Cited by 392Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataElectronic Health Records Systems

Harnessing the power of synthetic data in healthcare: innovation, application, and privacy

Open access
Giuffrè, Mauro, Shung, Dennis L.·2023·npj Digital Medicine

Abstract

Data-driven decision-making in modern healthcare underpins innovation and predictive analytics in public health and clinical research. Synthetic data has shown promise in finance and economics to improve risk assessment, portfolio optimization, and algorithmic trading. However, higher stakes, potential liabilities, and healthcare practitioner distrust make clinical use of synthetic data difficult. This paper explores the potential benefits and limitations of synthetic data in the healthcare analytics context. We begin with real-world healthcare applications of synthetic data that informs government policy, enhance data privacy, and augment datasets for predictive analytics. We then preview future applications of synthetic data in the emergent field of digital twin technology. We explore the issues of data quality and data bias in synthetic data, which can limit applicability across different applications in the clinical context, and privacy concerns stemming from data misuse and risk of re-identification. Finally, we evaluate the role of regulatory agencies in promoting transparency and accountability and propose strategies for risk mitigation such as Differential Privacy (DP) and a dataset chain of custody to maintain data integrity, traceability, and accountability. Synthetic data can improve healthcare, but measures to protect patient well-being and maintain ethical standards are key to promote responsible use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41746-023-00927-3

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because synthetic data are similar to but not the same as real data, they can be used to eliminate or mask personal identifiers and protect the confidentiality of human participants.

    “because synthetic data are similar to but not the same as real data, they can be used to eliminate or mask personal identifiers and protect the confidentiality of human participants [31, 81, 200].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [6]Philpott, D. A Guide to Federal Terms and Acronyms: Bernan Press; (2017)
  2. [13]MDClone Launches New Phase of Collaboration with Washington University in St. Louis. [cited 31 October 2019]. In: MDClone News [Internet]. Available from: https://www.mdclone.com/news-press/articles/mdclone-washington-university-collaboration (2019).
  3. [27]Sun, Z., Wang, F., Hu, J. LINKAGE: An approach for comprehensive risk prediction for care management. In: Cao L., Zhang C., editors. Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Sydney, Australia. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2015. 1145–1154 (2015).
  4. [31]Das, H. P. et al Conditional Synthetic Data Generation for Robust Machine Learning Applications with Limited Pandemic Data arXiv:2109.0648609.06486arXiv:2109.06486Top of FormBottom of Form
  5. [40]Naeem, M. F., Oh, S. J., Uh, Y., Choi, Y. & Yoo, J. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 7176–7185 (PMLR, 2020).
  6. [41]Sajjadi, M. S., Bachem, O., Lucic, M., Bousquet, O. & Gelly, S. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2018).
  7. [42]Alaa, A. M., van Breugel, B., Saveliev, E. & van der Schaar, M. In International Conference on Machine Learning (2021).
  8. [70]Jordon, J., Yoon, J., & Van Der Schaar, M. PATE-GAN: Generating synthetic data with differential privacy guarantees. In International conference on learning representations. (2019).
  9. [72]Patel J Bhatt N Review of digital image forgery detection Int. J. Recent Innov. Trends Comput. Commun. 2017 5 152 155

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Giuffrè, M., & Shung, D. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Trieste (IT)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Giuffrè, Mauro
Venue
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2023-10-09
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
186-186
ISSN
2398-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387457231
Cited by
392
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 135 · 2025: 163 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 6
FWCI
4.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Digital Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001863)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
synthetic data, medical data analysis, data privacy, re-identification, differential privacy, digital twin, data bias, data quality, regulatory oversight, transparency and accountability, predictive analytics, patient data protection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review