimpeded even into protected areas, not unlike in Brazil.
“Studies show that ranching expands unimpeded even into protected areas (López et al., 2024;Murillo-Sandoval et al., 2023b), not unlike in Brazil.”
From Beyond the “supply chain” framing: Cattle ranching as a vanishing mediator of deforestation and dispossession in the Brazilian and Colombian Amazon (2026) · cites this paper as Murillo-Sandoval et al., 2023b
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Howard, A., Sandler, M., Chen, B., Wang, W., Chen, L.-C., Tan, M., Chu, G., Vasudevan, V., Zhu, Y., Pang, R., et al. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00140 · Cited by 9,708 · see citing works
Deep learning in remote sensing applications: A meta-analysis and review
Ma, L., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Ye, Y., Yin, G., & Johnson, B. A. (2019) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.04.015 · Cited by 2,456 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- [2]Geist H Land-Use and Cover Change Local Processes and lobal Impacts 2006 Springer
- [3]Meyfroidt P Rudel TK Lambin EF Forest transitions, trade, and the global displacement of land use Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010 107 20917 20922 21078977 PMC3000287
- [6]Macedo MN Decoupling of deforestation and soy production in the southern Amazon during the late 2000s Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012 109 1341 1346 22232692 PMC3268292
- [7]Azevedo AA Limits of Brazil’s Forest Code as a means to end illegal deforestation Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017 114 7653 7658 28674015 PMC5530639
- [12]Tellman B Magliocca NR Ii BLT Verburg PH Understanding the role of illicit transactions in land-change dynamics Nat. Sustain. 2020 10.1038/s41893-019-0457-1 · DOI
- [14]Hansen MC High-resolution global maps of forest cover change Science (80-) 2013 342 850 853 24233722
- [15]Curtis PG Slay CM Harris NL Tyukavina A Hansen MC Classifying drivers of global forest loss Science (80-) 2018 361 1108 1111 30213911
- [16]Rindfuss RR Walsh SJ Turner BL Fox J Mishra V Developing a science of land change: Challenges and methodological issues Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004 101 13976 13981 15383671 PMC521107
- [25]Gootenberg P Davalos LM The Origins of Cocaine 2018 Routledge Taylor Francis Group
- [37]Geoghegan, J. et al. “Socializing the pixel” and “pixelizing the social". In Land-Use and Land-Cover Change. People and Pixels: Linking Remote Sensing and Social Science 51–69. 10.17226/5963 (National Academy Press, 1998). · DOI
- [50]Salgar, A. M. H. & Cárdenas, L. M. M. Colombia: Bridging the gaps between what is needed and what actually exists regarding the protection of its Amazon. In The 21st Century Fight for the Amazon 115–130 (2017). 10.1007/978-3-319-56552-1_6. · DOI
- [57]Saleska SR Didan K Huete AR da Rocha HR Amazon forests green-up during 2005 drought Science. 2007 318 612 LP 17885095
- [58]Clerici N Deforestation in Colombian protected areas increased during post-conflict periods Sci. Rep. 2020 10 1 10 32188909 PMC7080754
- [69]McSweeney K Richani N Pearson Z Devine J Wrathall DJ Why do narcos invest in rural land? J. Lat. Am. Geogr. 2017 16 3 29
- [72]Magliocca NR Modeling cocaine traffickers and counterdrug interdiction forces as a complex adaptive system Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2019 116 7784 7792 30936311 PMC6475386
- [75]Lyons K Chemical warfare in Colombia, evidentiary ecologies and senti-actuando practices of justice Soc. Stud. Sci. 2018 48 414 437 29570040
- [77]Murillo-Sandoval, P. J. Disentangling the landscape during armed conflicts and post-peace agreements: Clues from Colombia’s Andes-Amazon region. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag.n/a, 1–5. https://setac.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ieam.4689 (2022). 36168787 · DOI
- [79]Van Den Hoek, J. et al. Refugee camps as climate traps: Measuring the enviro-climatic marginality of 922 global refugee camps with satellite time series data. In AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts vol. 2018 IN44A-04 (2018).
- [86]Ronneberger O Fischer P Brox T Navab N Hornegger J Wells WM Frangi AF U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2015 2015 Springer 234 241
- [87]Vincent, P., Larochelle, H., Bengio, Y. & Manzagol, P.-A. Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning 1096–1103 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2008). 10.1145/1390156.1390294. · DOI · Paper page
- [90]Kingma, D. & Ba, J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. International Conference on Learning Representations (2014).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bastos Lima, M. G., & López, J. (2026) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2026.107532
- Authors
- Murillo-Sandoval, P. J., Kilbride, J., Tellman, E., Wrathall, D., Van Den Hoek, J., & Kennedy, R. E.
- Affiliations
- Oregon State University (US)
- University of Arizona (US)
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2023-02-03
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1965-1965
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9898308
- OpenAlex
- W4319081320
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 8
- FWCI
- 7.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Oregon State University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Conflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Keywords
- forest cover change, Colombian Amazon, protected areas, 2016 peace agreement, war on drugs, forest conversion, armed conflict, drug trafficking, agricultural policy, driving forces of land use change
- MeSH terms
- Farms, Agriculture, Animals, Cattle, Coca, Cocaine, Colombia, Conservation of Natural Resources
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review