Cited by 4Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyAcne and Rosacea Treatments and EffectsCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

Genetic analyses reveal association between rosacea and cardiovascular diseases

Open access
Gao, Yafang, Xu, Chengan, Yan, Qiqi·2025·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that patients with rosacea tend to have a higher risk of developing cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). However, the potential causal relationship between genetic susceptibility to rosacea and the risk of CVDs remains unclear. Based on summary statistics from publicly available genome-wide association studies (GWASs), we detected the genetic association between rosacea and CVDs by a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method was used as the primary analysis, while weighted median (WM) and MR-Egger were applied as complementary methods. For sensitivity analyses, we applied Cochran's Q test, the intercept of MR-Egger, MR-Pleiotropy Residual Sum and Outlier (MR-PRESSO), funnel plot, and leave-one-out analysis. The MR analysis revealed that rosacea was associated with an elevated risk of hypertension (HTN) (OR = 1.0032, 95% CI [1.0001-1.0063], P = 0.04). However, no casual relationship was found between rosacea and risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) (OR = 1.0099, 95% CI [0.9823-1.0382], P = 0.49), coronary artery disease (CAD) (OR = 1.0138, 95% CI [0.9824-1.0462], P = 0.39), heart failure (HF) (OR = 0.9965, 95% CI [0.9671-1.0268], P = 0.82), ischemic stroke (IS) (OR = 0.9933, 95% CI [0.9545-1.0337], P = 0.74), or myocardial infarction (MI) (OR = 1.0001, 95% CI [0.9988-1.0013], P = 0.92). In the sensitivity analysis, significant heterogeneity was revealed in the MI subgroup according to the Cochran's Q test. Other sensitivity analyses indicated the stability of our results. Reverse MR analysis showed no significant genetic effect of cardiovascular disease on rosacea risk. We are the first to use MR analysis to explore the casual relationship between rosacea and the risk of various CVDs, revealing an increased risk of HTN in patients with rosacea.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-025-91240-4

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bidirectional 2-sample Mendelian randomization analysis found a potential causal link between rosacea and cardiovascular disease.

    “From genetics data, Gao et al (2025) utilized bidirectional 2-sample Mendelian randomization analysis, finding a potential causal link between rosacea and cardiovascular disease”

    From Artificial intelligence–enabled precision medicine for inflammatory skin diseases (2026) · cites this paper as Gao et al, 2025

    The Methods (Study design; page unavailable) confirm that Gao et al. used bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization. The Conclusion (page unavailable) describes a potential causal relationship specifically between rosacea and increased hypertension risk; the Discussion reports no statistically significant association for the other cardiovascular outcomes studied. The claim is therefore broader than the finding. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gao, Y., Xu, C., & Yan, Q.
Affiliations
Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Yan, Qiqi
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-02-24
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
6657-6657
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407870576
Cited by
4
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
rosacea, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, heart failure, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, genetic susceptibility, bidirectional Mendelian randomization, causal inference, pleiotropy, heterogeneity, reverse causality, cardiovascular risk prediction models, cardiovascular risk stratification
MeSH terms
Atrial Fibrillation, Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Hypertension, Risk Factors, Rosacea, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study, Mendelian Randomization Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review