Cited by 115Computational Drug Discovery MethodsAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningMachine Learning in Materials Science

Chematica: A Story of Computer Code That Started to Think like a Chemist

Open access
Grzybowski, Bartosz A., Szymkuć, Sara, Gajewska, Ewa P., Molga, Karol, Dittwald, Piotr, Wołos, Agnieszka, Klucznik, Tomasz·2018·Chem

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.02.024

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grzybowski, B. A., Szymkuć, S., Gajewska, E. P., Molga, K., Dittwald, P., Wołos, A., & Klucznik, T.
Venue
Chem
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
390-398
ISSN
2451-9294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2789913372
Cited by
114
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7
FWCI
6.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chem (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarworks@UNIST (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
Keywords
cheminformatics software, artificial intelligence in chemistry, retrosynthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review