Cited by 6Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsGenomics and Rare DiseasesGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Machine learning-based somatic variant calling in cell-free DNA of metastatic breast cancer patients using large NGS panels

Open access
Jongbloed, Elisabeth M., Jansen, Maurice P. H. M., de Weerd, Vanja, Helmijr, Jean A., Beaufort, Corine M., Reinders, Marcel J. T., van Marion, Ronald, van IJcken, Wilfred F. J. +6 more·2023·Scientific Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Next generation sequencing of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a promising method for treatment monitoring and therapy selection in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, distinguishing tumor-specific variants from sequencing artefacts and germline variation with low false discovery rate is challenging when using large targeted sequencing panels covering many tumor suppressor genes. To address this, we built a machine learning model to remove false positive variant calls and augmented it with additional filters to ensure selection of tumor-derived variants. We used cfDNA of 70 MBC patients profiled with both the small targeted Oncomine breast panel (Thermofisher) and the much larger Qiaseq Human Breast Cancer Panel (Qiagen). The model was trained on the panels' common regions using Oncomine hotspot mutations as ground truth. Applied to Qiaseq data, it achieved 35% sensitivity and 36% precision, outperforming basic filtering. For 20 patients we used germline DNA to filter for somatic variants and obtained 245 variants in total, while our model found seven variants, of which six were also detected using the germline strategy. In ten tumor-free individuals, our method detected in total one (potentially germline) variant, in contrast to 521 variants detected without our model. These results indicate that our model largely detects somatic variants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-023-37409-1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI is used in nearly every step of next-generation sequencing processing and interpretation, including mutation identification, artifact filtering, and driver gene identification.

    “This includes the use of AI in nearly every step of next-generation sequencing (NGS) processing and interpretation, including mutation identification (122, 123), artifact filtering (124), and driver gene identification (125).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 6

Authors
Jongbloed, E. M., Jansen, M. P. H. M., de Weerd, V., Helmijr, J. A., Beaufort, C. M., Reinders, M. J. T., van Marion, R., van IJcken, W. F. J., Sonke, G. S., Konings, I. R., Jager, A., Martens, J. W. M., Wilting, S. M., & Makrodimitris, S.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Makrodimitris, Stavros
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2023-06-27
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
10424-10424
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4382196084
Cited by
6
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Dutch CAA Foundation
  • Breast Cancer Now’s Catalyst Programme (2018NovPCC100)
  • Convergence Health and Technology program of Erasmus University Medical Center and Delft University of Technology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
somatic variant calling, cell-free DNA, metastatic breast cancer, liquid biopsy, machine learning, gene panel, tumor suppressor, germline variant filtering, treatment monitoring
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Cell-Free Nucleic Acids, Breast, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Mutation, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review