Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 538

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 127 of the 127 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Metal–Support Interactions in Metal/Oxide Catalysts and Oxide–Metal Interactions in Oxide/Metal Inverse Catalysts

Li, Yangyang, Zhang, Yunshang, Qian, Kun, Huang, Weixin·2022·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

Solid catalysts usually consist of multicomponents, within which interfacial interactions have been recognized as a key factor affecting structures and catalytic performance. Metal–support interactions (MSI) have been extensively studied in oxide-supported metal catalysts (metal/oxide catalysts), in which the important concepts of strong metal–support interactions (SMSI) and electronic metal–support interactions (EMSI) have been well established and their effects on the metal catalysis have been extensively demonstrated. Recently, metal-supported oxide inverse catalysts (oxide/metal inverse catalysts) have emerged as a new type of efficient catalysts, in which the oxide–metal interactions (OMI) strongly influence the oxide catalysis. Herein we comprehensively review the progresses on the MSI of metal/oxide catalysts and OMI of oxide/metal inverse catalysts with aims to emphasize structure sensitivity of MSI and OMI and to introduce the concepts of electronic oxide–metal interactions (EOMI) and electronic oxide–metal strong interactions (EOMSI) in oxide/metal inverse catalysts, in analogy to the concepts of EMSI and SMSI in metal/oxide catalysts. First, we briefly introduce the background of the topic and the interfacial interactions between metals and oxides with emphasis on the nature of metal–support interfacial interactions depending on the electronic structures. Second, the MSI, with an emphasis on the EMSI and SMSI, in metal/oxide catalysts is reviewed with an emphasis on the recently exported size and facet effects on the electronic structures and MSI. Third, the OMI in oxide/metal inverse catalysts is reviewed with an emphasis on introducing the EOMI and EOMSI. Finally, a summary and outlook is given with emphasis on the local nature and structure sensitivity of MSI and OMI.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.1c04854

Cites

127 of 127 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 127 references

Cited by

See all 538

Metadata

Authors
Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Qian, K., & Huang, W.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2022-01-06
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
1268-1287
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4205412029
Cited by
538
References
127
FWCI
27.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metal–Support Interactions in Metal/Oxide Catalysts and Oxide–Metal Interactions in Oxide/Metal Inverse Catalysts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acscatal.1c04854
The paper
Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Qian, K., & Huang, W. (2022). Metal–Support Interactions in Metal/Oxide Catalysts and Oxide–Metal Interactions in Oxide/Metal Inverse Catalysts. ACS Catalysis. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c04854

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.