Cited by 10Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

A probabilistic view of protein stability, conformational specificity, and design

Open access
Stern, Jacob A., Free, Tyler J., Stern, Kimberlee L., Gardiner, Spencer, Dalley, Nicholas A., Bundy, Bradley C., Price, Joshua L., Wingate, David +1 more·2023·Scientific Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Various approaches have used neural networks as probabilistic models for the design of protein sequences. These "inverse folding" models employ different objective functions, which come with trade-offs that have not been assessed in detail before. This study introduces probabilistic definitions of protein stability and conformational specificity and demonstrates the relationship between these chemical properties and the $$p(\text {structure}|\text {seq})$$ p ( structure | seq ) Boltzmann probability objective. This links the Boltzmann probability objective function to experimentally verifiable outcomes. We propose a novel sequence decoding algorithm, referred to as “BayesDesign”, that leverages Bayes’ Rule to maximize the $$p(\text {structure}|\text {seq})$$ p ( structure | seq ) objective instead of the $$p(\text {seq}|\text {structure})$$ p ( seq | structure ) objective common in inverse folding models. The efficacy of BayesDesign is evaluated in the context of two protein model systems, the NanoLuc enzyme and the WW structural motif. Both BayesDesign and the baseline ProteinMPNN algorithm increase the thermostability of NanoLuc and increase the conformational specificity of WW. The possible sources of error in the model are analyzed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-023-42032-1

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Stern, J. A., Free, T. J., Stern, K. L., Gardiner, S., Dalley, N. A., Bundy, B. C., Price, J. L., Wingate, D., & Della Corte, D.
Affiliations
Brigham Young University (US)
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2023-09-19
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
15493-15493
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386846484
Cited by
10
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
protein design, inverse folding, protein stability, conformational specificity, sequence decoding, thermal stability, ProteinMPNN, probabilistic models
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Amino Acid Sequence, Bayes Theorem, Likelihood Functions, Protein Stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review