Cited by 6COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchTraditional Chinese Medicine Clinical Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Safety and efficacy of oral administrated cepharanthine in non-hospitalized, asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 patients: a Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial: Author detials

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Cepharanthine (CEP) is a natural remedy that potently inhibits SARS-CoV-2 activity both in vitro and in vivo. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of CEP compared with placebo in adults with asymptomatic or mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), we conducted a proof-of-concept, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were randomized to receive 120 mg/day of CEP, 60 mg/day CEP or placebo for 5 days. Main outcome was the time from randomization to negative nasopharyngeal swab and safety. Among 262 randomized participants, 188 completed the trial among group of 120 mg/day CEP ( n = 65), 60 mg/day CEP ( n = 68) and placebo ( n = 55). Neither 120 mg/day or 60 mg/day CEP shortened the time to negative significantly compared with placebo. However, 60 mg/day CEP showed a slight trend (difference=-0.77 days, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.40, 95% CI 0.97–2.01, p = 0.072). In analysis of participants with good medication compliance, 60 mg/day CEP significantly shortened the time to negative (difference=-0.87 days, HR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.03–2.37, p = 0.035). Adverse events were not different among the three groups, and no serious adverse events occurred. In conclusion, treatment of asymptomatic or mild Covid-19 with 120 mg/day or 60 mg/day did not shorten the time to negative significantly. However, 60 mg/day CEP showed a slight trend which needs future confirmatory trials to validate. (NCT05398705).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-024-75891-3

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Jacobs, J. L., Haidar, G. & Mellors, J. W. COVID-19: challenges of viral variants. Annu. Rev. Med.74, 31–53 (2023). · DOI
  2. COVID-19 Cumulative Infection Collaborators. Estimating global, regional, and national daily and cumulative infections with SARS-CoV-2 through Nov 14, 2021: a statistical analysis. Lancet. 399 (10344), 2351–2380 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Rogosnitzky, M., Okediji, P. & Koman, I. Cepharanthine: a review of the antiviral potential of a japanese-approved alopecia drug in COVID-19. Pharmacol. Rep.72 (6), 1509–1516 (2020). · DOI
  4. Bailly, C. & Cepharanthine An update of its mode of action, pharmacological properties and medical applications. Phytomedicine. 62, 152956 (2019). · DOI
  5. Riva, L. et al. Discovery of SARS-CoV-2 antiviral drugs through large-scale compound repurposing. Nature. 586 (7827), 113–119 (2020). · DOI
  6. Ayele, A. G., Enyew, E. F. & Kifle, Z. D. Roles of existing drug and drug targets for COVID-19 management. Metabol Open.11, 100103 (2021). · DOI
  7. Sixto-López, Y. et al. Structural insights into SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and its natural mutants found in Mexican population. Sci. Rep.11 (1), 4659 (2021). · DOI
  8. Ohashi, H. et al. Potential anti-COVID-19 agents, cepharanthine and nelfinavir, and their usage for combination treatment. iScience. 24 (4), 102367 (2021). · DOI
  9. Lan, J. et al. Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound to the ACE2 receptor. Nature. 581 (7807), 215–220 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  10. White, M. A., Lin, W. & Cheng, X. Discovery of COVID-19 inhibitors targeting the SARS-CoV-2 Nsp13 helicase. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.11 (21), 9144–9151 (2020). · DOI
  11. Hossain, R. et al. In Silico Screening of Natural products as potential inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 using Molecular Docking Simulation. Chin. J. Integr. Med.28 (3), 249–256 (2022). · DOI
  12. Fan, H. H. et al. Repurposing of clinically approved drugs for treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 in a 2019-novel coronavirus-related coronavirus model. Chin. Med. J. (Engl). 133 (9), 1051–1056 (2020). · DOI
  13. Zhang, S. et al. Comparison of viral RNA-host protein interactomes across pathogenic RNA viruses informs rapid antiviral drug discovery for SARS-CoV-2. Cell. Res.32 (1), 9–23 (2022). · DOI
  14. Rogosnitzky, M. & Danks, R. Therapeutic potential of the biscoclaurine alkaloid, cepharanthine, for a range of clinical conditions. Pharmacol. Rep.63 (2), 337–347 (2011). · DOI
  15. Berlin, D. A., Gulick, R. M. & Martinez, F. J. Severe Covid-19. N Engl. J. Med.383 (25), 2451–2460 (2020). · DOI
  16. Gandhi, R. T., Lynch, J. B. & Del Rio, C. Mild or moderate Covid-19. N Engl. J. Med.383 (18), 1757–1766 (2020). · DOI
  17. Docherty, A. B. et al. Features of 20 133 UK patients in hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ. 369, m1985 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Zhou, F. et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 395 (10229), 1054–1062 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  19. Chen, T. et al. Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019: retrospective study. BMJ. 368, m1091 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  20. Samra, Y. A. et al. Cepharanthine and Piperine ameliorate diabetic nephropathy in rats: role of NF-κB and NLRP3 inflammasome. Life Sci.157, 187–199 (2016). · DOI
  21. Murakami, K., Okajima, K. & Uchiba, M. The prevention of lipopolysaccharide-induced pulmonary vascular injury by pretreatment with cepharanthine in rats. Am. J. Respir Crit. Care Med.161 (1), 57–63 (2000). · DOI
  22. Uto, T., Nishi, Y., Toyama, M., Yoshinaga, K. & Baba, M. Inhibitory effect of cepharanthine on dendritic cell activation and function. Int. Immunopharmacol.11 (11), 1932–1938 (2011). · DOI
  23. Xu, W. et al. Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications of tetrandrine and cepharanthine in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and autoimmune diseases. Pharmacol. Ther.217, 107659 (2021). · DOI
  24. Fan, Y. et al. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant: recent progress and future perspectives. Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther.7 (1), 141 (2022). · DOI
  25. Lu Li, J. T. et al. Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant-infected individuals with intermittently positive retest viral RNA after discharge. Natl. Sci. Rev.9 (10), nwac141 (2022). · DOI
  26. Xu, Y. et al. Characteristics of pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infection and potential evidence for persistent fecal viral shedding. Nat. Med.26 (4), 502–505 (2020). · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Wei, J., Liu, S., Bian, Y., Li, L., Qian, B., Shen, Z., Zhang, Y., Abuduaini, A., Dong, F., Zhang, X., Li, J., Yu, Y., Zhang, W., Wang, J., Zhai, W., Song, Q., Zheng, Y., Pan, W., Yu, L., Zhan, Q., Zhang, N., Zheng, J., Pan, S., Yao, C., & Li, H.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • Peking University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Pan, Shuming
  • Yao, Chen
  • Li, Hai
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-01-31
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
3875-3875
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407005494
Cited by
6
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3
FWCI
3.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Shanghai Municipal Education Commission-Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant Support (20152213)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Clinical Research
Keywords
cepharanthine, COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, asymptomatic infection, mild COVID-19, oral antiviral therapy, nasopharyngeal swab, adverse events, medication adherence, natural remedies
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Drug Treatment, Administration, Oral, Adult, Aged, Antiviral Agents, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Benzylisoquinolines, Benzodioxoles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review