Hybrid convolution neural network with channel attention mechanism for sensor-based human activity recognition
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
In the field of machine intelligence and ubiquitous computing, there has been a growing interest in human activity recognition using wearable sensors. Over the past few decades, researchers have extensively explored learning-based methods to develop effective models for identifying human behaviors. Deep learning algorithms, known for their powerful feature extraction capabilities, have played a prominent role in this area. These algorithms can conveniently extract features that enable excellent recognition performance. However, many successful deep learning approaches have been built upon complex models with multiple hyperparameters. This paper examines the current research on human activity recognition using deep learning techniques and discusses appropriate recognition strategies. Initially, we employed multiple convolutional neural networks to determine an effective architecture for human activity recognition. Subsequently, we developed a hybrid convolutional neural network that incorporates a channel attention mechanism. This mechanism enables the network to capture deep spatio-temporal characteristics in a hierarchical manner and distinguish between different human movements in everyday life. Our investigations, using the UCI-HAR, WISDM, and IM-WSHA datasets, demonstrated that our proposed model, which includes cross-channel multi-size convolution transformations, outperformed previous deep learning architectures with accuracy rates of 98.92%, 98.80%, and 98.45% respectively. These results indicate that the suggested model surpasses state-of-the-art approaches in terms of overall accuracy, as supported by the research findings.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
Activity recognition using cell phone accelerometers
Kwapisz, J. R., Weiss, G. M., & Moore, S. A. (2011) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1964897.1964918 · Cited by 2,912 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The WISDM dataset 36 serves as a fundamental HAR dataset derived from the Wireless Sensor Data Mining Laboratory.”
MethodDeep Convolutional and LSTM Recurrent Neural Networks for Multimodal Wearable Activity Recognition
Ordóñez, F., & Roggen, D. (2016) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s16010115 · Cited by 2,761 · see citing works
Deep learning for sensor-based activity recognition: A survey
Wang, J., Chen, Y., Hao, S., Peng, X., & Hu, L. (2019) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2018.02.010 · Cited by 2,014 · see citing works
LSTM-CNN Architecture for Human Activity Recognition
Xia, K., Huang, J., & Wang, H. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2982225 · Cited by 851 · see citing works
The Opportunity challenge: A benchmark database for on-body sensor-based activity recognition
Chavarriaga, R., Sagha, H., Calatroni, A., Digumarti, S. T., Tröster, G., Millán, J. D. R., & Roggen, D. (2013) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2012.12.014 · Cited by 742 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Additionally, they compared three benchmark datasets for HAR: the Opportunity dataset 25 , the Skoda dataset 26 , and the UCI-HAR dataset 27 (collected using smartphones with multiple inertial measurement units).”
BackgroundComplex Human Activity Recognition Using Smartphone and Wrist-Worn Motion Sensors
Shoaib, M., Bosch, S., Incel, O., Scholten, H., & Havinga, P. (2016) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s16040426 · Cited by 423 · see citing works
Human Activity Recognition Based on Motion Sensor Using U-Net
Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhang, Y., Bao, J., Zhang, Y., & Deng, H. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2920969 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Human activity recognition using temporal convolutional neural network architecture
Andrade-Ambriz, Y. A., Ledesma, S., Ibarra-Manzano, M.-A., Oros-Flores, M. I., & Almanza-Ojeda, D.-L. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116287 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
IDMatchHAR: Semi-Supervised Learning for Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition Using Pretraining
Takenaka, K., Sakai, S., & Hasegawa, T. (2025) · IEEE Sensors Letters · doi:10.1109/lsens.2025.3546985 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mekruksavanich, S., & Jitpattanakul, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Phayao (TH)
- King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok (TH)
- Corresponding author
- Jitpattanakul, Anuchit
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2023-07-26
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 12067-12067
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10371984
- OpenAlex
- W4385277267
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 12
- FWCI
- 6.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Greater South Information System
- Funders
- Thailand Science Research and Innovation Fund
- University of Phayao (FF66-UoE001)
- King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok (KMUTNB-66-KNOW-05)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
- Keywords
- human activity recognition, wearable sensors, channel attention, hybrid convolutional neural network, spatiotemporal feature extraction, UCI-HAR, WISDM
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Humans, Human Activities, Movement, Neural Networks, Computer, Recognition, Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review