Generative machine learning produces kinetic models that accurately characterize intracellular metabolic states
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract Generating large omics datasets has become routine practice to gain insights into cellular processes, yet deciphering such massive datasets and determining intracellular metabolic states remains challenging. Kinetic models of metabolism play a critical role in integrating omics data, as they provide explicit connections between metabolite concentrations, metabolic fluxes, and enzyme levels. Nevertheless, the challenges associated with determining the kinetic parameters that underlie cellular physiology pose significant obstacles to the broader acceptance and adoption of these models within the research community. Here, we present RENAISSANCE, a generative machine learning framework for efficiently parameterizing large-scale kinetic models with dynamic properties matching experimental observations. Through seamless integration and consolidation of diverse omics data and other relevant information, like extracellular medium composition, physicochemical data, and expertise of domain specialists, we show that the proposed framework accurately characterizes unknown intracellular metabolic states, including metabolic fluxes and metabolite concentrations in E. coli ’s metabolic network. Moreover, we show that RENAISSANCE successfully estimates missing kinetic parameters and reconciles them with sparse and noisy experimental data, resulting in a substantial reduction in parameter uncertainty and a notable improvement in the accuracy and reliability of the parameter estimates. The proposed framework will be invaluable for researchers who seek to analyze metabolic variations involving changes in metabolite and enzyme levels and enzyme activity in health and biotechnological studies.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Fundamentals of Cancer Metabolism
DeBerardinis, R. J., & Chandel, N. S. (2016) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1600200 · Cited by 3,013 · see citing works
An Introduction to Variational Autoencoders
Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2019) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000056 · Cited by 2,609 · see citing works
BRENDA, the ELIXIR core data resource in 2021: new developments and updates
Chang, A., Jeske, L., Ulbrich, S., Hofmann, J., Koblitz, J., Schomburg, I., Neumann-Schaal, M., Jahn, D., & Schomburg, D. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa1025 · Cited by 789 · see citing works
Constraining the metabolic genotype–phenotype relationship using a phylogeny of in silico methods
Lewis, N. E., Nagarajan, H., & Palsson, B. O. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2737 · Cited by 779 · see citing works
Deep learning-based kcat prediction enables improved enzyme-constrained model reconstruction
Li, F., Yuan, L., Lu, H., Li, G., Chen, Y., Engqvist, M. K. M., Kerkhoven, E. J., & Nielsen, J. (2022) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-022-00798-z · Cited by 466 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These results suggest that integrating only a small amount of experimental data, localized to one enzyme (ACONTa,b), propagates throughout the metabolic network and alters the rest of the kinetic parameters.”
BackgroundMetabolite concentrations, fluxes and free energies imply efficient enzyme usage
Park, J. O., Rubin, S. A., Xu, Y.-F., Amador-Noguez, D., Fan, J., Shlomi, T., & Rabinowitz, J. D. (2016) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.2077 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Reconstructing organisms in silico: genome-scale models and their emerging applications
Fang, X., Lloyd, C. J., & Palsson, B. O. (2020) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-020-00440-4 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Khodayari, A., & Maranas, C. D. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13806 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Choudhury, S., Narayanan, B., Moret, M., Hatzimanikatis, V., & Miskovic, L.
- Affiliations
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Venue
- Nature Catalysis
- Published
- 2024-08-30
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1086-1098
- ISSN
- 2520-1158 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11499278
- OpenAlex
- W4402061016
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 8.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Catalysis (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (200021_188623)
- EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (814408)
- Vetenskapsrådet (2016-06160)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Keywords
- kinetic parameter estimation, generative machine learning, Escherichia coli metabolism, metabolic flux estimation, metabolite concentrations, multi-omics integration, parameter uncertainty reduction, enzyme activity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review