Cited by 499Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications

Characterization of the proteome, diseases and evolution of the human postsynaptic density

Open access
Bayés, Àlex, van de Lagemaat, Louie N, Collins, Mark O, Croning, Mike D R, Whittle, Ian R, Choudhary, Jyoti S, Grant, Seth G N·2011·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

We isolated the postsynaptic density from human neocortex (hPSD) and identified 1,461 proteins. hPSD mutations cause 133 neurological and psychiatric diseases and were enriched in cognitive, affective and motor phenotypes underpinned by sets of genes. Strong protein sequence conservation in mammalian lineages, particularly in hub proteins, indicates conserved function and organization in primate and rodent models. The hPSD is an important structure for nervous system disease and behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.2719

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bayés, À., van de Lagemaat, L. N., Collins, M. O., Croning, M. D. R., Whittle, I. R., Choudhary, J. S., & Grant, S. G. N.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Grant, Seth G N
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2010-12-19
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
19-21
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W1967232661
Cited by
499
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 39
FWCI
10.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (066717, 89569, 077155)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Keywords
postsynaptic density, human neocortex, proteome, neurological disorders, mental illness, cognitive phenotypes, motor phenotype, protein sequence conservation, hub proteins
MeSH terms
Animals, Central Nervous System Diseases, Pan troglodytes, Humans, Macaca, Mutation, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Species Specificity, Evolution, Molecular, Neocortex, Proteome, Mice, Rats, Post-Synaptic Density

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review