Cited by 10Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

Severe deviation in protein fold prediction by advanced AI: a case study

Open access
López-Sagaseta, Jacinto, Urdiciain, Alejandro·2025·Scientific Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning are making groundbreaking strides in protein structure prediction. AlphaFold is remarkable in this arena for its outstanding accuracy in modelling proteins fold based solely on their amino acid sequences. In spite of these remarkable advances, experimental structure determination remains critical. Here we report severe deviations between the experimental structure of a two-domain protein and its equivalent AI-prediction. These observations are particularly relevant to the relative orientation of the domains within the global protein scaffold. We observe positional divergence in equivalent residues beyond 30 Å, and an overall RMSD of 7.7 Å. Significant deviation between experimental structures and AI-predicted models echoes the presence of unusual conformations, insufficient training data and high complexity in protein folding that can ultimately lead to current limitations in protein structure prediction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-025-89516-w

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
López-Sagaseta, J., & Urdiciain, A.
Affiliations
Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA) (ES)
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-02-08
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
4778-4778
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407274771
Cited by
10
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (RYC‐2017‐21683)
  • Ministerio de Universidades
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein structure prediction, AlphaFold, two-domain protein, limited training data
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Amino Acid Sequence, Artificial Intelligence, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Protein Folding, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review