CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12Innovations in Medical EducationProblem and Project Based LearningInnovative Teaching Methods

Research on the application of CBL combined with BOPPPS teaching mode in oral and maxillofacial surgery teaching: a randomized controlled study

Open access
Gao, Ning, Fu, Kun, Li, Na, He, Wei·2024·Scientific Reports
DOI 10.1038/s41598-024-77432-4PMC PMC11532410
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

To discuss the application value of Case-based Learning (CBL) combined with Bridge-In, Objective, Pre-assessment, Participatory Learning, Post-assessment, and Summary (BOPPPS) model into master students' program of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 38 master's students in oral and maxillofacial surgery at Y2 and Y3 from January 2022 to December 2022 are selected as the research objects. They are randomly assigned into two learning groups, namely the traditional LBL (Learn-based Learning) (19 participants) and CBL combined with BOPPPS mode (19 participants). Their theoretical knowledge was assessed after training and the modified Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) scale was used to score their clinical thinking. At the same time, the Personal Teaching Efficiency and the Teachers' Sense of Teaching Efficiency (TSTE) were evaluated, and students' satisfaction with teaching outcomes was investigated. The basic theoretical knowledge, clinical case analysis and total scores of the experimental group were better than those of the control group, with statistically significant difference (P <0.05). Based on the evaluation of clinical speculative thinking by the modified Mini-CEX, it is found that except for the medical history writing level without statistically significant difference (P >0.05), the other four items and total scores in the experimental group were better than those in the control group, with statistically significant difference (P <0.05).The Personal Teaching Efficiency, TSTE and total scores were higher than those before adopting CBL combined with BOPPPS teaching mode, with statistically significant difference (P <0.05).The sampled master's students in experimental group believed that the new teaching method could improve students' ability to clinical speculative thinking, with statistically significant difference in all aspects (P <0.05).More participants in the experimental group suggested that the new teaching mode has increased learning pressure, but without statistically significant difference (P >0.05). CBL combined with BOPPPS teaching method can improve students' clinical critical thinking ability and help them adapt to the clinical rhythm. It is an effective measure to ensure teaching quality and is worthy of promotion. It is worthwhile to promote the application of CBL combined with BOPPPS mode into master's course of oral and maxillofacial surgery, which not only improve the basic theoretical knowledge and speculative thinking ability of master's students, but also improve the teaching efficiency.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-024-77432-4

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. [1]Ma, X. et al. Effect of blended learning with BOPPPS model on Chinese student outcomes and perceptions in an introduction course of health services management. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 45, 409–417. 10.1152/advan.00180.2020 (2021). 34018832 · DOI
  2. [2]Yang, Y., You, J., Wu, J., Hu, C. & Shao, L. The effect of microteaching combined with the BOPPPS model on dental materials education for predoctoral dental students. J. Dent. Educ. 83, 567–574. 10.21815/JDE.019.068 (2019). 30858273 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Yang, F., Lin, W. & Wang, Y. Flipped classroom combined with case-based learning is aneffective teaching modality in nephrology clerkship. BMC Med. Educ. 21, 276. 10.1186/s12909-021-02723-7 (2021). 33990199 PMC8122572 · DOI
  4. [4]Cai, L., Li, Y. L., Hu, X. Y. & Li, R. Implementation of flipped classroom combined with case-based learning: a promising and effective teaching modality in undergraduate pathology education. Med. (Baltim). 101, e28782. 10.1097/MD.0000000000028782 (2022). PMC8812661 35119043 · DOI
  5. [5]Yang, N. Research on the application of BOPPPS teaching mode in theinteractive integration of online and offline teaching in colleges and universitiesduring post epidemic period. Adv. Soc. Sci. Educ. Hum. Res. 490, 265–268. 10.2991/assehr.k.201127.052 (2020). · DOI
  6. [7]Fuentes-Cimma, J. et al. Evaluación para el aprendizaje: diseño e implementación de un mini-CEX en el internado profesional de la carrera de kinesiología. ARS MEDICA Revista de Ciencias Médicas. 45, 22–28. 10.11565/arsmed.v45i3.1683 (2020). · DOI
  7. [8]Wang, H., Sun, W., Zhou, Y., Li, T. & Zhou, P. Teachers’ assessment literacy improves teaching efficacy: a view from conservation of resources theory. Front. Psychol. 13, 1007830. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1007830 (2022). 36389569 PMC9649984 · DOI
  8. [9]Kumar, T., Sakshi, P. & Kumar, C. Comparative study between case-based learning and flipped classroom for teaching clinical and applied aspects of physiology in competency-based UG curriculum. J. Family Med. Prim. Care. 11, 6334–6338. 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_172_22 (2022). 36618252 PMC9810855 · DOI
  9. [10]Kolahdouzan, M. et al. The effect of case-based teaching and flipped classroom methods in comparison with lecture method on learning and satisfaction of internship students in surgery. J. Educ. Health Promot. 9, 256. 10.4103/jehp.jehp_237_19 (2020). 33225000 PMC7657411 · DOI
  10. [11]Zijun, L. & Sen, Q. The construction. of BOPPPS teaching model in the course ofinorganic chemistry course. In: Proceedings of the 2018 3rd International Conferenceon Society Science and Economics Development (ICSSED 2018). 157–9 (DEStechPublications Inc., 2018).
  11. [12]Hu, K., Ma, R. J., Ma, C., Zheng, Q. K. & Sun, Z. G. Comparison of the BOPPPS model and traditional instructional approaches in thoracic surgery education. BMC Med. Educ.22 (447). 10.1186/s12909-022-03526-0 (2022). PMC9185859 35681190 · DOI
  12. [15]Li, Y. et al. Application of flipped classroom combined with case-based learning in introduction to Environmental Health Science. Front. Public. Health. 11, 1264843. 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1264843 (2023). 37790715 PMC10542574 · DOI
  13. [16]Ma, X., Zeng, D., Wang, J., Xu, K. & Li, L. Effectiveness of bridge-in, objective, pre-assessment, participatory learning, post-assessment, and summary teaching strategy in Chinese medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Med. 9, 975229. 10.3389/fmed.2022.975229 (2022). PMC9521335 36186766 · DOI
  14. [17]Fuentes-Cimma, J. et al. Utility analysis of an adapted Mini-CEX WebApp for clinical practice assessment in physiotherapy undergraduate students. Front. Educ. 8, 943709. 10.3389/feduc.2023.943709 (2023). · DOI
  15. [18]Al Ansari, A., Ali, S. K. & Donnon, T. The construct and criterion validity of the mini-CEX: a meta-analysis of the published research. Acad. Med. 88, 413–420. 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318280a953 (2013). 23348084 · DOI
  16. [19]Berendonk, C., Rogausch, A., Gemperli, A. & Himmel, W. Variability and dimensionality of students’ and supervisors’ mini-CEX scores in undergraduate medical clerkships - a multilevel factor analysis. BMC Med. Educ. 18, 1–18. 10.1186/s12909-018-1207-1 (2018). 29739387 PMC5941409 · DOI
  17. [20]De Lima, L. A. A. et al. Validity, reliability, feasibility and satisfaction of the mini-clinical evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) for cardiology residency. Training. 29, 785–790. 10.1080/01421590701352261 (2007). 17917984 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gao, N., Fu, K., Li, N., & He, W.
Affiliations
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (CN)
Corresponding author
He, Wei
ORCID
Venue
Scientific Reports
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2024-11-03
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
26510-26510
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1038/s41598-024-77432-4
PMC
PMC11532410
OpenAlex
W4404010284
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Zhengzhou University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
Keywords
case-based learning, BOPPPS model, oral and maxillofacial surgery training, master's students, clinical reasoning, teaching efficiency, student satisfaction, Mini-CEX
MeSH terms
Adult, Educational Measurement, Female, Humans, Male, Surgery, Oral, Teaching, Problem-Based Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review