Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 11Cardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and TrainingRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 47 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Similar effects on exercise performance following different respiratory muscle training programs in healthy young men

Open access

Abstract

Both respiratory muscle endurance training (RMET) and inspiratory resistive training (IMT) seem to increase whole-body exercise performance, but direct comparisons between the two are scarce. We hypothesized that the similarity of RMET to exercise-induced ventilation would induce larger improvements compared to IMT. Twenty-six moderately-trained men performed either 4 weeks of RMET, IMT or SHAM training. Before and after the interventions, respiratory muscle endurance, 3-km running time-trial performance and leg muscle fatigue after intense constant-load cycling (assessed with femoral nerve magnetic stimulation) were measured. Both RMET (+ 59%) and IMT (+ 38%) increased respiratory muscle endurance (both p < 0.01 vs. SHAM) but only IMT increased inspiratory strength (+ 32%, p < 0.001 vs. SHAM). 3-km time improved showing a main effect of training (p = 0.026), however with no differences between groups. Leg fatigue after cycling was not attenuated with training (p = 0.088 for group-training interaction). All groups showed a significant (~ 0.3 l) increase in average tidal volume during cycling exercise combined with a concomitant reduction in respiratory exertion. While RMET and IMT improved specific aspects of respiratory muscles performance, no benefits beyond SHAM were seen during whole-body exercise. Changes in respiratory sensations might be a result of altered breathing pattern.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

In 26 moderately trained men, 4 weeks of RMET or IMT improved respiratory muscle endurance—and IMT also improved inspiratory strength—but neither improved whole-body running or cycling performance beyond SHAM. Quadriceps fatigue after high-intensity cycling was not attenuated, questioning ergogenic effects of respiratory muscle training in this population.

Key findings

  • Respiratory muscle endurance increased after RMET (+59%) and IMT (+38%) versus SHAM (both p < 0.01), but only IMT increased maximal inspiratory pressure (+32%, p < 0.001 vs. SHAM).
  • 3-km running time improved across all groups (main effect of training p = 0.026; RMET −1.9 ± 2.4%, IMT −1.3 ± 2.7%, SHAM −1.4 ± 4.4%), with no differences between groups.
  • Cycling endurance duration did not change with training (group-training interaction p = 0.645), and leg fatigue after equal cycling was not attenuated (group-training interaction p = 0.088 for Qtw after first exhaustion/isotime; no within-group changes).
  • All groups showed an ~0.3 L increase in average tidal volume during cycling and a reduction in respiratory exertion (main effect of training p = 0.010), but these did not translate into benefits beyond SHAM.

Methods

  • Single-blinded randomized study in 26 active, non-smoking men with normal lung function assigned to RMET (n = 9), IMT (n = 9), or SHAM (n = 8) for 4 weeks.
  • Pre/post assessments included lung function, incremental cycling, constant-load cycling to exhaustion at 85% Wmax with coached ventilation and femoral nerve magnetic stimulation for quadriceps twitch force (Qtw), a 3-km running time-trial, and a respiratory muscle endurance test.
  • Main analysis used 2-way ANOVA (group and training) with Tukey post hoc when required; Qtw was expressed as a percentage of baseline values; p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Limitations

  • Stated: during post-training cycling tests, coached V̇E was slightly lower than before training; the authors note this magnitude is unimportant for fatigue but could have amplified any ergogenic effect if anything.
  • Stated: only men were studied; the authors call for more trials on potential sex differences given women’s smaller lungs for body size and higher O2 cost of ventilation.
  • Stated/evident: possible lack of familiarity with the performance tests, though similar pacing and Qtw results support robustness; evident from the text: small per-group samples (n = 8–9) and the SHAM group performed slow deep inspirations plus MVV15 tracking, which may have induced breathing-pattern changes rather than being inert.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-023-41580-w

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Figure 1 Maximal workload (A), peak oxygen uptake (B) and peak pulmonary ventilation (C) during an incremental cycling test performed before (Pre) and after (Post) respiratory muscle endurance training (RMET), inspiratory muscle resistive training (IMT) and SHAM training, given for individual participants (open circles) and as a group mean (closed circles).
Figure 1 Maximal workload (A), peak oxygen uptake (B) and peak pulmonary ventilation (C) during an incremental cycling test performed before (Pre) and after (Post) respiratory muscle endurance training (RMET), inspiratory muscle resistive training (IMT) and SHAM training, given for individual participants (open circles) and as a group mean (closed circles).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Mean ± SD for quadriceps twitch force (Qtw) reduction at isotime and at the end of the cycling endurance test before (open symbols, Pre) and after (closed symbols, Post) respiratory muscle endurance training (RMET, top), inspiratory muscle resistive training (IMT, middle), or SHAM training (bottom).
Figure 2 Mean ± SD for quadriceps twitch force (Qtw) reduction at isotime and at the end of the cycling endurance test before (open symbols, Pre) and after (closed symbols, Post) respiratory muscle endurance training (RMET, top), inspiratory muscle resistive training (IMT, middle), or SHAM training (bottom).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Individual values for quadriceps twitches (Qtw, as percentage of baseline values) measured after an equal workload of cycling before (Pre) and after (Post) a 4-week period of either respiratory muscle endurance training (RMET), inspiratory muscle training (IMT) or SHAM training.
Figure 3 Individual values for quadriceps twitches (Qtw, as percentage of baseline values) measured after an equal workload of cycling before (Pre) and after (Post) a 4-week period of either respiratory muscle endurance training (RMET), inspiratory muscle training (IMT) or SHAM training.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 3-km running duration (A), blood lactate concentration at the end of the test ([La], B) and average heart rate (HR, C) before (Pre) and after (Post) respiratory muscle endurance training (RMET), inspiratory muscle resistive training (IMT) or SHAM training, given for individual participants (open circles) and as a group mean (closed circles). *main effect of training (pre vs. post) at p = 0.026.
Figure 4 3-km running duration (A), blood lactate concentration at the end of the test ([La], B) and average heart rate (HR, C) before (Pre) and after (Post) respiratory muscle endurance training (RMET), inspiratory muscle resistive training (IMT) or SHAM training, given for individual participants (open circles) and as a group mean (closed circles). *main effect of training (pre vs. post) at p = 0.026.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Lap-by-lap performance during the 3-km time-trial performed before (open symbols) and after (closed symbols) (A) respiratory muscle endurance training (RMET); (B) inspiratory muscle resistive training (IMT); or (C) SHAM training. Data are mean ± SD. There was a main effect of training (p = 0.026 indicating superior performance after the training period when all three groups were pooled.
Figure 5 Lap-by-lap performance during the 3-km time-trial performed before (open symbols) and after (closed symbols) (A) respiratory muscle endurance training (RMET); (B) inspiratory muscle resistive training (IMT); or (C) SHAM training. Data are mean ± SD. There was a main effect of training (p = 0.026 indicating superior performance after the training period when all three groups were pooled.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 0 Not valid · 26 Not checked · 65 Own results and interpretations

39 more claims

Create a free account to see all 91 claims and to verify the 47 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 36
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 17

Create a free account to see these claims.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Tong, T. K., Wu, S., Nie, J., Baker, J. S. & Lin, H. The occurrence of core muscle fatigue during high-intensity running. J. Sport. Sci. Med. 13, 244–251 (2014).

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Notter, D. A., Verges, S., Renggli, A. S., Beltrami, F. G., & Spengler, C. M.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Spengler, Christina M.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2023-09-26
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
16135-16135
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387043375
Cited by
11
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Funders
Scientific Council of AGIRàdom
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
respiratory muscle training, respiratory muscle endurance training, exercise performance, leg muscle fatigue, respiratory muscle endurance, tidal volume, breathing pattern, sham training, young men
MeSH terms
Breathing Exercises, Humans, Lung, Male, Respiration, Respiratory Muscles, Exercise, Muscle Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-13, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-13 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.