Cited by 3Microplastics and Plastic PollutionNanoparticles: synthesis and applicationsImmunotoxicology and immune responses

Pulmonary toxicity of polymethyl methacrylate nanoplastics via intratracheal intubation in mice

Open access
Youn, Changsic, Jo, Yu-Jin, Kwon, Jeongwoo, Yoon, Seung-Bin, You, Hyeong-Ju, Kim, Ji-Su·2026·Scientific Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Plastics, ubiquitous in daily life and industry, are released into the environment in substantial quantities. Instead of complete biodegradation, plastic waste fragments into smaller particles, accumulating as nanoplastics (NPs; < 1 μm). Humans are exposed to NPs through inhalation and ingestion of contaminated water and food, which can induce cytotoxicity through physical and chemical pathways. Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), commonly used in implants and artificial bones, has been identified in human lungs and associated with pulmonary embolism. While PMMA NP toxicity has been reported in vitro, their in vivo effects, as well as the underlying mechanism, remain poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the pulmonary effects of inhaled PMMA NPs in mice. Mice received 20 or 100 μg of PMMA NPs (25 nm) via intratracheal intubation for 28 days. PMMA-NP preparation and characterization are described in the Methods section. Exposed mice exhibited body weight loss and pulmonary accumulation of PMMA NPs. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) analysis revealed increased cell count and elevated inflammatory cytokines in serum and BALF. Histopathology (H&E staining) revealed abnormalities in lung tissue and alterations in protein and RNA expression. The findings demonstrate that respiratory exposure to PMMA NPs induces lung inflammation, tissue damage, and molecular dysregulation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-025-31615-9

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Youn, C., Jo, Y.-J., Kwon, J., Yoon, S.-B., You, H.-J., & Kim, J.-S.
Affiliations
Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Ji-Su
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-01-06
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
2027-2027
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7119076048
Cited by
3
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
5.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KGM5162524)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
Keywords
poly(methyl methacrylate), nanoplastics, pulmonary toxicity, endotracheal intubation, inhalation exposure, lung inflammation, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, inflammatory cytokines, lung histopathology, plastic waste
MeSH terms
Microplastics, Animals, Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid, Intubation, Intratracheal, Lung, Male, Cytokines, Polymethyl Methacrylate, Mice, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review