Cited by 3Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningArtificial Intelligence in EducationReinforcement Learning in Robotics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The necessity of multimodal feedback for learning effective pedagogical policies with reinforcement learning

Open access
Che, Lingxuan, Guo, Pu, Isleem, Haytham F., Wang, Zeyu·2025·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Traditional teaching evaluation methods are often retrospective and coarse-grained, lacking the continuous, moment-to-moment feedback required for real-time pedagogical adaptation in language training. Existing intelligent tutoring systems frequently fail to address this, underutilizing multimodal behavioral signals and leaving a critical gap in understanding whether such signals are essential for learning effective policies. This paper introduces a Reinforcement Learning (RL) framework to solve this problem. We propose a hybrid cognitive-linguistic model using a Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) actor-critic agent, which operates on a novel 516-dimensional state vector that fuses a 512-dimensional semantic embedding from a pre-trained T5 model with a 4-dimensional vector of simulated cognitive-behavioral signals (correctness, response time, attention, hint request). Tested in a simulated learner environment built on the Tatoeba corpus, our agent autonomously discovers a highly effective policy, achieving a mean episodic reward of 6.563, on par with the optimal heuristic baseline. The identified policy, albeit optimal in the simulation, embodies a counterintuitive method that significantly prioritized task repetition by the learner. Our hypothesis is confirmed by a critical ablation experiment: an agent that is deprived of the cognitive-behavioral signals does not learn, and they are as good as a random baseline (mean reward 5.213). The present work gives conclusive evidence that multimodal cognitive-behavioral cues are not only supplementary but are an inevitable part of learning by adaptive pedagogical agents. We mainly provide validation of a hybrid state representation that allows an RL agent to learn effective teaching strategies, making way for more useful and customized educational technologies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-025-29892-5

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 The seven-step development process for the adaptive language training agent.
Fig. 1 The seven-step development process for the adaptive language training agent.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Statistical distributions of the four key cognitive-behavioral signals within the simulated learner dataset.
Fig. 2 Statistical distributions of the four key cognitive-behavioral signals within the simulated learner dataset.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Training and validation loss curves for the supervised pre-training phase.
Fig. 3 Training and validation loss curves for the supervised pre-training phase.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 Diagram of the Actor-Critic agent architecture.
Fig. 4 Diagram of the Actor-Critic agent architecture.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 5 Progression of the agent’s average reward during reinforcement learning training.
Fig. 5 Progression of the agent’s average reward during reinforcement learning training.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 6 Actor and Critic loss curves over the course of training.
Fig. 6 Actor and Critic loss curves over the course of training.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 7 Evolution of the agent’s action selection policy over 2000 training episodes.
Fig. 7 Evolution of the agent’s action selection policy over 2000 training episodes.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 8 Boxplot comparison of the reward distribution per episode for the PPO agent and baseline models.
Fig. 8 Boxplot comparison of the reward distribution per episode for the PPO agent and baseline models.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 9 Agent reward distributions conditioned on the initial correctness of the learner’s response.
Fig. 9 Agent reward distributions conditioned on the initial correctness of the learner’s response.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 10 Violin plot of the aggregated reward distribution from all training episodes.
Fig. 10 Violin plot of the aggregated reward distribution from all training episodes.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 11 Pie charts showing the distribution of actions selected by each agent type.
Fig. 11 Pie charts showing the distribution of actions selected by each agent type.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 12 A t-SNE visualization of the agent’s learned state representations, colored by the chosen action.
Fig. 12 A t-SNE visualization of the agent’s learned state representations, colored by the chosen action.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 13 Correlation matrix heatmap for the cognitive-behavioral signals and the total episodic reward.
Fig. 13 Correlation matrix heatmap for the cognitive-behavioral signals and the total episodic reward.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 14 Ablation study results showing the impact of cognitive-behavioral signals.
Fig. 14 Ablation study results showing the impact of cognitive-behavioral signals.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Harrison, R. et al. Evaluating and enhancing quality in higher education teaching practice: A meta-review. Stud. High. Educ. 47(1), 80–96 (2022). · DOI
  2. Jafari, N. et al. Design strategies to foster improved experiences for patients in rehabilitation. HERD Health Environ. Res. Des. J. 18, 111–124 (2025).
  3. Flake, S. M. & Gabriel, K. F. Teaching Unprepared Students: Strategies for Promoting Success and Retention in Higher Education (Routledge, 2023).
  4. Shahrokhi Kahnooj, H., Dadgar, H. & Saberi, H. Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the WH-Question comprehension test in children with autism. Appl. Neuropsychol. Child 13(2), 146–151 (2024). · DOI
  5. Hilliger, I., Celis, S. & Perez-Sanagustin, M. Engaged versus disengaged teaching staff: A case study of continuous curriculum improvement in higher education. High Educ. Pol. 35(1), 81–101 (2022). · DOI
  6. Martin, F., Chen, Y., Moore, R. L. & Westine, C. D. Systematic review of adaptive learning research designs, context, strategies, and technologies from 2009 to 2018. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 68(4), 1903–1929 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Koujel, N. K. & Major, J. C. An exploration of the intersectional distribution of physical, social, and emotional resources in engineering. In 2024 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–9 (IEEE, 2024). · DOI
  8. Koujel, N. K. & Major, J. C. An examination of the gender gap among Middle Eastern students in Engineering: A systematized review. In 2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD) (2025).
  9. Tisza, G., Sharma, K., Papavlasopoulou, S., Markopoulos, P. & Giannakos, M. Understanding fun in learning to code: A multi-modal data approach. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference, 274–287 (2022). · DOI
  10. Sibley, L. et al. Adaptive teaching with technology enhances lasting learning. Learn. Instr. 99, 1 (2025). · DOI
  11. Al-Zahrani, A. M. & Alasmari, T. Learning analytics for data-driven decision making: Enhancing instructional personalization and student engagement in online higher education. Int. J. Online Pedagogy Course Des. (IJOPCD) 13(1), 1–18 (2023). · DOI
  12. Liang, J. et al. Student modeling and analysis in adaptive instructional systems. IEEE Access 10, 59359–59372 (2022). · DOI
  13. Deldadehasl, M., Karahroodi, H. H. & Haddadian Nekah, P. Customer clustering and marketing optimization in hospitality: A hybrid data mining and decision-making approach from an emerging economy. Tour. Hosp. 6(2), 80 (2025).
  14. Khadem-Reza, Z. K., Lashaki, R. A., Shahram, M. A. & Zare, H. Automatic diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders in children through resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging with machine vision. Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 15(6), 4935 (2025). · DOI
  15. Jeong, J., Lee, J. H., Karahroodi, H. H. & Jeong, I. Uncivil customers and work-family spillover: examining the buffering role of ethical leadership. BMC Psychol. 13(1), 723 (2025). · DOI
  16. Sun, D. et al. A university student performance prediction model and experiment based on multi-feature fusion and attention mechanism. IEEE Access 11, 112307–112319 (2023). · DOI
  17. Sedghi, M., Zolfaghari, M., Mohseni, A. & Nosratian-Ahour, J. Real-time transient stability estimation of power system considering nonlinear limiters of excitation system using deep machine learning: An actual case study in Iran. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 127, 107254 (2024). · DOI
  18. Mohseni, A., Doroudi, A. & Karrari, M. Data mining based excitation system parameters estimation considering DCS and PMU measurements using cubature Kalman filter. Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst. 30(11), e12619 (2020). · DOI
  19. Wang, X., Yu, X., Guo, L., Liu, F. & Xu, L. Student performance prediction with short-term sequential campus behaviors. Information 11(4), 201 (2020). · DOI
  20. Luo, Z. et al. A method for prediction and analysis of student performance that combines multi-dimensional features of time and space. Mathematics 12(22), 3597 (2024). · DOI
  21. Daneshfar, F., Dolati, M. & Sulaimany, S. Graph clustering techniques for community detection in social networks, 81–100 (2025). · DOI
  22. Daneshfar, F., Dolati, M. & Sulaimany, S. Semi-supervised and deep learning approaches to social network community analysis, 101–120 (2025). · DOI
  23. Riedmann, A., Schaper, P. & Lugrin, B. Reinforcement learning in education: A systematic literature review. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-025-00494-6 (2025). · DOI
  24. Mohseni, A., Doroudi, A. & Karrari, M. Robust Kalman filter-based method for excitation system parameters identification using real measured data. J. Energy Manag. Technol. 4(2), 39–48 (2020).
  25. Mohseni, A., Doroudi, A. & Karrari, M. Excitation system parameters Estimation by different input signals and various Kalman filters. Electromech. Energy Convers. Syst. 2(2), 40–51 (2022).
  26. Bassen, J. et al. Reinforcement learning for the adaptive scheduling of educational activities. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–12 (2020). · DOI
  27. Nikzat, P. & Hosseinzade, S. A practical model to measure E-service quality and E-customer satisfaction of crypto wallets. Open J. Bus. Manag. 13(3), 1634–1660 (2025). · DOI
  28. Raeisi, Z. et al. Enhanced classification of tinnitus patients using EEG microstates and deep learning techniques. Sci. Rep. 15(1), 15959 (2025). · DOI
  29. Forney, A. & Mueller, S. Causal inference in AI education: A primer. J. Causal Inference 10(1), 141–173 (2022). · DOI
  30. Ghasemi, M. A., Mohseni, A. & Parniani, M. Enhanced scheme for allocation of primary frequency control reserve based on grid characteristics. Tabriz J. Electr. Eng. 51(2), 221–231 (2021).
  31. Mohseni, A., Sedghi, M., Ravanji, M. H. & Lesani, H. Multiobjective retuning the power system stabilizer (PSS) of a real power plant in Iran grid (2020). · DOI
  32. Wen, J. et al. Federated offline reinforcement learning with multimodal data. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 70(1), 4266–4276 (2023). · DOI
  33. Raeisi, Z., Mehrnia, M., Ahmadi Lashaki, R. & Abedi Lomer, F. Enhancing schizophrenia diagnosis through deep learning: A resting-state fMRI approach. Neural Comput. Appl. 37, 15277–15309 (2025). · DOI
  34. Zhu, Q., Lee, Y.-C. & Wang, H.-C. ActionaBot: Structuring metacognitive conversations towards in-situ awareness in how-to instruction following. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces, 1–20 (2025). · DOI
  35. Lashaki, R. A. et al. EEG microstate analysis in trigeminal neuralgia: Identifying potential biomarkers for enhanced diagnostic accuracy. Acta Neurologica Belgica 125, 1025–1045 (2025). · DOI
  36. Li, X. & Mahmoud, M. Interpretable concept-based deep learning framework for multimodal human behavior modeling. arXiv preprint http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.10145 (2025). · DOI
  37. Raeisi, Z. et al. EEG microstate biomarkers for schizophrenia: a novel approach using deep neural networks. Cogn. Neurodyn. 19(1), 1–26 (2025). · DOI
  38. Zerkouk, M., Mihoubi, M. & Chikhaoui, B. A comprehensive review of AI-based intelligent tutoring systems: Applications and challenges. arXiv preprint http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.18882 (2025). · arXiv
  39. Tariq, R., Aponte Babines, B. M., Ramirez, J., Alvarez-Icaza, I. & Naseer, F. Computational thinking in STEM education: Current state-of-the-art and future research directions. Front. Comput. Sci. 6, 1480404 (2025). · DOI
  40. Zhu, B., Chau, K. T. & Mokmin, N. A. M. Optimizing cognitive load and learning adaptability with adaptive microlearning for in-service personnel. Sci. Rep. 14(1), 25960. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-77122-1 (2024). · DOI
  41. Tong, C. & Ren, C. Deep knowledge tracing and cognitive load estimation for personalized learning path generation using neural network architecture. Sci. Rep. 15(1), 24925. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-10497-x (2025). · DOI
  42. Naseer, F., Khan, M. N., Addas, A., Awais, Q. & Ayub, N. Game mechanics and artificial intelligence personalization: A framework for adaptive learning systems. Educ. Sci. 15(3), 301 (2025). · DOI
  43. Schmucker, R., Pachapurkar, N., Bala, S., Shah, M. & Mitchell, T. Learning to optimize feedback for one million students: Insights from multi-armed and contextual bandits in large-scale online tutoring. arXiv preprint http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.00270 (2025). · arXiv
  44. Scarlatos, A., Liu, N., Lee, J., Baraniuk, R. & Lan, A. Training LLM-based tutors to improve student learning outcomes in dialogues. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 251–266 (Springer, 2025). · DOI
  45. Sharma, P. & Li, Q. Designing simulated students to emulate learner activity data in an open-ended learning environment. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, 986–989 (2024).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Che, L., Guo, P., Isleem, H. F., & Wang, Z.
Affiliations
  • INTI International University (MY)
  • Philippine Christian University (PH)
  • University of York (GB)
Corresponding author
Guo, Pu
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-02
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
454-454
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4416912685
Cited by
3
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Keywords
multimodal feedback, intelligent tutoring systems, proximal policy optimization, language learning, task repetition
MeSH terms
Feedback, Humans, Learning, Reinforcement, Psychology, Teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review