Cited by 2Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersCellular transport and secretion

Protein trafficking and synaptic demand configure complex and dynamic synaptome architectures of individual neurons

Open access
Sorokina, Oksana, Bulovaite, Edita, Sorokin, Anatoly, Grant, Seth G. N., Armstrong, J. Douglas·2026·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Excitatory synapses are the most abundant synapse type in the brain. Being essential for behaviour and implicated in hundreds of brain disorders, these synapses exhibit striking structural and functional diversity. Synaptome mapping at single-synapse resolution reveals that synaptic protein diversity is spatially organised along the dendritic tree of individual neurons and varies with age and cell type. However, the cell biological mechanisms underlying the generation of these complex spatial synaptic patterns remain poorly understood. Potential mechanisms include somatic and dendritic protein synthesis, protein trafficking, and local regulatory mechanisms such as activity-dependent degradation. Here we developed computational models to test how combinations of these processes account for empirical synaptome data. We found that a combination of molecular transport mechanisms and local synaptic demand for proteins was sufficient to explain very complex profiles of synaptic protein distributions observed in young, mature and old mice and in different cell types. Our findings suggest the highly complex and dynamic synaptome architecture of the brain is an emergent property of a minimal set of cell biological processes. Our model sets the stage for simulations of brain tissue incorporating molecularly diverse neuronal and synaptic types in a synaptome and connectome architecture.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-026-40513-7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lifetimes of brain proteins vary widely.

    “Moreover, the lifetimes of brain proteins vary widely [22][23][24]”

    From A feature and not a bug: Replication failures can lead to new biology (2026) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says that synapse-protein turnover differs between synapses, and the Results section “PSD95 protein half-life varies with age” reports modeled PSD95 half-lives of 1.54 days in juvenile mice versus 4.3 days in mature mice. This supports variation in a brain protein’s lifetime, but the paper’s reported analysis focuses on PSD95 rather than establishing how widely lifetimes vary across brain proteins generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A combination of molecular transport mechanisms and local synaptic demand for proteins was sufficient to account for complex profiles of synaptic protein distributions in different cell types.

    “They argue that a combination of molecular transport mechanisms and local synaptic demand for proteins was sufficient to account for complex profiles of synaptic protein distributions in different cell types.”
  • Simple rules can generate the complexity of biological synaptic organization.

    “They suggest that simple rules can generate the complexity of biological synaptic organization.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. [1]Cajal, D. S. R. Y. Nueva concepta de la histologia de los centros nervosos. Annals of Surgery18 122 (1893).
  2. [2]Bayes, A. et al. Characterization of the proteome, diseases and evolution of the human postsynaptic density. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 19–21. 10.1038/nn.2719 (2011). 21170055 PMC3040565 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Frank, R. A. W. et al. NMDA receptors are selectively partitioned into complexes and supercomplexes during synapse maturation. Nat. Commun. 7, 11264. 10.1038/ncomms11264 (2016). 27117477 PMC5227094 · DOI
  4. [4]Sorokina, O., Dominic, D., Bayés, À., Armstrong, J. D. & Grant, S. G. N. Synaptopathydb: a resource for studying the genetic and synaptic basis of nervous system disorders. bioRxiv 10.1101/2025.06.27.661932 (2025). · DOI
  5. [5]Bayes, A. et al. Characterization of the proteome, diseases and evolution of the human postsynaptic density. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 19–21. 10.1038/nn.2719 (2011). 21170055 PMC3040565 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [6]Zhu, F. et al. Architecture of the mouse brain synaptome. Neuron 99, 781-799.e710. 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.07.007 (2018). 30078578 PMC6117470 · DOI
  7. [7]Cizeron, M. et al. A brainwide atlas of synapses across the mouse life span. Science 369, 270–275. 10.1126/science.aba3163 (2020). 32527927 PMC7115813 · DOI
  8. [8]Distler, U. et al. Proteomic analysis of brain region and sex-specific synaptic protein expression in the adult mouse brain. Cells 10.3390/cells9020313 (2020). 32012899 PMC7072627 · DOI
  9. [9]Bulovaite, E. et al. A brain atlas of synapse protein lifetime across the mouse lifespan. Neuron 110, 4057-4073.e4058. 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.09.009 (2022). 36202095 PMC9789179 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [10]Morris, K. et al. Sequential replacement of PSD95 subunits in postsynaptic supercomplexes is slowest in the cortex. Elife 10.7554/eLife.99303 (2024). 39570289 PMC11581426 · DOI
  11. [11]Wagle, S., Kraynyukova, N., Hafner, A. S. & Tchumatchenko, T. Computational insights into mRNA and protein dynamics underlying synaptic plasticity rules. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 125, 103846. 10.1016/j.mcn.2023.103846 (2023). 36963534 PMC10274545 · DOI
  12. [12]Doyle, M. & Kiebler, M. A. Mechanisms of dendritic mRNA transport and its role in synaptic tagging. EMBO J. 30, 3540–3552. 10.1038/emboj.2011.278 (2011). 21878995 PMC3181491 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [13]Williams, A. H., O’Donnell, C., Sejnowski, T. J. & O’Leary, T. Dendritic trafficking faces physiologically critical speed-precision tradeoffs. Elife 10.7554/eLife.20556 (2016). 28034367 PMC5201421 · DOI
  14. [14]McDougal, R. A., Hines, M. L. & Lytton, W. W. Reaction-diffusion in the NEURON simulator. Front. Neuroinform. 7, 28. 10.3389/fninf.2013.00028 (2013). 24298253 PMC3828620 · DOI
  15. [15]Migliore, M. & Migliore, R. Know your current I(h): Interaction with a shunting current explains the puzzling effects of its pharmacological or pathological modulations. PLoS One 7, e36867. 10.1371/journal.pone.0036867 (2012). 22606301 PMC3350476 · DOI
  16. [17]Revest, J. M. et al. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis is involved in anxiety-related behaviors. Mol. Psychiatr. 14, 959–967. 10.1038/mp.2009.15 (2009). 19255582 · DOI · Paper page
  17. [18]Li, T. P., Song, Y., MacGillavry, H. D., Blanpied, T. A. & Raghavachari, S. Protein crowding within the postsynaptic density can impede the escape of membrane proteins. J. Neurosci. 36, 4276–4295. 10.1523/jneurosci.3154-15.2016 (2016). 27076425 PMC4829651 · DOI
  18. [19]Bressloff, P. C. & Earnshaw, B. A. Diffusion-trapping model of receptor trafficking in dendrites. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 75, 041915. 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.041915 (2007). 17500929 · DOI
  19. [20]Sartori, F. et al. Statistical laws of protein motion in neuronal dendritic trees. Cell Rep. 33, 108391. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108391 (2020). 33207192 PMC7672524 · DOI
  20. [21]Welte, M. A. Bidirectional transport along microtubules. Curr. Biol. 14, R525-537. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.045 (2004). 15242636 · DOI · Paper page
  21. [22]Hirokawa, N. & Takemura, R. Molecular motors and mechanisms of directional transport in neurons. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 201–214. 10.1038/nrn1624 (2005). 15711600 · DOI
  22. [23]Newby, J. M. & Bressloff, P. C. Quasi-steady state reduction of molecular motor-based models of directed intermittent search. Bull. Math. Biol. 72, 1840–1866. 10.1007/s11538-010-9513-8 (2010). 20169417 · DOI
  23. [24]Kiebler, M. A. & Bauer, K. E. RNA granules in flux: dynamics to balance physiology and pathology. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 25, 711–725. 10.1038/s41583-024-00859-1 (2024). 39367081 · DOI
  24. [25]Setou, M., Nakagawa, T., Seog, D. H. & Hirokawa, N. Kinesin superfamily motor protein KIF17 and mLin-10 in NMDA receptor-containing vesicle transport. Science 288, 1796–1802. 10.1126/science.288.5472.1796 (2000). 10846156 · DOI
  25. [26]Yoo, K.-S. et al. Postsynaptic density protein 95 (PSD-95) is transported by KIF5 to dendritic regions. Mol. Brain 12, 97. 10.1186/s13041-019-0520-x (2019). 31753031 PMC6873588 · DOI
  26. [27]Reig-Viader, R. et al. Synaptic proteome diversity is shaped by the levels of glutamate receptors and their regulatory proteins. bioRxiv 10.1101/2024.04.04.588090 (2025). PMC12647736 41290593 · DOI
  27. [28]Liu, X. A., Rizzo, V. & Puthanveettil, S. V. Pathologies of axonal transport in neurodegenerative diseases. Transl. Neurosci. 3, 355–372. 10.2478/s13380-012-0044-7 (2012). 23750323 PMC3674637 · DOI
  28. [29]Louros, S. R. & Osterweil, E. K. Perturbed proteostasis in autism spectrum disorders. J. Neurochem. 139, 1081–1092 (2016). 27365114 PMC5215415 · DOI
  29. [30]Bulovaite, E. et al. A brain atlas of synapse protein lifetime across the mouse lifespan. Neuron 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.09.009 (2022). 36202095 PMC9789179 · DOI · Paper page
  30. [31]Zhu, F. et al. Architecture of the mouse brain synaptome. Neuron 99, 781-799 e710. 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.07.007 (2018). 30078578 PMC6117470 · DOI
  31. [32]Adams, R. et al. SBSI: An extensible distributed software infrastructure for parameter estimation in systems biology. Bioinformatics 29, 664–665. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt023 (2013). 23329415 PMC3582266 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sorokina, O., Bulovaite, E., Sorokin, A., Grant, S. G. N., & Armstrong, J. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (JP)
  • Simons Initiative for the Developing Brain (GB)
  • Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
Corresponding author
Armstrong, J. Douglas
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-03-02
Volume
16
Issue
1
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7133197733
Cited by
2
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
3.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/X009343/1)
  • European Research Council (885069 SYNAPTOME)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
Keywords
excitatory synapses, protein trafficking, dendritic transport, dendritic protein synthesis, computational modelling, dendritic trees, aging, neuronal cell types, connectome
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Computer Simulation, Dendrites, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Synapses, Protein Transport, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review