The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tuning of catalytic sites in Pt/TiO2 catalysts for the chemoselective hydrogenation of 3-nitrostyrene
Open accessAbstract
The catalytic activities of supported metal nanoparticles can be tuned by appropriate design of synthesis strategies. Each step in a catalyst synthesis method can play an important role in preparing the most efficient catalyst. Here we report the careful manipulation of the post-synthetic heat treatment procedure—together with control over the metal loading—to prepare a highly efficient 0.2 wt% Pt/TiO2 catalyst for the chemoselective hydrogenation of 3-nitrostyrene. For Pt/TiO2 catalysts with 0.2 and 0.5 wt% loading levels, reduction at 450 °C induces the coverage of TiOx over Pt nanoparticles through a strong metal–support interaction, which is detrimental to their catalytic activities. However, this can be avoided by following calcination treatment with reduction (both at 450 °C), allowing us to prepare an exceptionally active catalyst. Detailed characterization has revealed that the peripheral sites at the Pt/TiO2 interface are the most likely active sites for this hydrogenation reaction. Small changes in catalyst synthesis can have large and often poorly understood effects on activity. Here the authors show how variation of post synthetic heat treatment—in combination with changes in metal loadings—can lead to the most efficient catalysts, and also identify the most likely active sites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S., & Eliceiri, K. W. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2089 · Cited by 64,638
Strong metal-support interactions. Group 8 noble metals supported on titanium dioxide
Tauster, S. J., Fung, S. C., & Garten, R. L. (1978) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00469a029 · Cited by 3,188
Cited by
Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Qian, K., & Huang, W. (2022) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.1c04854 · Cited by 538
Metal–support interactions in metal oxide-supported atomic, cluster, and nanoparticle catalysis
Leybo, D., Etim, U. J., Monai, M., Bare, S. R., Zhong, Z., & Vogt, C. (2024) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d4cs00527a · Cited by 417
Structure Sensitivity of Au‐TiO2 Strong Metal–Support Interactions
Zhang, Y., Liu, J., Qian, K., Jia, A., Li, D., Shi, L., Hu, J., Zhu, J., & Huang, W. (2021) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202101928 · Cited by 341
Metadata
- Authors
- Macino, M., Barnes, A. J., Althahban, S. M., Qu, R., Gibson, E. K., Morgan, D. J., Freakley, S. J., Dimitratos, N., Kiely, C. J., Gao, X., Beale, A. M., Bethell, D., He, Q., Sankar, M., & Hutchings, G. J.
- Venue
- Nature Catalysis
- Published
- 2019-09-16
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 873-881
- ISSN
- 2520-1158 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2969440348
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tuning of catalytic sites in Pt/TiO2 catalysts for the chemoselective hydrogenation of 3-nitrostyrene. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41929-019-0334-3
- The paper
- Macino, M., Barnes, A. J., Althahban, S. M., Qu, R., Gibson, E. K., Morgan, D. J., Freakley, S. J., Dimitratos, N., Kiely, C. J., Gao, X., Beale, A. M., Bethell, D., He, Q., Sankar, M., & Hutchings, G. J. (2019). Tuning of catalytic sites in Pt/TiO2 catalysts for the chemoselective hydrogenation of 3-nitrostyrene. Nature Catalysis. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-019-0334-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.