Machine learning-based somatic variant calling in cell-free DNA of metastatic breast cancer patients using large NGS panels
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Next generation sequencing of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a promising method for treatment monitoring and therapy selection in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, distinguishing tumor-specific variants from sequencing artefacts and germline variation with low false discovery rate is challenging when using large targeted sequencing panels covering many tumor suppressor genes. To address this, we built a machine learning model to remove false positive variant calls and augmented it with additional filters to ensure selection of tumor-derived variants. We used cfDNA of 70 MBC patients profiled with both the small targeted Oncomine breast panel (Thermofisher) and the much larger Qiaseq Human Breast Cancer Panel (Qiagen). The model was trained on the panels' common regions using Oncomine hotspot mutations as ground truth. Applied to Qiaseq data, it achieved 35% sensitivity and 36% precision, outperforming basic filtering. For 20 patients we used germline DNA to filter for somatic variants and obtained 245 variants in total, while our model found seven variants, of which six were also detected using the germline strategy. In ten tumor-free individuals, our method detected in total one (potentially germline) variant, in contrast to 521 variants detected without our model. These results indicate that our model largely detects somatic variants.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI is used in nearly every step of next-generation sequencing processing and interpretation, including mutation identification, artifact filtering, and driver gene identification.
“This includes the use of AI in nearly every step of next-generation sequencing (NGS) processing and interpretation, including mutation identification (122, 123), artifact filtering (124), and driver gene identification (125).”
From Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions (2024) · cites this paper as [124]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 6
- Authors
- Jongbloed, E. M., Jansen, M. P. H. M., de Weerd, V., Helmijr, J. A., Beaufort, C. M., Reinders, M. J. T., van Marion, R., van IJcken, W. F. J., Sonke, G. S., Konings, I. R., Jager, A., Martens, J. W. M., Wilting, S. M., & Makrodimitris, S.
- Affiliations
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- Delft University of Technology (NL)
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Makrodimitris, Stavros
- ORCID
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2023-06-27
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10424-10424
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10300101
- OpenAlex
- W4382196084
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Dutch CAA Foundation
- Breast Cancer Now’s Catalyst Programme (2018NovPCC100)
- Convergence Health and Technology program of Erasmus University Medical Center and Delft University of Technology
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- somatic variant calling, cell-free DNA, metastatic breast cancer, liquid biopsy, machine learning, gene panel, tumor suppressor, germline variant filtering, treatment monitoring
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Cell-Free Nucleic Acids, Breast, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Mutation, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review