Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 637

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification of active sites for acidic oxygen reduction on carbon catalysts with and without nitrogen doping

Open access
Jia, Yi, Zhang, Longzhou, Zhuang, Linzhou, Liu, Hongli, Yan, Xuecheng, Wang, Xin, Liu, Jiandang, Wang, Jiancheng, Zheng, Yarong, Xiao, Zhaohui, Taran, Elena, Chen, Jun, Yang, Dongjiang, Zhu, Zhonghua, Wang, Shuangyin, Dai, Liming, Yao, Xiangdong·2019·Nature Catalysis

Abstract

Owing to the difficulty in controlling the dopant or defect types and their homogeneity in carbon materials, it is still a controversial issue to identify the active sites of carbon-based metal-free catalysts. Here we report a proof-of-concept study on the active-site evaluation for a highly oriented pyrolytic graphite catalyst with specific pentagon carbon defective patterns (D-HOPG). It is demonstrated that specific carbon defect types (an edged pentagon in this work) could be selectively created via controllable nitrogen doping. Work-function analyses coupled with macro and micro-electrochemical performance measurements suggest that the pentagon defects in D-HOPG served as major active sites for the acidic oxygen reduction reaction, even much superior to the pyridinic nitrogen sites in nitrogen-doped highly oriented pyrolytic graphite. This work enables us to elucidate the relative importance of the specific carbon defects versus nitrogen-dopant species and their respective contributions to the observed overall acidic oxygen reduction reaction activity.The active sites of metal-free carbon catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction remain still elusive. Now, Yao, Dai and co-workers combine work-function analyses with macro/micro-electrochemical measurements on highly oriented pyrolytic graphite and conclude that pentagon defects are the main active sites for acidic oxygen reduction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41929-019-0297-4

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 637

Metadata

Authors
Jia, Y., Zhang, L., Zhuang, L., Liu, H., Yan, X., Wang, X., Liu, J., Wang, J., Zheng, Y., Xiao, Z., Taran, E., Chen, J., Yang, D., Zhu, Z., Wang, S., Dai, L., & Yao, X.
Venue
Nature Catalysis
Published
2019-06-17
Volume
2
Issue
8
Pages
688-695
ISSN
2520-1158 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2952165885
Cited by
637
References
3
FWCI
15.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of active sites for acidic oxygen reduction on carbon catalysts with and without nitrogen doping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41929-019-0297-4
The paper
Jia, Y., Zhang, L., Zhuang, L., Liu, H., Yan, X., Wang, X., Liu, J., Wang, J., Zheng, Y., Xiao, Z., Taran, E., Chen, J., Yang, D., Zhu, Z., Wang, S., Dai, L., & Yao, X. (2019). Identification of active sites for acidic oxygen reduction on carbon catalysts with and without nitrogen doping. Nature Catalysis. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-019-0297-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.