Cited by 1,415COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

Characteristics of pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infection and potential evidence for persistent fecal viral shedding

Open access
Xu, Yi, Li, Xufang, Zhu, Bing, Liang, Huiying, Fang, Chunxiao, Gong, Yu, Guo, Qiaozhi, Sun, Xin +8 more·2020·Nature Medicine

Abstract

We report epidemiological and clinical investigations on ten pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infection cases confirmed by real-time reverse transcription PCR assay of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Symptoms in these cases were nonspecific and no children required respiratory support or intensive care. Chest X-rays lacked definite signs of pneumonia, a defining feature of the infection in adult cases. Notably, eight children persistently tested positive on rectal swabs even after nasopharyngeal testing was negative, raising the possibility of fecal-oral transmission.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41591-020-0817-4

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a study by Xu et al., rectal swabs were positive in 8 of 10 pediatric patients, even after the nasopharyngeal swabs became negative.

    “In a study by Xu et al., rectal swabs were positive in 8 of 10 pediatric patients, even after the nasopharyngeal swabs became negative [14].”

    From Acute mesenteric ischemia in COVID-19 patients (2021) · cites this paper as [14]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, Y., Li, X., Zhu, B., Liang, H., Fang, C., Gong, Y., Guo, Q., Sun, X., Zhao, D., Shen, J., Zhang, H., Liu, H., Xia, H., Tang, J., Zhang, K., & Gong, S.
Affiliations
  • Guangzhou Women and Children Medical Center (CN)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • Macau University of Science and Technology (MO)
Corresponding author
  • Xia, Huimin
  • Zhang, Kang
  • Gong, Sitang
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2020-03-13
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
502-505
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W3012415734
Cited by
1,415
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 107 · 2022: 189 · 2021: 388 · 2020: 643
FWCI
43.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, pediatric COVID-19, fecal viral shedding, fecal-oral transmission, rectal swabs, nasopharyngeal swab, mild symptoms
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Testing, Child, Child, Preschool, Feces, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Nasopharynx, Pneumonia, Viral, Rectum, Radiography, Thoracic, Virus Shedding, Coronavirus Infections, Clinical Laboratory Techniques, Pandemics, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review