Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 335

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tuning of catalytic sites in Pt/TiO2 catalysts for the chemoselective hydrogenation of 3-nitrostyrene

Open access
Macino, Margherita, Barnes, Alexandra J., Althahban, Sultan M., Qu, Ruiyang, Gibson, Emma K., Morgan, David J, Freakley, Simon J., Dimitratos, Nikolaos, Kiely, Christopher J., Gao, Xiang, Beale, Andrew M., Bethell, Donald, He, Qian, Sankar, Meenakshisundaram, Hutchings, Graham J.·2019·Nature Catalysis

Abstract

The catalytic activities of supported metal nanoparticles can be tuned by appropriate design of synthesis strategies. Each step in a catalyst synthesis method can play an important role in preparing the most efficient catalyst. Here we report the careful manipulation of the post-synthetic heat treatment procedure—together with control over the metal loading—to prepare a highly efficient 0.2 wt% Pt/TiO2 catalyst for the chemoselective hydrogenation of 3-nitrostyrene. For Pt/TiO2 catalysts with 0.2 and 0.5 wt% loading levels, reduction at 450 °C induces the coverage of TiOx over Pt nanoparticles through a strong metal–support interaction, which is detrimental to their catalytic activities. However, this can be avoided by following calcination treatment with reduction (both at 450 °C), allowing us to prepare an exceptionally active catalyst. Detailed characterization has revealed that the peripheral sites at the Pt/TiO2 interface are the most likely active sites for this hydrogenation reaction. Small changes in catalyst synthesis can have large and often poorly understood effects on activity. Here the authors show how variation of post synthetic heat treatment—in combination with changes in metal loadings—can lead to the most efficient catalysts, and also identify the most likely active sites.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41929-019-0334-3

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 335

Metadata

Authors
Macino, M., Barnes, A. J., Althahban, S. M., Qu, R., Gibson, E. K., Morgan, D. J., Freakley, S. J., Dimitratos, N., Kiely, C. J., Gao, X., Beale, A. M., Bethell, D., He, Q., Sankar, M., & Hutchings, G. J.
Venue
Nature Catalysis
Published
2019-09-16
Volume
2
Issue
10
Pages
873-881
ISSN
2520-1158 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2969440348
Cited by
335
References
2
FWCI
11.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tuning of catalytic sites in Pt/TiO2 catalysts for the chemoselective hydrogenation of 3-nitrostyrene. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41929-019-0334-3
The paper
Macino, M., Barnes, A. J., Althahban, S. M., Qu, R., Gibson, E. K., Morgan, D. J., Freakley, S. J., Dimitratos, N., Kiely, C. J., Gao, X., Beale, A. M., Bethell, D., He, Q., Sankar, M., & Hutchings, G. J. (2019). Tuning of catalytic sites in Pt/TiO2 catalysts for the chemoselective hydrogenation of 3-nitrostyrene. Nature Catalysis. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-019-0334-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.