The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RetroBioCat as a computer-aided synthesis planning tool for biocatalytic reactions and cascades
Open accessAbstract
As the enzyme toolbox for biocatalysis has expanded, so has the potential for the construction of powerful enzymatic cascades for efficient and selective synthesis of target molecules. Additionally, recent advances in computer-aided synthesis planning are revolutionizing synthesis design in both synthetic biology and organic chemistry. However, the potential for biocatalysis is not well captured by tools currently available in either field. Here we present RetroBioCat, an intuitive and accessible tool for computer-aided design of biocatalytic cascades, freely available at retrobiocat.com. Our approach uses a set of expertly encoded reaction rules encompassing the enzyme toolbox for biocatalysis, and a system for identifying literature precedent for enzymes with the correct substrate specificity where this is available. Applying these rules for automated biocatalytic retrosynthesis, we show our tool to be capable of identifying promising biocatalytic pathways to target molecules, validated using a test set of recent cascades described in the literature. Biocatalytic methods are lacking in current computer-aided synthesis planning tools. Now, RetroBioCat allows computer-aided design of biocatalytic cascades for organic synthesis and synthetic biology. The program was validated using reported cascades and is freely available at retrobiocat.com.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Machine Learning in Computer-Aided Synthesis Planning
Coley, C. W., Green, W. H., & Jensen, K. F. (2018) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00087 · Cited by 704
Computer‐Assisted Synthetic Planning: The End of the Beginning
Szymkuć, S., Gajewska, E. P., Klucznik, T., Molga, K., Dittwald, P., Startek, M., Bajczyk, M., & Grzybowski, B. A. (2016) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201506101 · Cited by 611
Chematica: A Story of Computer Code That Started to Think like a Chemist
Grzybowski, B. A., Szymkuć, S., Gajewska, E. P., Molga, K., Dittwald, P., Wołos, A., & Klucznik, T. (2018) · Chem · doi:10.1016/j.chempr.2018.02.024 · Cited by 114
Cited by
Machine learning modeling of family wide enzyme-substrate specificity screens
Goldman, S., Das, R., Yang, K. K., & Coley, C. W. (2022) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009853 · Cited by 120
The Beauty of Biocatalysis: Sustainable Synthesis of Ingredients in Cosmetics
Heath, R. S., Ruscoe, R. E., & Turner, N. J. (2022) · Natural Product Reports · doi:10.1039/d1np00027f · Cited by 65
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Finnigan, W., Hepworth, L. J., Flitsch, S. L., & Turner, N. J.
- Venue
- Nature Catalysis
- Published
- 2021-01-04
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 98-104
- ISSN
- 2520-1158 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3120686965
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.