An Introduction to Variational Autoencoders
Open accessAbstract
Variational autoencoders provide a principled framework for learning deep latent-variable models and corresponding inference models. In this work, we provide an introduction to variational autoencoders and some important extensions.
Verified 2026-10-10 · 2 references not checked yet
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This monograph introduces variational autoencoders (VAEs) as a framework for jointly learning deep latent-variable models and amortized inference models via stochastic gradient descent on the evidence lower bound (ELBO). It also reviews extensions including inverse autoregressive flows, auxiliary latent variables, and deeper generative models.
Key findings
- A VAE couples a generative model \(p_\theta(x,z)\) with an inference/recognition model \(q_\phi(z|x)\); maximizing the ELBO \(L_{\theta,\phi}(x)=E_{q_\phi(z|x)}[\log p_\theta(x,z)-\log q_\phi(z|x)]\) simultaneously improves the marginal likelihood and tightens the posterior approximation (eqs. 2.10–2.12).
- The reparameterization trick expresses continuous latent variables as \(z=g(\epsilon,\phi,x)\), enabling unbiased, low-variance gradients of the ELBO with respect to both generative and variational parameters (section 2.4).
- Inverse autoregressive flow (IAF) is proposed as a normalizing flow that scales to high-dimensional latent spaces and has a simple log-determinant, improving posterior flexibility (chapter 3).
- The text reports follow-up results: VAE-based semi-supervised MNIST classification with under 1% error using only 10 labeled images per class; VAE semi-supervised ImageNet accuracy around 45% with 1% labels versus GoogLeNet around 5%; free bits worked for \(\lambda \in [0.125,0.25,0.5,1,2]\); and a 100x improvement in synthesis speed for parallelizable models.
Methods
- Design: an introductory monograph/tutorial, described as an expanded version of Kingma and Welling (2014), covering background, VAE basics, advanced inference techniques, and advanced generative models.
- Data or sample: no new empirical dataset is introduced; the work discusses methods and cites applications and experiments from the literature, including CIFAR-10, MNIST, ImageNet, chemical design, natural-language synthesis, astronomy, and image resynthesis.
- Main analysis: mathematical derivation of the ELBO, reparameterization gradients, factorized and full-covariance Gaussian posteriors, importance-sampling marginal-likelihood estimation, normalizing flows/IAF, and autoregressive/invertible generative models.
Limitations
- Stated: “This is not aimed to be a comprehensive review of all related work,” and the reader is assumed to have basic knowledge of algebra, calculus, and probability theory.
- Stated challenges: unmodified ELBO optimization can get stuck in an undesirable stable equilibrium; blurriness arises from the direction of the KL divergence; importance-weighted estimates scale poorly to high-dimensional latent spaces; autoregressive sampling is sequential with \(O(D)\) computation; and normalizing flows constrain intermediate states to the data dimensionality.
- Evident: as an introduction/review, the paper does not present a new controlled empirical benchmark; many numerical results are cited from other papers rather than original experiments.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 76 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingcitation
Stochastic optimization with the unmodified lower bound objective can get stuck in an undesirable stable equilibrium.
“In our work, consistent with findings in (Bowman et al., 2015) and (Sønderby et al., 2016a), we found that stochastic optimization with the unmodified lower bound objective can gets stuck in an undesirable stable equilibrium.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bowman et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sønderby et al., 2016a
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given
Reversing the ordering of the variables after each step in the IAF chain improved results.
“It was found that results improved when reversing the ordering of the variables after each step in the IAF chain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The framework of variational autoencoders provides a principled method for jointly learning deep latent-variable models and corresponding inference models using stochastic gradient descent.
“The framework of variational autoencoders (VAEs) (Kingma and Welling, 2014;Rezende et al., 2014) provides a principled method for jointly learning deep latent-variable models and corresponding inference models using stochastic gradient descent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kingma and Welling, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rezende et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
The VAE learning rules follow from a single approximation to the maximum likelihood objective.
“The VAE learning rules instead follow from a single approximation to the maximum likelihood objective.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In the VAE framework, sampling induces sampling noise in the gradients required for learning.
“However the price we pay is that this sampling induces sampling noise in the gradients required for learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Interpretationreasoning
With minibatches, we can form an unbiased estimator of the maximum likelihood criterion.
“With such minibatches we can form an unbiased estimator of the ML criterion:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
One advantage of the VAE framework relative to ordinary variational inference is that the recognition model is a stochastic function of the input variables.
“One advantage of the VAE framework, relative to ordinary Variational Inference (VI), is that the recognition model (also called inference model) is now a (stochastic) function of the input variables.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Computation of the batch gradient descent derivative is expensive for large dataset size because it scales linearly with the number of datapoints.
“Computation of this derivative is, however, an expensive operation for large dataset size N D , since it scales linearly with N D .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
Probabilistic models based on neural networks are computationally scalable because they allow for stochastic gradient-based optimization.
“Probabilistic models based on neural networks are computationally scalable since they allow for stochastic gradient-based optimization which, as we will explain, allows scaling to large models and large datasets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
For continuous latent variables and a differentiable encoder and generative model, the ELBO can be straightforwardly differentiated with respect to both φ and θ through a change of variables, also called the reparameterization trick.
“For continuous latent variables and a differentiable encoder and generative model, the ELBO can be straightforwardly differentiated w.r.t.both φ and θ through a change of variables, also called the reparameterization trick (Kingma andWelling, 2014 andRezende et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kingma andWelling, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rezende et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Due to the intractability of the marginal likelihood, we cannot differentiate it with respect to its parameters and optimize it, as we can with fully observed models.
“Due to this intractability, we cannot differentiate it w.r.t.its parameters and optimize it, as we can with fully observed models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Computation of the ELBO estimator requires computation of the density log qφ(z|x), which is simple as long as the right transformation g() is chosen.
“Computation of the (estimator of) the ELBO requires computation of the density log q φ (z|x), given a value of x, and given a value of z or equivalently .This log-density is a simple computation, as long as we choose the right transformation g().”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Traditional variational inference methods do not share variational parameters but instead separately and iteratively optimize them per datapoint.
“This can be contrasted to more traditional variational inference methods where the variational parameters are not shared, but instead separately and iteratively optimized per datapoint.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
For continuous latent variables, a reparameterization trick can compute unbiased estimates of the gradient of the ELBO with respect to θ and φ.
“In the case of continuous latent variables, we can use a reparameterization trick for computing unbiased estimates of ∇ θ,φ L θ,φ (x), as we will now discuss.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kingma and Welling, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rezende et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
The ELBO allows joint optimization with respect to all parameters (φ and θ) using stochastic gradient descent.
“An important property of the ELBO, is that it allows joint optimization w.r.t.all parameters (φ and θ) using stochastic gradient descent (SGD).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Given a dataset with i.i.d. data, the ELBO objective is the sum (or average) of individual-datapoint ELBOs.
“Given a dataset with i.i.d.data, the ELBO objective is the sum (or average) of individual-datapoint ELBO's:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The datapoints in dataset D are independent samples from an unchanging underlying distribution.
- Premisereasoning
The main difficulty of maximum likelihood learning in deep latent-variable models is that the marginal probability of data under the model is typically intractable.
“The main difficulty of maximum likelihood learning in DLVMs is that the marginal probability of data under the model is typically intractable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The reparameterized gradient is an unbiased estimator of the exact single-datapoint ELBO gradient.
“This gradient is an unbiased estimator of the exact single-datapoint ELBO gradient; when averaged over noise ∼ p( ), this gradient equals the single-datapoint ELBO gradient:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The approximation to the posterior provided by the inference model helps us optimize the marginal likelihood.
“As we will explain, this approximation to the posterior help us optimize the marginal likelihood.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Due to the non-negativity of the KL divergence, the ELBO is a lower bound on the log-likelihood of the data.
“Due to the non-negativity of the KL divergence, the ELBO is a lower bound on the log-likelihood of the data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Unbiased gradients with respect to the variational parameters φ are more difficult to obtain because the ELBO's expectation is taken with respect to qφ(z|x), which is a function of φ.
“Unbiased gradients w.r.t. the variational parameters φ are more difficult to obtain, since the ELBO's expectation is taken w.r.t. the distribution q φ (z|x), which is a function of φ.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The intractability of the marginal likelihood pθ(x) is due to the integral for computing it not having an analytic solution or efficient estimator.
“This is due to the integral in equation (1.13) for computing the marginal likelihood (or model evidence), p θ (x) = p θ (x, z) dz, not having an analytic solution or efficient estimator.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The intractability of the marginal likelihood pθ(x) is related to the intractability of the posterior distribution pθ(z|x).
“The intractability of p θ (x), is related to the intractability of the posterior distribution p θ (z|x).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
One important advantage of deep latent-variable models is that even when each factor in the directed model is relatively simple, the marginal distribution pθ(x) can be very complex, containing almost arbitrary dependencies.
“One important advantage of DLVMs, is that even when each factor (prior or conditional distribution) in the directed model is relatively simple (such as conditional Gaussian), the marginal distribution p θ (x) can be very complex, i.e. contain almost arbitrary dependen-cies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Under the reparameterization, we can replace an expectation with respect to qφ(z|x) with one with respect to p(ε).
“Under the reparameterization, we can replace an expectation w.r.t.q φ (z|x) with one w.r.t.p( ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The distribution of the noise random variable ε is independent of x or φ.
- Premisenone given
The VAE framework provides a computationally efficient way for optimizing deep latent-variable models jointly with a corresponding inference model using stochastic gradient descent.
“The framework of variational autoencoders (VAEs) provides a computationally efficient way for optimizing DLVMs jointly with a corresponding inference model using SGD.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Unbiased gradients of the ELBO with respect to the generative model parameters θ are simple to obtain.
“Unbiased gradients of the ELBO w.r.t. the generative model parameters θ are simple to obtain:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Setting L = 1 in the importance sampling estimator equals the ELBO estimator of the VAE.
“Notice that when setting L = 1, this equals the ELBO estimator of the VAE.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
After training a VAE, the probability of data under the model can be estimated using an importance sampling technique, as originally proposed by Rezende et al., 2014.
“After training a VAE, we can estimate the probability of data under the model using an importance sampling technique, as originally proposed by Rezende et al., 2014.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rezende et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
As long as g(.) is an invertible function, the densities of ε and z are related by log qφ(z|x) = log p(ε) minus the log-determinant of the transformation from ε to z.
“As long as g(.) is an invertible function, the densities of and z are related as: log q φ (z|x) = log p( ) -log d φ (x, )”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The transformation g(.) is invertible.
- Premisecitation
The IWAE objective can be re-interpreted as an ELBO objective with a particular inference model.
“It was later shown by Cremer et al., 2017 that the IWAE objective can be re-interpreted as an ELBO objective with a particular inference model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cremer et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The importance weighted autoencoder (IWAE) objective has increasing tightness for increasing value of L.
“In that paper, it was also shown that the objective has increasing tightness for increasing value of L.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Burda et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
In the full-covariance Gaussian parameterization z = μ + Lε, log |det(∂z/∂ε)| = Σ_i log |L_ii|.
“log | det( ∂z ∂ )| = i log |L ii | (2.48)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The log density of the factorized Gaussian posterior is Σ_i log N(ε_i;0,1) - log σ_i when z = g(ε,φ,x).
“log q φ (z|x) = log p( ) -log d φ (x, ) (2.43) = i log N ( i ; 0, 1) -log σ i (2.44)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
This principle of simple log determinants for triangular Jacobians is used by inverse autoregressive flow (IAF) as explored by Kingma et al., 2016.
“This principle is used by inverse autoregressive flow (IAF) as explored by Kingma et al., 2016 and discussed in chapter 3.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kingma et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Minimization of the KL divergence D_KL(q_D(x)||pθ(x)) is equivalent to maximization of the data log-likelihood log pθ(D).
“So minimization of the KL divergence above is equivalent to maximization of the data log-likelihood log p θ (D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The full-covariance parameterization z = μ + Lε corresponds to the Cholesky decomposition Σ = LL^T of the covariance of z.
“This parameterization corresponds to the Cholesky decomposition Σ = LL T of the covariance of z:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A full-covariance Gaussian posterior can be reparameterized as z = μ + Lε, where L is lower (or upper) triangular with non-zero diagonal entries, and its off-diagonal elements define the correlations (covariances) of the elements in z.
“where L is a lower (or upper) triangular matrix, with non-zero entries on the diagonal.The off-diagonal elements define the correlations (covariances) of the elements in z.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
More generally, replacing z = Lε + μ with a chain of differentiable nonlinear transformations, if the Jacobian of each step is triangular with non-zero diagonal entries, the log determinant remains simple.
“More generally, we can replace z = L + µ with a chain of (differentiable and nonlinear) transformations; as long as the Jacobian of each step in the chain is triangular with non-zero diagonal entries, the log determinant remains simple.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Maximization of the ELBO is equivalent to minimization of the KL divergence D_KL(q_D,φ(x,z)||pθ(x,z)).
“So maximization of the ELBO, is equivalent to the minimization of this KL divergence D KL (q D,φ (x, z)||p θ (x, z)).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The Monte Carlo importance sampling estimator of log pθ(x) converges to the actual marginal likelihood as L → ∞.
“By making L large, the approximation becomes a better estimate of the marginal likelihood, and in fact since this is a Monte Carlo estimator, for L → ∞ this converges to the actual marginal likelihood.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
When L is constructed as L_mask L + diag(σ), the log determinant of the Jacobian is identical to the factorized Gaussian case: Σ_i log σ_i.
“The log-determinant is therefore identical to the factorized Gaussian case:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
For a factorized Gaussian posterior reparameterized as z = μ + σ ⊙ ε, the log determinant of the Jacobian from ε to z is Σ_i log σ_i.
“log d φ (x, ) = log det ∂z ∂ = i log σ i (2.42)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Auxiliary latent variables are a method for improving the flexibility of inference models.
“One method for improving the flexibility of inference models, is through the introduction of auxiliary latent variables, as explored by Salimans et al., 2015, (Ranganath et al., 2016) and Maaløe et al., 2016.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Salimans et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ranganath et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Maaløe et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The score function estimator is an alternative unbiased stochastic gradient estimator of the ELBO.
“An alternative unbiased stochastic gradient estimator of the ELBO is the score function estimator (Kleijnen and Rubinstein, 1996):”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kleijnen and Rubinstein, 1996
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
If a perfect fit between q_D,φ(x,z) and pθ(x,z) is not possible, then the variance of pθ(x,z) and pθ(x) will end up larger than the variance of q_D,φ(x,z) and the data q_D,φ(x).
“If a perfect fit between q D,φ (x, z) and p θ (x, z) is not possible, then the variance of p θ (x, z) and p θ (x) will end up larger than the variance q D,φ (x, z) and the data q D,φ (x).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The score function estimator generally leads to much higher variance than reparameterization-based estimators because it uses only the scalar-valued log pθ(x,z) and ignores gradient information.
“The score function estimator solely uses the scalar-valued log p θ (x, z), ignoring the gradient information about the function log p θ (x, z), generally leading to much higher variance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A sophisticated score function estimator requires two orders of magnitude more samples to arrive at the same variance as a reparameterization-based estimator.
“This has been experimentally confirmed by e.g.(Kucukelbir et al., 2017), which finds that a sophisticated score function estimator requires two orders of magnitude more samples to arrive at the same variance as a reparameterization based estimator.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kucukelbir et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The free bits method worked well for λ ∈ [0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2], resulting in significant improvement in log-likelihood on a benchmark result.
“In Kingma et al., 2016 it was found that the method worked well for a fairly wide range of values (λ ∈ [0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2]), resulting in significant improvement in the resulting log-likelihood on a benchmark result.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kingma et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
The density q(z|x) must be sufficiently flexible to match the true posterior p(z|x) in order to arrive at a tight bound.
“However, as explained, we also need the density q(z|x) to be sufficiently flexible to match the true posterior p(z|x), in order to arrive at a tight bound.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
If z is high-dimensional and parallel computational resources like GPUs are used, parallelizability of density computation and sampling across dimensions of z is a large factor towards efficiency.
“If z is high-dimensional and we want to make efficient use of parallel computational resources like GPUs, then parallelizability of these operations across dimensions of z is a large factor towards efficiency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A proposed solution to the stable equilibrium problem is to use an optimization schedule where the weight of the latent cost D_KL(q(z|x)||p(z)) is slowly annealed from 0 to 1 over many epochs.
“The solution proposed in (Bowman et al., 2015) and (Sønderby et al., 2016a) is to use an optimization schedule where the weights of the latent cost D KL (q(z|x)||p(z)) is slowly annealed from 0 to 1 over many epochs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bowman et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sønderby et al., 2016a
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
The VAE training algorithm exposes a connection between directed probabilistic models trained with a variational objective and autoencoders.
“The VAE training algorithm exposes a connection between directed probabilistic models (trained with a variational objective) and autoencoders.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The tractability requirements restrict the class of approximate posteriors q(z|x) that are practical to use, often leading to simple Gaussian posteriors.
“This requirement restricts the class of approximate posteriors q(z|x) that are practical to use.In practice this often leads to the use of simple Gaussian posteriors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The inverse autoregressive operation has a simple Jacobian determinant.
“The second key observation, is that this inverse autoregressive operation has a simple Jacobian determinant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The combination of model flexibility, parallelizability across dimensions, and simple log-determinant makes the inverse autoregressive transformation interesting for use as a normalizing flow over high-dimensional latent space.
“The combination of model flexibility, parallelizability across dimensions, and simple log-determinant, makes this transformation interesting for use as a normalizing flow over high-dimensional latent space.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The planar flow of Rezende and Mohamed, 2015 does not scale well to a high-dimensional latent space because information goes through a single bottleneck, requiring a long chain to capture high-dimensional dependencies.
“This flow does not scale well to a high-dimensional latent space: since information goes through the single bottleneck, a long chain of transformations is required to capture high-dimensional dependencies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rezende and Mohamed, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
As long as the Jacobian determinant of each transformation f_t can be computed, the probability density function of the last iterate can be computed.
“As long as the Jacobian determinant of each of the transformations f t can be computed, we can still compute the probability density function of the last iterate:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A Hamiltonian Variational Inference transformation could take us arbitrarily close to the exact posterior distribution if applied a sufficient number of times.
“Such a transformation could thus take us arbitrarily close to the exact posterior distribution if we can apply it a sufficient number of times.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In principle, the ELBO gets worse by augmenting the VAE with an auxiliary variable u: D_KL(q_D,φ(x,z,u)||pθ(x,z,u)) ≥ D_KL(q_D,φ(x,z)||pθ(x,z)).
“From this equation it can be seen that in principle, the ELBO gets worse by augmenting the VAE with an auxiliary variable u:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
The scalar value log pθ(x,z) - log qφ(z|x) is an unbiased stochastic estimate lower bound on log pθ(x).
“This scalar is the unbiased stochastic estimate lower bound on log p θ (x).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The ELBO objective with auxiliary variables is equivalent to minimization of a KL divergence D_KL(q_D,φ(x,z,u)||pθ(x,z,u)).
“The ELBO objective with auxiliary variables, given empirical distribution q D (x), is then (again) equivalent to minimization of a KL divergence:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The flexibility of the final iterate of IAF and its ability to closely fit the true posterior increases with the expressivity of the autoregressive models and the depth of the chain.
“The flexibility of the distribution of the final iterate T , and its ability to closely fit to the true posterior, increases with the expressivity of the autoregressive models and the depth of the chain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
The choice of latent variables' topological ordering for the inference model can be different from the choice of ordering for the generative model.
“It should be noted that the choice of latent variables' topological ordering for the inference model can be different from the choice of ordering for the generative model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
If pθ(xj|Pa(xj)) factorizes into independent univariate Gaussians whose means and variances are nonlinear functions of the parents, then computations for synthesis and log-likelihood evaluation can be fully parallelized across dimensions.
“For example, if we let p θ (x j |P a(x j )) = k p θ (x j,k |P a(x j )), where each factor is a univariate Gaussian whose means and variance are nonlinear functions (specified by a neural network) of the parents P a(x j ), then computations for both synthesis and evaluation of log-likelihood can be fully parallelized across dimensions k.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Letting the two distributions share parameters allows for more complicated posteriors, like normalizing flows or IAF.
“In general, we can let the two distributions share parameters.This allows for more complicated posteriors, like normalizing flows or IAF.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Synthesis from fully autoregressive models is relatively slow because the length of computation for synthesis is linear in the dimensionality of the data.
“Synthesis from fully autoregressive models models is relatively slow, since the length of computation for synthesis from such models is linear in the dimensionality of the data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
It can be advantageous to let the generative model and inference model share the topological ordering of latent variables.
“In multiple works (Salimans, 2016;Sønderby et al., 2016a;Kingma et al., 2016) it has been shown that it can be advantageous to let the generative model and inference model share the topological ordering of latent variables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Salimans, 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sønderby et al., 2016a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kingma et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
It is relatively straightforward and computationally attractive, due to parallelizability, to specify directed models over high-dimensional variables where each conditional factorizes into independent distributions.
“It is relatively straightforward and computationally attractive, due to parallelizability, to specify directed models over high-dimensional variables where each conditional factorizes into independent distributions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The techniques of autoregressive models and invertible transformations can be naturally combined with variational autoencoders.
“The techniques of autoregressive models and invertible transformations can be naturally combined with variational autoencoders, and at the time of writing, the best systems use a combination Rezende and Mohamed, 2015;Kingma et al., 2016;Gulrajani et al., 2017.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Rezende and Mohamed, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kingma et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gulrajani et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Experiments in Kingma et al., 2016 demonstrate a 100x improvement in speed of synthesis.
“See (Kingma et al., 2016) for experiments demonstrating a 100x improvement in speed of synthesis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kingma et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A semi-supervised approach with VAEs achieves around 45% classification accuracy on the same task when modeling labels jointly with labeled and unlabeled input images.
“In contrast, they show that a semi-supervised approach with VAEs achieves around 45% classification accuracy on the same task, when modeling the labels jointly with the labeled and unlabeled input images.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pu et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
An advantage of normalizing flows is that the likelihood and its gradient are tractable.
“An obvious advantage, on the other hand, is that the likelihood and its gradient are tractable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
VAE-based semi-supervised learning can do well when only a single sample per class is presented.
“In concurrent work (Rezende et al., 2016a), it was shown that VAE-based semi-supervised learning can even do well when only a single sample per class is presented.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rezende et al., 2016a
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
GoogLeNet achieves only around 5% top-1 classification accuracy on ImageNet when trained with only 1% of the labeled images.
“A standard supervised approach, GoogLeNet (Szegedy et al., 2015), which normally achieves near state-of-the-art performance on the Ima-geNet validation set, achieves only around 5% top-1 classification accuracy when trained with only 1% of the labeled images, as shown by Pu et al., 2016.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pu et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Since real data is limited, deep generative models can be used for synthesis of pseudo-data to calibrate lensing systems.
“Since real data is still limited, the proposed solution is to use deep generative models for synthesis of pseudo-data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ravanbakhsh et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In Ravanbakhsh et al., 2017, VAEs are applied to simulate observations of distant galaxies, helping calibrate systems that detect weak gravitational lensing.
“In (Ravanbakhsh et al., 2017), VAEs are applied to simulate observations of distant galaxies.This helps with the calibration of systems that need to indirectly detect the shearing of observations of distant galaxies, caused by weak gravitational lensing in the presence of dark matter between earth and those galaxies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ravanbakhsh et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Relatively simple transformations in observed space, such as linear transformations, often translate into semantically meaningful modifications of the original image.
“Relatively simple transformations in the observed space, such as linear transformations, often translate into semantically meaningful modifications of the original image.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
For learning flexible inference models, the authors proposed inverse autoregressive flows (IAF), a type of normalizing flow that allows scaling to high-dimensional latent spaces.
“For learning flexible inference models, we proposed inverse autoregressive flows (IAF), a type of normalizing flow that allows scaling to high-dimensional latent spaces.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Our main contribution is a framework for efficient and scalable gradient-based variational posterior inference and approximate maximum likelihood learning.
“Our main contribution is a framework for efficient and scalable gradient-based variational posterior inference and approximate maximum likelihood learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
The parameters of the models are jointly optimized by performing stochastic gradient ascent on the ELBO.
“The parameters of the models, including the parameters of the neural networks such as the weights and biases, are jointly optimized by performing stochastic gradient ascent on the socalled evidence lower bound (ELBO).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
VAEs can be used for image resynthesis.
“VAEs can be used for image resynthesis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites White, 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
If qφ(z|x) equals pθ(z|x), the ELBO equals the marginal likelihood.
“if q φ (z|x) equals p θ (z|x), the ELBO equals the marginal likelihood”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
For any choice of qφ(z|x), the M-step optimizes a bound on the marginal likelihood.
“for any choice of q φ (z|x), the M -step optimizes a bound on the marginal likelihood”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The E-step minimizes the KL divergence of qφ(z|x) from the true posterior.
“so the E-step, sensibly, minimizes the KL divergence of q φ (z|x) from the true posterior.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
EM can be explained as coordinate ascent on the ELBO.
“The method can be explained as coordinate ascent on the ELBO (Neal and Hinton, 1998).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Neal and Hinton, 1998
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 39
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 77
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIAF greatly improves the flexibility of posterior distributions and allows for a much better fit between the posteriors and the prior.
“IAF greatly improves the flexibility of the posterior distributions, and allows for a much better fit between the posteriors and the prior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenA more flexible way to parameterize conditional distributions in directed graphical models is with neural networks.
“As we explained above, a more flexible way to parameterize such conditional distributions is with neural networks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenVAEs, like other likelihood-based models, generate more dispersed samples but are better density models in terms of the likelihood criterion.
“VAEs, like other likelihood-based models, generate more dispersed samples, but are better density models in terms of the likelihood criterion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningUnder the i.i.d. assumption, the probability of the datapoints given the parameters factorizes as a product of individual datapoint probabilities.
“Under the i.i.d.assumption, the probability of the datapoints given the parameters factorizes as a product of individual datapoint probabilities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The datapoints in dataset D are independent samples from an unchanging underlying distribution.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationStochastic gradient descent is a more efficient method for optimization than batch gradient descent.
“A more efficient method for optimization is stochastic gradient descent (SGD) (section A.3), which uses randomly drawn minibatches of data M ⊂ D of size N M .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites section A.3
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe VAE recognition model can be arbitrarily complex but is still reasonably fast because it can be done using a single feedforward pass from input to latent variables.
“This recognition model can be arbitrary complex but is still reasonably fast because by construction it can be done using a single feedforward pass from input to latent variables.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIn ordinary variational inference, each data-case has a separate variational distribution, which is inefficient for large data-sets.
“This in contrast to VI where each data-case has a separate variational distribution, which is inefficient for large data-sets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDeep learning has been shown to work well for a large variety of classification and regression problems.
“At the time of writing, deep learning has been shown to work well for a large variety of classification and regression problems, as summarized in (LeCun et al., 2015;Goodfellow et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites LeCun et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Goodfellow et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIf all variables in a directed graphical model are observed in the data, we can compute and differentiate the log-probability of the data under the model, leading to relatively straightforward optimization.
“If all variables in the directed graphical model are observed in the data, then we can compute and differentiate the log-probability of the data under the model, leading to relatively straightforward optimization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe unbiased estimator of the log-probability on a minibatch is differentiable, yielding unbiased stochastic gradients.
“The unbiased estimator log p θ (M) is differentiable, yielding the unbiased stochastic gradients:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationGANs can generate images of high subjective perceptual quality but tend to lack full support over the data.
“while GANs can generate images of high subjective perceptual quality, they tend to lack full support over the data (Grover et al., 2018), as opposed to likelihood-based generative models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grover et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenMaximization of the log-likelihood criterion is equivalent to minimization of a Kullback-Leibler divergence between the data and model distributions.
“As we will explain, maximization of the log-likelihood criterion is equivalent to minimization of a Kullback Leibler divergence between the data and model distributions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe Kullback-Leibler divergence between qφ(z|x) and pθ(z|x) is non-negative and zero if and only if qφ(z|x) equals the true posterior distribution.
“The second term in eq.(2.8) is the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between q φ (z|x) and p θ (z|x), which is non-negative:”
- Also stated in: § 2.2 Evidence Lower Bound (ELBO) · plain
“and zero if, and only if, q φ (z|x) equals the true posterior distribution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 2.2 Evidence Lower Bound (ELBO) · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe inference model in a VAE can be almost any directed graphical model.
“Like a DLVM, the inference model can be (almost) any directed graphical model:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe distribution qφ(z|x) can be parameterized using deep neural networks.
“And also similar to a DLVM, the distribution q φ (z|x) can be parameterized using deep neural networks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenFor continuous latent variables z, the marginal pθ(x) can be seen as an infinite mixture, which is potentially more powerful than discrete mixtures.
“For continuous z, p θ (x) can be seen as an infinite mixture, which are potentially more powerful than discrete mixtures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenTraditional inference methods are relatively expensive, often requiring a per-datapoint optimization loop or yielding bad posterior approximations.
“Traditional inference methods are relatively expensive.Such methods, for example, often require a per-datapoint optimization loop, or yield bad posterior approximations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe KL divergence determines the gap between the ELBO and the marginal likelihood (the tightness of the bound); the better qφ(z|x) approximates the true posterior, the smaller the gap.
“The gap between the ELBO L θ,φ (x) and the marginal likelihood log p θ (x); this is also called the tightness of the bound.The better q φ (z|x) approximates the true (posterior) distribution p θ (z|x), in terms of the KL divergence, the smaller the gap.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenIf the latent variable z is discrete and the conditional pθ(x|z) is Gaussian, then the marginal pθ(x) is a mixture-of-Gaussians distribution.
“If z is discrete and p θ (x|z) is a Gaussian distribution, then p θ (x) is a mixtureof-Gaussians distribution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWith amortized inference we can avoid a per-datapoint optimization loop and leverage the efficiency of stochastic gradient descent.
“With amortized inference we can avoid a per-datapoint optimization loop, and leverage the efficiency of SGD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSince the joint distribution pθ(x,z) is tractable to compute, a tractable marginal likelihood pθ(x) leads to a tractable posterior pθ(z|x), and vice versa; both are intractable in deep latent-variable models.
“Since p θ (x, z) is tractable to compute, a tractable marginal likelihood p θ (x) leads to a tractable posterior p θ (z|x), and vice versa.Both are intractable in DLVMs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMaximization of the ELBO with respect to θ and φ will concurrently approximately maximize the marginal likelihood and minimize the KL divergence of qφ(z|x) from the true posterior.
“By looking at equation 2.11, it can be understood that maximization of the ELBO L θ,φ (x) w.r.t. the parameters θ and φ, will concurrently optimize the two things we care about: 1.It will approximately maximize the marginal likelihood p θ (x).”
- Also stated in: § 2.2.1 Two for One · plain
“2. It will minimize the KL divergence of the approximation q φ (z|x) from the true posterior p θ (z|x), so q φ (z|x) becomes better.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 2.2.1 Two for One · plain
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenThe optimization objective of the variational autoencoder is the evidence lower bound (ELBO).
“The optimization objective of the variational autoencoder, like in other variational methods, is the evidence lower bound, abbreviated as ELBO.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe posterior over the parameters of neural networks, p(θ|D), is generally intractable to compute exactly and requires approximate inference techniques.
“Likewise, the posterior over the parameters of (directed models parameterized with) neural networks, p(θ|D), is generally intractable to compute exactly, and requires approximate inference techniques.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe individual-datapoint ELBO and its gradient are, in general, intractable, but good unbiased estimators exist such that minibatch SGD can still be performed.
“The individual-datapoint ELBO, and its gradient ∇ θ,φ L θ,φ (x) is, in general, intractable.However, good unbiased estimators ∇θ,φ L θ,φ (x) exist, as we will show, such that we can still perform minibatch SGD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenWe can build very flexible transformations g() for which the log-determinant is simple to compute, resulting in highly flexible inference models qφ(z|x).
“As we will show, we can build very flexible transformations g() for which log d φ (x, ) is simple to compute, resulting in highly flexible inference models q φ (z|x).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAt the start of training, the likelihood term log p(x|z) is relatively weak, so an initially attractive state is q(z|x) ≈ p(z), resulting in a stable equilibrium from which it is difficult to escape.
“At the start of training, the likelihood term log p(x|z) is relatively weak, such that an initially attractive state is where q(z|x) ≈ p(z), resulting in a stable equilibrium from which it is difficult to escape.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe ELBO can be viewed as a maximum likelihood objective in an augmented space.
“One additional perspective is that the ELBO can be viewed as a maximum likelihood objective in an augmented space.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenImportance weighted estimates have notoriously bad scaling properties to high-dimensional latent spaces.
“The downside of these approaches for optimizing a tighter bound, is that importance weighted estimates have notoriously bad scaling properties to high-dimensional latent spaces.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIssues with 'blurriness' can be countered by choosing a sufficiently flexible inference model and/or a sufficiently flexible generative model.
“Issues with 'blurriness' can thus can be countered by choosing a sufficiently flexible inference model, and/or a sufficiently flexible generative model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe free bits method is a modification of the ELBO objective that ensures that on average a certain minimum number of bits of information are encoded per latent variable, or per group of latent variables.
“An alternative proposed in (Kingma et al., 2016) is the method of free bits: a modification of the ELBO objective, that ensures that on average, a certain minimum number of bits of information are encoded per latent variable, or per group of latent variables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kingma et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe VAE objective contains a regularization term dictated by the variational bound, lacking the usual nuisance regularization hyper-parameter required to learn useful representations.
“The VAE objective contains a regularization term dictated by the variational bound, lacking the usual nuisance regularization hyper-parameter required to learn useful representations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe linear autoencoder approach is limited to linear-Gaussian models, while the VAE approach applies to a much broader class of continuous latent variable models.
“However, this approach using linear autoencoders is limited to linear-Gaussian models, while our approach applies to a much broader class of continuous latent variable models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIncreasing the flexibility and accuracy of the inference model generally improves the tightness of the variational bound (ELBO), bringing it closer to the true marginal likelihood objective.
“Increasing the flexibility and accuracy of the inference model wel generally improve the tightness of the variational bound (ELBO), bringing it closer the true marginal likelihood objective.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningFor efficient optimization of the ELBO, the inference model must be computationally efficient to compute and differentiate its probability density qφ(z|x) and computationally efficient to sample from.
“Requirements for the inference model, in order to be able to efficiently optimize the ELBO, are that it is (1) computationally efficient to compute and differentiate its probability density q φ (z|x), and (2) computationally efficient to sample from, since both these operations need to be performed for each datapoint in a minibatch at every iteration of optimization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe larger variance of pθ under imperfect fit is due to the direction of the KL divergence; the reverse is not true: the generative model is only slightly penalized when putting probability mass on values of (x,z) with no support under q_D,φ.
“This is due to the direction of the KL divergence; if there are values of (x, z) which are likely under q D,φ but not under p θ , the term E q D,φ (x,z) [log p θ (x, z)] will go to infinity.However, the reverse is not true: the generative model is only slightly penalized when putting probability mass on values of (x, z) with no support under q D,φ .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPlanar and radial flows are effective for problems with a relatively low-dimensional latent space.
“These flows are shown to be effective to problems with a relatively low-dimensional latent space.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rezende and Mohamed, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationInverse autoregressive flow (IAF) is a member of the family of normalizing flows.
“As we explained, inverse autoregressive flow (IAF) is a member of the family of normalizing flows, first discussed in (Rezende and Mohamed, 2015) in the context of stochastic variational inference.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rezende and Mohamed, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIt is not clear how to scale planar and radial flows to much higher-dimensional latent spaces, such as latent spaces of generative models of larger images, and how they can leverage the topology of latent space as IAF can.
“It is not clear, however, how to scale such flows to much higher-dimensional latent spaces, such as latent spaces of generative models of larger images, and how planar and radial flows can leverage the topology of latent space, as is possible with IAF.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenBoth x and z can be composed of multiple variables with some topological ordering.
“Both x and z can be composed of multiple variables with some topological ordering.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningA special case of IAF with one step and a linear autoregressive model is the fully Gaussian posterior, transforming a Gaussian variable with diagonal covariance to a Gaussian distribution with full covariance.
“It is straightforward to see that a special case of IAF with one step, and a linear autoregressive model, is the fully Gaussian posterior discussed earlier.This transforms a Gaussian variable with diagonal covariance, to one with linear dependencies, i.e. a Gaussian distribution with full covariance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe scalar value log pθ(x,z) - log qφ(z|x) is differentiable and optimizable with SGD.
“It is also differentiable and optimizable with SGD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHamiltonian Variational Inference transformations are guided by the exact posterior distribution and leave this distribution invariant for small step sizes.
“This type of transformation has the additional benefit that it is guided by the exact posterior distribution, and that it leaves this distribution invariant for small step sizes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Salimans et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe generative model pθ(x,z) and corresponding inference model qφ(z|x) can be parameterized as any directed graph.
“The generative model p θ (x, z), and corresponding inference model q φ (z|x) can be parameterized as any directed graph.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe best models to date, in terms of attained log-likelihood on test data, employ a combination of latent variables, full autoregression, and invertible transformations with tractable Jacobian determinant.
“The best models to date, in terms of attained log-likelihood on test data, employ a combination of the three approaches listed above.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenIn the case of continuous data, autoregressive models can be interpreted as a special case of learning an invertible transformation with tractable Jacobian determinant from the data to a simpler known distribution.
“In case of continuous data, autoregressive models can be interpreted as a special case of a more general approach: learning an invertible transformation with tractable Jacobian determinant (also called normalizing flow) from the data to a simpler, known distribution such as a Gaussian or Uniform distribution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe length of computation of the log-likelihood of fully autoregressive models does not necessarily scale with the dimensionality of the data.
“The length of computation of the log-likelihood of fully autoregressive models does not necesarilly scale with the dimensionality of the data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationShared ordering allows sharing parameters between inference and generative models, leading to faster learning and better solutions.
“One advantage of shared ordering, as explained in these works, is that this allows us to easily share parameters between the inference and generative models, leading to faster learning and better solutions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Salimans, 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sønderby et al., 2016a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kingma et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningWhen pθ(zi|Pa(zi)) is Gaussian distributed, the inference model can be directly specified as the product of this Gaussian distribution with a learned quadratic pseudo-likelihood term.
“This coupling is especially straightforward when p θ (z i |P a(z i )) is Gaussian distributed.The inference model can be directly specified as the product of this Gaussian distribution, with a learned quadratic pseudo-likelihood term:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA less constraining variant is to let the neural network parameterizing qφ(zi|Pa(zi),x) be partially specified by a part of the neural network parameterizing pθ(zi|Pa(zi)).
“A less constraining variant, explored by (Kingma et al., 2016), is to simply let the neural network that parameterizes q φ (z i |P a(z i ), x) be partially specified by a part of the neural network that parameterizes p θ (z i |P a(z i )).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kingma et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Gómez-Bombarelli et al., 2018, a VAE is trained on hundreds of thousands of existing chemical structures, and the resulting continuous representation is used for gradient-based optimization towards certain properties, demonstrated on the design of drug-like molecules and organic light-emitting diodes.
“One example of a recent scientific application of artificial creativity, is shown in Gómez-Bombarelli et al., 2018.In this paper, a fairly straightforward VAE is trained on hundreds of thousands of existing chemical structures.The resulting continuous representation (latent space) is subsequently used to perform gradient-based optimization towards certain properties; the method is demonstrated on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gómez-Bombarelli et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningWhen no single natural one-dimensional ordering exists, like in two-dimensional images, this leads to a model with a somewhat awkward inductive bias.
“When no single natural one-dimensional ordering exists, like in two-dimensional images, this leads to a model with a somewhat awkward inductive bias.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenA disadvantage of autoregressive models compared to latent-variable models is that ancestral sampling is a sequential operation of O(D) length, proportional to the dimensionality of the data.
“A disadvantage of autoregressive models, compared to latent-variable models, is that ancestral sampling from autoregressive models is a sequential operation computation of O(D) length, i.e. proportional to the dimensionality of the data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAt the time of writing, no such model has yet been demonstrated to lead to similar performance as purely autoregressive or VAE-based models in terms of data log-likelihood.
“At the time of writing, no such model has yet been demonstrated to lead to the similar performance as purely autoregressive or VAE-based models in terms of data log-likelihood, but this remains an active area of research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Bowman et al., 2015, a VAE can be successfully trained on text, and the model successfully interpolates between sentences and imputes missing words.
“A similar approach was used to generating natural-language sentences from a continuous space by Bowman et al., 2015.In this paper, it is shown how a VAE can be successfully trained on text.The model is shown to succesfully interpolate between sentences, and for imputation of missing words.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bowman et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationVAE-based techniques are among state of the art for semi-supervised classification, with on average under 1% classification error on MNIST when trained with only 10 labeled images per class.
“Techniques based on VAEs are now among state of the art for semisupervised classification (Maaløe et al., 2016), with on average under 1% classification error in the MNIST classification problem, when trained with only 10 labeled images per class, i.e. when more than 99.8% of the labels in the training set were removed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Maaløe et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenAutoregressive models require choosing a specific ordering of input elements.
“Autoregressive models also require choosing a specific ordering of input elements (equation (4.8)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationNICE and Real NVP flows have equal computational cost and depth in both directions, making them relatively cheap to optimize and sample from.
“In (Dinh et al., 2014;Dinh et al., 2016), particularly interesting flows (NICE and Real NVP) were introduced, with equal computational cost and depth in both directions, making it both relatively cheap to optimize and to sample from such models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dinh et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dinh et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIf neural networks are used for invertible mappings, this is a powerful and flexible approach towards probabilistic modeling of continuous data and nonlinear independent component analysis.
“If we use neural networks for such invertible mappings, this is a powerful and flexible approach towards probabilistic modeling of continuous data and nonlinear independent component analysis (Deco and Brauer, 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Deco and Brauer, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAt the time of writing, the best systems use a combination of autoregressive models, invertible transformations, and VAEs.
“The techniques of autoregressive models and invertible transformations can be naturally combined with variational autoencoders, and at the time of writing, the best systems use a combination Rezende and Mohamed, 2015;Kingma et al., 2016;Gulrajani et al., 2017.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Rezende and Mohamed, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kingma et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gulrajani et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe constraint that normalizing flows iteratively update a variable of the same dimensionality as the data can make such transformations more challenging to optimize than methods without such constraint.
“This constraint on the dimensionality of intermediate states of the mapping can make such transformations more challenging to optimize than methods without such constraint.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNormalizing flows were proposed as a framework for improving the flexibility of inference models.
“Normalizing flows (Rezende and Mohamed, 2015) were proposed as a framework for improving the flexibility of inference models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rezende and Mohamed, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn Kingma et al., 2016, the first normalizing flow was proposed that scales well to high-dimensional latent spaces.
“In Kingma et al., 2016, the first normalizing flow was proposed that scales well to high-dimensional latent spaces.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kingma et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe ELBO objective can be generalized into an importance-weighted objective, as proposed in Burda et al., 2015.
“The ELBO objective can be generalized into an importance-weighted objective, as proposed in (Burda et al., 2015) (Importance-Weighted Autoencoders).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Burda et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Kingma et al., 2015, a refined method, the local reparameterization trick, further decreases the variance of the gradient estimator and was applied to estimation of Gaussian parameter posteriors.
“In (Kingma et al., 2015) we describe a refined method, the local reparameterization trick, for further decreasing the variance of the gradient estimator, and applied it to estimation of Gaussian parameter posteriors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kingma et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDeep models with multiple stochastic layers can improve the variational bound, as demonstrated in Sønderby et al., 2016a and Sønderby et al., 2016b as Ladder VAEs.
“Similarly, one can use deep models with multiple stochastic layers to improve the variational bound, as demonstrated in (Sønderby et al., 2016a) and (Sønderby et al., 2016b) as Ladder VAEs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Sønderby et al., 2016a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sønderby et al., 2016b
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn Salimans et al., 2015, auxiliary variables were used in a combination of variational inference with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, with momentum variables as auxiliary variables.
“In this paper, the principle was used in a combination of variational inference with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC), with the momentum variables of HMC as auxiliary variables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Salimans et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn addition to Kingma and Welling, 2014, two later papers proposed equivalent algorithms, with Lázaro-Gredilla, 2014 applying the same reparameterization gradient method to estimation of parameter posteriors rather than amortized latent-variable inference.
“In addition to our original publication (Kingma and Welling, 2014), two later papers have proposed equivalent algorithms (Rezende et al., 2014;Lázaro-Gredilla, 2014), where the latter work applies the same reparameterization gradient method to the estimation of parameter posteriors, rather than amortized latent-variable inference.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Rezende et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lázaro-Gredilla, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe intermediate sentences generated by the VAE are grammatically correct, and the topic and syntactic structure are typically locally consistent.
“The intermediate sentences are grammatically correct, and the topic and syntactic structure are typically locally consistent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bowman et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAuxiliary variables can be used to improve posterior flexibility, first proposed in Salimans et al., 2015.
“As an alternative to (or in conjunction with) normalizing flows, one can use auxiliary variables to improve posterior flexibility.This principle was, to the best of our knowledge, first proposed in Salimans et al., 2015.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Salimans et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningImportance-weighted objective potentially reduces variance in gradient but can be difficult to scale to high-dimensional latent spaces.
“This potentially reduces the variance in the gradient, but has not been discussed in-depth here since (as often the case with importance-weighted estimators) it can be difficult to scale to highdimensional latent spaces.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSince VAEs can transform discrete observation spaces to continuous latent-variable spaces with approximately known marginals, they are interesting for use in model-based control.
“Since VAEs can transform discrete observation spaces to continuous latent-variable spaces with approximately known marginals, they are interesting for use in model-based control (Watter et al., 2015;Pritzel et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Watter et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Pritzel et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenSuch models can be made incredibly flexible by parameterizing the conditional distributions with differentiable deep neural networks.
“Such models can be made incredibly flexible by parameterizing the conditional distributions with differentiable deep neural networks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenThe inference model approximates the posterior distribution of the latent variables of the generative model.
“The inference model, also called encoder or recognition model, approximates the posterior distribution of the latent variables of the generative model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenBoth generative and inference models are directed graphical models wholly or partially parameterized by deep neural networks.
“Both the generative model and the inference model are directed graphical models that are wholly or partially parameterized by deep neural networks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenIn VI, inference is cast as an optimization problem over newly introduced variational parameters, typically optimized towards the ELBO, a lower bound on model evidence or marginal likelihood.
“In VI, inference is cast as an optimization problem over newly introduced variational parameters, typically optimized towards the ELBO, a lower bound on the model evidence, or marginal likelihood of the data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe proposed VAE framework remains the only framework in the literature that allows for both discrete and continuous observed variables, allows for efficient amortized latent-variable inference and fast synthesis, and can produce close to state-of-the-art performance in terms of log-likelihood of data.
“The proposed VAE framework remains the only framework in the literature that allows for both discrete and continuous observed variables, allows for efficient amortized latent-variable inference and fast synthesis, and which can produce close to state-of-the-art performance in terms of the log-likelihood of data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenA VAE is a combination of a deep latent-variable model with continuous latent variables and an associated inference model.
“A VAE is a combination of a deep latent-variable model (DLVM) with continuous latent variables, and an associated inference model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenStochastic gradients necessary for SGD are obtained through a basic reparameterization trick.
“Stochastic gradients, necessary for performing SGD, are obtained through a basic reparameterization trick.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe VAE framework is now a commonly used tool for various applications of probabilistic modeling and artificial creativity, and basic implementations are available in most major deep learning software libraries.
“The VAE framework is now a commonly used tool for various applications of probabilistic modeling and artificial creativity, and basic implementations are available in most major deep learning software libraries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe ELBO is a lower bound on the marginal likelihood of the data.
“The ELBO is a lower bound on the marginal likelihood of the data, also called the variational lower bound.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn Heess et al., 2015, re-parameterization of observed variables together with an observation model can be used to compute novel forms of policy gradients.
“In (Heess et al., 2015) (Stochastic Value Gradients) it was shown that the re-parameterization of the observed variables, together with an observation model, can be used to compute novel forms of policy gradients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Heess et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningIn latent-variable or Bayesian models with random parameters, one needs approximate posterior estimation for which variational inference methods are suitable.
“However, one is often more interested in flexible models with latent variables, such as deep latent-variable models, or Bayesian models with random parameters.In both cases one needs to perform approximate posterior estimation for which variational inference (VI) methods are suitable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenOptimization of such models towards the maximum likelihood objective is straightforward in the fully-observed case.
“Optimization of such models towards the maximum likelihood objective is straightforward in the fully-observed case.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Higgins et al., 2017, strengthening the contribution of DKL(qφ(z|x)||pθ(z)) restricts information flow through latent space and was shown to improve disentanglement of latent factors.
“In (Higgins et al., 2017) (β-VAE) it was proposed to strengthen the contribution of D KL (q φ (z|x)||p θ (z)), thus restricting the information flow through the latent space, which was shown to improve disentanglement of latent factors, further studied in (Chen et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Higgins et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Chen et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenAnother Bayesian approach towards optimizing the likelihood pθ(x) with DLVMs is EM with MCMC.
“Another Bayesian approach towards optimizing the likelihood p θ (x) with DLVMs is Expectation Maximization (EM) with Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAdam and Adamax optimization methods are invariant to constant rescaling of the objective and to constant re-scalings of individual gradients.
“Adam and Adamax optimization methods for choosing α t (Kingma and Ba, 2015); these methods are invariant to constant rescaling of the objective, and invariant to constant re-scalings of the individual gradients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kingma and Ba, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAs a result, L(θ, ξ) only needs to be unbiased up to proportionality.
“As a result, L(θ, ξ) only needs to be unbiased up to proportionality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningA principal application of Bayes' rule is that it allows us to make predictions about future data x, that are optimal as long as the prior p(θ) and model class pθ(x) are correct.
“A principal application of Bayes' rule is that it allows us to make predictions about future data x , that are optimal as long as the prior p(θ) and model class p θ (x) are correct:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOne version of MCMC which uses such posterior for relatively fast convergence is Hamiltonian MCMC.
“One version of MCMC which uses such posterior for relatively fast convergence, is Hamiltonian MCMC (Neal, 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Neal, 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningFrom a Bayesian perspective, we can improve upon the maximum likelihood objective through maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation, which maximizes the log-posterior w.r.t.θ.
“From a Bayesian perspective, we can improve upon the maximum likelihood objective through maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation, which maximizes the log-posterior w.r.t.θ.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationExpectation Maximization (EM) is a general strategy for learning parameters in partially observed models.
“Expectation Maximization (EM) is a general strategy for learning parameters in partially observed models (Dempster et al., 1977).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dempster et al., 1977
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenA disadvantage of MCMC is the requirement for running an independent MCMC chain per datapoint.
“A disadvantage of this approach is the requirement for running an independent MCMC chain per datapoint.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe tightness of this bound is defined by DKL(qφ(z|x)||pθ(z|x)).
“The tightness of this bound is defined by D KL (q φ (z|x)||p θ (z|x)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenSharing directionality of inference (top-down) allows straightforward sharing of parameters between the generative model and the inference model.
“Sharing directionality of inference, as in (b), has the benefit that it allows for straightforward sharing of parameters between the generative model and the inference model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDue to the remarkable efficiency of reverse-mode automatic differentiation, the value and gradient of differentiable scalar objectives can be computed with equal time complexity.
“Due to the remarkable efficiency of reverse-mode automatic differentiation (also known as the backpropagation algorithm (Rumelhart et al., 1988)), the value and gradient (i.e. the vector of partial derivatives) of differentiable scalar objectives can be computed with equal time complexity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rumelhart et al., 1988
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningPosterior gradients in DLVMs are relatively affordable to compute by differentiating the log-joint distribution w.r.t.z.
“Note that posterior gradients in DLVMs are relatively affordable to compute by differentiating the log-joint distribution w.r.t.z:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningWe work with directed models where the objective per datapoint is scalar, and due to the differentiability of neural networks that compose them, the objective is differentiable w.r.t. its parameters θ.
“We work with directed models where the objective per datapoint is scalar, and due to the differentiability of neural networks that compose them, the objective is differentiable w.r.t.its parameters θ.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenEarly stopping criterion is to stop optimization as soon as the probability of a holdout set of data starts decreasing.
“A simple but effective criterion is to stop optimization as soon as the probability of a holdout set of data starts decreasing; this criterion is called early stopping.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenOptimization of the generative model changes both pθ(zi|Pa(zi)) and pθ(x|zi, Pa(zi)).
“Optimization of the generative model changes both p θ (z i |P a(z i )) and p θ (x|z i , P a(z i )).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe prior p(θ) in equation (A.5) has diminishing effect for increasingly large N.
“The prior p(θ) in equation (A.5) has diminishing effect for increasingly large N .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenVAEs employ a strategy with global variational parameters.
“In contrast, VAEs employ a strategy with global variational parameters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIn case of MCMC, the posterior is approximated by a mixture of a set of approximately i.i.d. samples from the posterior, acquired by running a Markov chain.
“In case of MCMC, the posterior is approximated by a mixture of a set of approximately i.i.d.samples from the posterior, acquired by running a Markov chain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
The observed variable x is a random sample from an unknown underlying process, whose true distribution p*(x) is unknown.
“We assume the observed variable x is a random sample from an unknown underlying process, whose true (probability) distribution p * (x) is unknown.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The datapoints in dataset D are independent samples from an unchanging underlying distribution.
“The datapoints are assumed to be independent samples from an unchanging underlying distribution.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The distribution of the noise random variable ε is independent of x or φ.
“where the distribution of random variable is independent of x or φ.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The transformation g(.) is invertible.
“As long as g(.) is an invertible function, the densities of and z are related as:”
The paper relies on this without support.
Latent variable models with multiple layers of stochastic variables are often equivalent to auxiliary-variable methods.
“Latent variable models with multiple layers of stochastic variables, such as the one used in our experiments, are often equivalent to such auxiliary-variable methods.”
The paper relies on this without support.
When the number of labeled examples is low, purely supervised approaches tend to exhibit poor generalization to new data.
“When the number of labeled examples is low, solutions found with purely supervised approaches tend to exhibit poor generalization to new data.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Existing methods for posterior inference were either relatively inefficient or not applicable to models with neural networks as components.
“Existing methods for such posterior inference were either relatively inefficient, or not applicable to models with neural networks as components.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In case of i.i.d. data, traditional variational EM methods estimate local variational parameters φ(i), i.e. a separate set of variational parameters per datapoint i in the dataset.
“In case of of i.i.d.data, traditional variational EM methods estimate local variational parameters φ (i) , i.e. a separate set of variational parameters per datapoint i in the dataset.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
VAEs are inherently probabilistic, making them well-suited for tasks that require uncertainty quantification.
“VAEs are inherently probabilistic, making them well-suited for tasks that require uncertainty quantification.”
From A machine learning model that outperforms conventional global subseasonal forecast models (2024) · cites this paper as [88]
There is a lack of critical perspectives within the theoretical framework investigating the speculative relation between human creatives, generative AI agents, and other potential social stakeholders.
“Thus, going beyond commercial application, there's still a lack of critical perspectives within the theoretical framework which investigate the speculative relation between human creatives, generative AI agents, and other potential social stakeholders [39,76].”
From Exploring Designers’ Perceptions and Practices of Collaborating with Generative AI as a Co-creative Agent in a Multi-stakeholder Design Process: Take the Domain of Avatar Design as an Example (2023) · cites this paper as [39]
Section 4.5.2 discusses artificial creativity as an application of generative models, but does not assess critical perspectives on relationships among human creatives, AI agents, and social stakeholders. Searches for those relationships and for the claimed theoretical gap found no passage addressing them. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredVariational Autoencoders aim to learn both an encoder and a decoder to map input data to values in a continuous latent space.
“Variational Autoencoders [61,123,194] aim to learn both an encoder and a decoder to map input data to values in a continuous latent space.”
From Diffusion Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Methods and Applications (2024) · cites this paper as [123]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Dataset log-likelihood is both a sum and an average
MinorEquation (1.10) defines log p θ (D) as the sum of datapoint log-probabilities. Equation (2.58) uses the same quantity for the average, differing by a factor of the dataset size.
“log p θ (D) = 1 N D x∈D log p θ (x) (2.58)”
“log p θ (D) = x∈D log p θ (x) (1.10)”
Auxiliary-variable ELBO has the wrong KL sign
MinorEquation (3.4) equates the expected ELBO to a KL divergence in (3.5). The paper's earlier joint-distribution identity instead makes a KL divergence equal to the negative ELBO plus a constant.
“E q D (x) E q φ (u,z|x) [log p θ (x, z, u) -log q φ (u, z|x)] (3.4) = D KL (q D,φ (x, z, u)||p θ (x, z, u) (3.5)”
“D KL (q D,φ (x, z)||p θ (x, z)) (2.63) = -E q D (x) E q φ (z|x) [log p θ (x, z) -log q φ (z|x)] -log q D (x) (2.64) = -L θ,φ (D) + constant (2.65)”
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318 · see citing works
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · see citing works
Self-citationLeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126 · see citing works
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805 · see citing works
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the <i>EM</i> Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444 · see citing works
Going deeper with convolutions
Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298594 · Cited by 48,562 · see citing works
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380 · see citing works
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892 · see citing works
Labaca-Castro, R. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-40442-0_9 · Cited by 21,100 · see citing works
Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes
Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6114 · Cited by 20,067 · see citing works
Self-citationDelving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.123 · Cited by 19,741 · see citing works
GAN(Generative Adversarial Nets)
淳司, 柴. (2017) · Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics · doi:10.3156/jsoft.29.5_177_2 · Cited by 19,268 · see citing works
Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives
Bengio, Y., Courville, A., & Vincent, P. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2013.50 · Cited by 13,001 · see citing works
(2016) · Cited by 11,679 · see citing works
Simple Statistical Gradient-Following Algorithms for Connectionist Reinforcement Learning
Williams, R. J. (1992) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00992696 · Cited by 7,936 · see citing works
(2009) · Cited by 6,153 · see citing works
Variational Inference with Normalizing FlowsPreprint
Rezende, D. J., & Mohamed, S. (2015) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1505.05770 · Cited by 5,748 · see citing works
(2010) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/1756006.1953039 · Cited by 4,051 · see citing works
Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering
Glasserman, P. (2003) · Applications of mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21617-1 · Cited by 3,944 · see citing works
Stochastic Backpropagation and Approximate Inference in Deep Generative ModelsPreprint
Rezende, D. J., Mohamed, S., & Wierstra, D. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1401.4082 · Cited by 3,679 · see citing works
Variational Graph Auto-EncodersPreprint
Kipf, T., & Welling, M. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.07308 · Cited by 3,635 · see citing works
Self-citationCategorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmax
Jang, E., Gu, S., & Poole, B. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.01144 · Cited by 3,616 · see citing works
(2017) · International Conference on Learning Representations · Cited by 3,248 · see citing works
Pixel Recurrent Neural NetworksPreprint
van den Oord, A., Kalchbrenner, N., & Kavukcuoglu, K. (2016) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1601.06759 · Cited by 3,111 · see citing works
Conditional Image Generation with PixelCNN DecodersPreprint
van den Oord, A., Kalchbrenner, N., Vinyals, O., Espeholt, L., Graves, A., & Kavukcuoglu, K. (2016) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.05328 · Cited by 3,066 · see citing works
Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics
Sohl-Dickstein, J., Weiss, E. A., Maheswaranathan, N., & Ganguli, S. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.03585 · Cited by 2,637 · see citing works
MCMC Using Hamiltonian Dynamics
Neal, R. M. (2011) · Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo · doi:10.1201/b10905-6 · Cited by 2,574 · see citing works
A View of the Em Algorithm that Justifies Incremental, Sparse, and other Variants
Neal, R. M., & Hinton, G. E. (1998) · Learning in Graphical Models · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-5014-9_12 · Cited by 2,187 · see citing works
Density estimation using Real NVP
Dinh, L., Sohl-Dickstein, J., & Bengio, S. (2016) · arXiv · Cited by 2,067 · see citing works
Generating Sentences from a Continuous Space
Bowman, S. R., Vilnis, L., Vinyals, O., Dai, A., Jozefowicz, R., & Bengio, S. (2016) · Proceedings of The 20th SIGNLL Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/k16-1002 · Cited by 2,061 · see citing works
Graphical Models, Exponential Families, and Variational Inference
Wainwright, M. J., & Jordan, M. I. (2008) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000001 · Cited by 1,822 · see citing works
Automatic Chemical Design Using a Data-Driven Continuous Representation of Molecules.
Gómez‐Bombarelli, R., Wei, J. N., Duvenaud, D., Hernández-Lobato, J. M., Sánchez-Lengeling, B., Sheberla, D., Aguilera‐Iparraguirre, J., Hirzel, T. D., Adams, R. P., & Aspuru‐Guzik, A. (2018) · Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database · doi:10.17863/cam.34134 · Cited by 1,813 · see citing works
Stochastic variational inference
Hoffman, M. D., Blei, D. M., Wang, C., & Paisley, J. W. (2013) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/2567709.2502622 · Cited by 1,802 · see citing works
The Concrete Distribution: A Continuous Relaxation of Discrete Random VariablesPreprint
Maddison, C. J., Mnih, A., & Teh, Y. W. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.00712 · Cited by 1,771 · see citing works
Semi-Supervised Learning with Deep Generative Models
Kingma, D. P., Rezende, D. J., Mohamed, S., & Welling, M. (2014) · UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1406.5298 · Cited by 1,646 · see citing works
Self-citationIdentifying Resilient Communities in Road Networks: A Path-Based Embedding Approach
Wagner, C., Dodge, S., & Alizadeh, D. (2025) · Leibniz international proceedings in informatics · doi:10.4230/lipics.giscience.2025.9 · Cited by 1,599 · see citing works
Makhzani, A., Shlens, J., Jaitly, N., Goodfellow, I., & Frey, B. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.05644 · Cited by 1,579 · see citing works
NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimation
Dinh, L., Krueger, D., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1410.8516 · Cited by 1,493 · see citing works
An Empirical Exploration of Recurrent Network Architectures
Józefowicz, R., Zaremba, W., & Sutskever, I. (2015) · Cited by 1,459 · see citing works
Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networks
Blundell, C., Cornebise, J., Kavukcuoglu, K., & Wierstra, D. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1505.05424 · Cited by 1,342 · see citing works
Auto-association by multilayer perceptrons and singular value decomposition
Bourlard, H., & Kamp, Y. (1988) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00332918 · Cited by 1,332 · see citing works
Autoencoding beyond pixels using a learned similarity metric
Larsen, A., Sønderby, S. K., Larochelle, H., & Winther, O. (2016) · Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) · Cited by 1,317 · see citing works
Weight Uncertainty in Neural Network
Blundell, C., Cornebise, J., Kavukcuoglu, K., & Wierstra, D. (2015) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 1,280 · see citing works
Dayan, P., Hinton, G. E., Neal, R. M., & Zemel, R. S. (1995) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1995.7.5.889 · Cited by 1,207 · see citing works
Huber, M. (2011) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/b10905-10 · Cited by 1,177 · see citing works
Improving Variational Inference with Inverse Autoregressive FlowPreprint
Kingma, D., Salimans, T., Józefowicz, R., Chen, X., Sutskever, I., & Welling, M. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.04934 · Cited by 1,112 · see citing works
Self-citationPractical Variational Inference for Neural Networks
Graves, A. (2011) · Cited by 1,079 · see citing works
The "Wake-Sleep" Algorithm for Unsupervised Neural Networks
Hinton, G. E., Dayan, P., Frey, B. J., & Neal, R. M. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7761831 · Cited by 1,070 · see citing works
A theoretically grounded application of dropout in recurrent neural networks
Gal, Y., & Zoubin Ghahramani, A. (2016) · Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database · Cited by 1,051 · see citing works
Adversarially Learned InferencePreprint
Dumoulin, V., Belghazi, M. I., Poole, B., Mastropietro, O., Lamb, A., Arjovsky, M., & Courville, A. C. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.00704 · Cited by 1,015 · see citing works
Simple Statistical Gradient-Following Algorithms for Connectionist Reinforcement Learning
Williams, R. J. (1992) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-3618-5_2 · Cited by 941 · see citing works
Stochastic Variational InferencePreprint
Hoffman, M., Blei, D. M., Wang, C., & Paisley, J. W. (2012) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1206.7051 · Cited by 850 · see citing works
Simple statistical gradient-following algorithms for connectionist reinforcement learning
Williams, R. J. (1992) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1022672621406 · Cited by 817 · see citing works
A Recurrent Latent Variable Model for Sequential DataPreprint
Chung, J., Kastner, K., Dinh, L., Goel, K., Courville, A. C., & Bengio, Y. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.02216 · Cited by 799 · see citing works
Learning Representations by Back-Propagating Errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (2002) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1888.003.0013 · Cited by 794 · see citing works
DRAW: A Recurrent Neural Network For Image Generation
Gregor, K., Danihelka, I., Graves, A., Rezende, D. J., & Wierstra, D. (2015) · Cited by 785 · see citing works
EM Algorithms for PCA and SPCA
Roweis, S. T. (1997) · Cited by 780 · see citing works
A Theoretically Grounded Application of Dropout in Recurrent Neural NetworksPreprint
Gal, Y., & Zoubin Ghahramani, A. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1512.05287 · Cited by 765 · see citing works
Isolating Sources of Disentanglement in Variational AutoencodersPreprint
Chen, R. T. Q., Li, X., Grosse, R., & Duvenaud, D. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.04942 · Cited by 765 · see citing works
Zhao, T., Zhao, R., & Eskenazi, M. (2017) · Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-1061 · Cited by 736 · see citing works
A Hierarchical Latent Variable Encoder-Decoder Model for Generating Dialogues
Serban, I. V., Sordoni, A., Lowe, R., Charlin, L., Pineau, J., Courville, A. C., & Bengio, Y. (2017) · AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) · doi:10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10983 · Cited by 734 · see citing works
Variational Lossy AutoencoderPreprint
Chen, X., Kingma, D. P., Salimans, T., Duan, Y., Dhariwal, P., Schulman, J. D., Sutskever, I., & Abbeel, P. (2016) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.02731 · Cited by 724 · see citing works
Self-citationDeep Convolutional Inverse Graphics NetworkPreprint
Kulkarni, T. D., Whitney, W., Kohli, P., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.03167 · Cited by 708 · see citing works
Variational Dropout and the Local Reparameterization TrickPreprint
Kingma, D. P., Salimans, T., & Welling, M. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.02557 · Cited by 708 · see citing works
Self-citationAttribute2Image: Conditional Image Generation from Visual Attributes
Yan, X., Yang, J., Sohn, K., & Lee, H. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46493-0_47 · Cited by 688 · see citing works
Variational Autoencoder for Deep Learning of Images, Labels and CaptionsPreprint
Pu, Y., Gan, Z., Henao, R., Yuan, X., Li, C., Stevens, A., & Carin, L. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.08976 · Cited by 662 · see citing works
Black Box Variational InferencePreprint
Ranganath, R., Gerrish, S., & Blei, D. M. (2013) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1401.0118 · Cited by 646 · see citing works
Importance Weighted Autoencoders
Burda, Y., Grosse, R., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1509.00519 · Cited by 644 · see citing works
Learning to generate chairs with convolutional neural networks
Dosovitskiy, A., Springenberg, J. T., & Brox, T. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298761 · Cited by 640 · see citing works
Generative Moment Matching NetworksPreprint
Li, Y., Swersky, K., & Zemel, R. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.02761 · Cited by 618 · see citing works
Variational Dropout Sparsifies Deep Neural NetworksPreprint
Molchanov, D., Ashukha, A., & Vetrov, D. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1701.05369 · Cited by 612 · see citing works
Automatic differentiation variational inference
Kucukelbir, A., Tran, D., Ranganath, R., Gelman, A., & Blei, D. M. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.00788 · Cited by 515 · see citing works
MADE: Masked Autoencoder for Distribution EstimationPreprint
Germain, M., Gregor, K., Murray, I., & Larochelle, H. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03509 · Cited by 512 · see citing works
Variational Information Maximisation for Intrinsically Motivated Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Mohamed, S., & Rezende, D. J. (2015) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1509.08731 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Towards a Neural StatisticianPreprint
Edwards, H., & Storkey, A. (2016) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.02185 · Cited by 450 · see citing works
Improved Variational Autoencoders for Text Modeling using Dilated ConvolutionsPreprint
Yang, Z., Hu, Z., Salakhutdinov, R., & Berg-Kirkpatrick, T. (2017) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1702.08139 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
Likelihood ratio gradient estimation for stochastic systems
Glynn, P. W. (1990) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/84537.84552 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
Bayesian Compression for Deep LearningPreprint
Louizos, C., Ullrich, K., & Welling, M. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.08665 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Self-citationMarkov Chain Monte Carlo and Variational Inference: Bridging the Gap
Salimans, T., Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2014) · UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1410.6460 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Self-citationLearning Continuous Control Policies by Stochastic Value GradientsPreprint
Heess, N., Wayne, G., Silver, D., Lillicrap, T., Tassa, Y., & Erez, T. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1510.09142 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Structured Inference Networks for Nonlinear State Space Models
Krishnan, R. G., Shalit, U., & Sontag, D. A. (2017) · AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) · doi:10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10779 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
Efficient Learning of Deep Boltzmann Machines
Salakhutdinov, R., & Larochelle, H. (2010) · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Generating Images from Captions with AttentionPreprint
Mansimov, E., Parisotto, E., Ba, J. L., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.02793 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Hsu, C.-C., Hwang, H.-T., Wu, Y.-C., Tsao, Y., & Wang, H. (2017) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2017-63 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
The Variational Fair Autoencoder
Louizos, C., Swersky, K., Li, Y., Welling, M., & Zemel, R. S. (2016) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Self-citationDeep Generative Stochastic Networks Trainable by BackpropPreprint
Bengio, Y., Thibodeau-Laufer, É., Alain, G., & Yosinski, J. (2013) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1306.1091 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Ladder Variational AutoencodersPreprint
Sønderby, C. K., Raiko, T., Maaløe, L., Sønderby, S. K., & Winther, O. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.02282 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Embed to Control: A Locally Linear Latent Dynamics Model for Control from Raw ImagesPreprint
Watter, M., Springenberg, J. T., Boedecker, J., & Riedmiller, M. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.07365 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Voice conversion from non-parallel corpora using variational auto-encoder
Hsu, C.-C., Hwang, H.-T., Wu, Y.-C., Tsao, Y., & Wang, H. (2016) · Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC) · doi:10.1109/apsipa.2016.7820786 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Variational Bayesian Inference with Stochastic SearchPreprint
Paisley, J. W., Blei, D. M., & Jordan, M. I. (2012) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1206.6430 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Auxiliary Deep Generative ModelsPreprint
Maaløe, L., Sønderby, C. K., Sønderby, S. K., & Winther, O. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.05473 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Neural Photo Editing with Introspective Adversarial Networks
Brock, A., Lim, T., Ritchie, J. M., & Weston, N. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.07093 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
A Hybrid Convolutional Variational Autoencoder for Text Generation
Semeniuta, S., Severyn, A., & Barth, E. (2017) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1066 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Attend, Infer, Repeat: Fast Scene Understanding with Generative ModelsPreprint
Eslami, S. M. A., Heess, N., Weber, T., Tassa, Y., Szepesvári, D., Kavukcuoglu, K., & Hinton, G. E. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.08575 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Multiplicative Normalizing Flows for Variational Bayesian Neural NetworksPreprint
Louizos, C., & Welling, M. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.01961 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Self-citationNeural Autoregressive FlowsPreprint
Huang, C.-W., Krueger, D., Lacoste, A., & Courville, A. C. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1804.00779 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Neural Episodic ControlPreprint
Pritzel, A., Uría, B., Srinivasan, S., Puigdomènech, A., Vinyals, O., Hassabis, D., Wierstra, D., & Blundell, C. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.01988 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Deep Variational Bayes Filters: Unsupervised Learning of State Space Models from Raw Data
Karl, M., Soelch, M., Bayer, J., & van der Smagt, P. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.06432 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Composing graphical models with neural networks for structured representations and fast inferencePreprint
Johnson, M. J., Duvenaud, D., Wiltschko, A. B., Datta, S. R., & Adams, R. P. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.06277 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Neural Variational Inference for Text ProcessingPreprint
Miao, Y., Yu, L., & Blunsom, P. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.06038 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Amortized Inference in Probabilistic Reasoning
Gershman, S. J., & Goodman, N. D. (2014) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Learning Diverse Image Colorization
Deshpande, A., Lu, J., Yeh, M.-C., Chong, M. J., & Forsyth, D. A. (2017) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.307 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Doubly Stochastic Variational Bayes for non-Conjugate Inference
Titsias, M. K., & Lázaro-Gredilla, M. (2014) · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Flow-GAN: Combining Maximum Likelihood and Adversarial Learning in Generative Models
Grover, A., Dhar, M., & Ermon, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11829 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Fast Inference in Sparse Coding Algorithms with Applications to Object RecognitionPreprint
Kavukcuoglu, K., Ranzato, M., & LeCun, Y. (2010) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1010.3467 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Sequential Neural Models with Stochastic LayersPreprint
Fraccaro, M., Sønderby, S. K., Paquet, U., & Winther, O. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.07571 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Learning Stochastic Recurrent NetworksPreprint
Bayer, J., & Osendorfer, C. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1411.7610 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Neural Photo Editing With Introspective Adversarial Networks
Brock, A., Lim, T., Ritchie, J. M., & Weston, N. (2017) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.807637 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Unsupervised Learning of 3D Structure from ImagesPreprint
Rezende, D. J., Eslami, S. M. A., Mohamed, S., Battaglia, P., Jaderberg, M., & Heess, N. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.00662 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Neural Variational Inference and Learning in Belief NetworksPreprint
Mnih, A., & Gregor, K. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1402.0030 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Variational Autoencoder for Semi-Supervised Text Classification
Xu, W., Sun, H., Deng, C., & Tan, Y. (2017) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10966 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Towards Conceptual Compression
(2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 185 · see citing works
The Variational Fair AutoencoderPreprint
Louizos, C., Swersky, K., Li, Y., Welling, M., & Zemel, R. S. (2015) · UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.00830 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Self-citationFixed-Form Variational Posterior Approximation through Stochastic Linear Regression
Salimans, T., & Knowles, D. A. (2013) · Bayesian Analysis · doi:10.1214/13-ba858 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Deep AutoRegressive NetworksPreprint
Gregor, K., Danihelka, I., Mnih, A., Blundell, C., & Wierstra, D. (2013) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.8499 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Composing graphical models with neural networks for structured representations and fast inference
Johnson, M., Duvenaud, D., Wiltschko, A. B., Adams, R. P., & Datta, S. R. (2016) · neural information processing systems · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Hsu, C.-C., Hwang, H.-T., Wu, Y.-C., et al. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.00849 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
An Application of the Principle of Maximum Information Preservation to Linear Systems
Linsker, R. (1988) · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Bayesian Recurrent Neural Networks
Fortunato, M., Blundell, C., & Vinyals, O. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.02798 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Variational inference for Monte Carlo objectivesPreprint
Mnih, A., & Rezende, D. J. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.06725 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
PixelVAE: A Latent Variable Model for Natural ImagesPreprint
Gulrajani, I., Kumar, K., Ahmed, F., Taïga, A. A., Visin, F., Vázquez, D., & Courville, A. C. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.05013 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Structured and Efficient Variational Deep Learning with Matrix Gaussian Posteriors
Louizos, C., & Welling, M. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.04733 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Self-citationSequential Neural Models with Stochastic Layers
Fraccaro, M., Sønderby, S. K., Paquet, U., & Winther, O. (2016) · Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Chapter 19 Gradient Estimation
Fu, M. C. (2006) · Handbooks in operations research and management science · doi:10.1016/s0927-0507(06)13019-4 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Towards Conceptual CompressionPreprint
Gregor, K., Besse, F., Rezende, D. J., Danihelka, I., & Wierstra, D. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1604.08772 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Deep Probabilistic ProgrammingPreprint
Tran, D., Hoffman, M. D., Saurous, R. A., Brevdo, E., Murphy, K., & Blei, D. M. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1701.03757 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
The Generalized Reparameterization GradientPreprint
Ruiz, F. J. R., Titsias, M. K., & Blei, D. M. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.02287 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
One-Shot Generalization in Deep Generative ModelsPreprint
Rezende, D. J., Mohamed, S., Danihelka, I., Gregor, K., & Wierstra, D. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.05106 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Sylvester Normalizing Flows for Variational Inference
van den Berg, R., Hasenclever, L., Tomczak, J. M., & Welling, M. (2018) · UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.05649 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citationDistribution Matching in Variational InferencePreprint
Rosca, M., Lakshminarayanan, B., & Mohamed, S. (2018) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.06847 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Rényi divergence variational inference
Li, Y., & Turner, R. E. (2016) · Apollo (University of Cambridge) · doi:10.17863/cam.21344 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Sticking the Landing: Simple, Lower-Variance Gradient Estimators for Variational Inference
Roeder, G., Wu, Y., & Duvenaud, D. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.09194 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Curiosity-driven Exploration in Deep Reinforcement Learning via Bayesian Neural NetworksPreprint
Houthooft, R., Chen, X., Duan, Y., Schulman, J. D., de Turck, F., & Abbeel, P. (2016) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.09674 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Hierarchical Variational ModelsPreprint
Ranganath, R., Tran, D., & Blei, D. M. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.02386 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Improving Variational Auto-Encoders using Householder FlowPreprint
Tomczak, J. M., & Welling, M. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.09630 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citationMuProp: Unbiased Backpropagation for Stochastic Neural NetworksPreprint
Gu, S., Levine, S., Sutskever, I., & Mnih, A. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.05176 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Controllable Text Generation.Preprint
Hu, Z., Yang, Z., Liang, X., Salakhutdinov, R., & Xing, E. P. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Optimization and sensitivity analysis of computer simulation models by the score function method
Kleijnen, J. P. C., & Rubinstein, R. Y. (1996) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(95)00107-7 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Automated Variational Inference in Probabilistic ProgrammingPreprint
Wingate, D., & Weber, T. (2013) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.1299 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
How to Train Deep Variational Autoencoders and Probabilistic Ladder NetworksPreprint
Sønderby, C. K., Raiko, T., Maaløe, L., Sønderby, S. K., & Winther, O. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Enabling Dark Energy Science with Deep Generative Models of Galaxy Images
Ravanbakhsh, S., Lanusse, F., Mandelbaum, R., Schneider, J., & Póczos, B. (2016) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10755 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Semantic Facial Expression Editing using Autoencoded FlowPreprint
Yeh, R. A., Liu, Z., Goldman, D. B., & Agarwala, A. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.09961 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics
Sohl‐Dickstein, J. (2024) · doi:10.57702/qrfwyszh · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Reinterpreting Importance-Weighted AutoencodersPreprint
Cremer, C., Morris, Q., & Duvenaud, D. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.02916 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
A Hybrid Convolutional Variational Autoencoder for Text GenerationPreprint
Semeniuta, S., Severyn, A., & Barth, E. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1702.02390 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Reparameterization Gradients through Acceptance-Rejection Sampling AlgorithmsPreprint
Naesseth, C. A., Ruiz, F. J. R., Linderman, S. W., & Blei, D. M. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.05683 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Sampling Generative Networks: Notes on a Few Effective Techniques.Preprint
White, T. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 37 · see citing works
An Analysis of Logistic Models: Exponential Family Connections and Online Performance
Banerjee, A. (2007) · SIAM International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1137/1.9781611972771.19 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Learning Stochastic Recurrent Networks
Bayer, J., & Osendorfer, C. (2014) · mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Fast Second-Order Stochastic Backpropagation for Variational InferencePreprint
Fan, K., Wang, Z., Beck, J. M., Kwok, J. T.-Y., & Heller, K. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1509.02866 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Flow-GAN: Bridging implicit and prescribed learning in generative modelsPreprint
Grover, A., Dhar, M., & Ermon, S. (2017) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.08868 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Higher Order Statistical Decorrelation without Information Loss
Deco, G., & Brauer, W. (1994) · neural information processing systems · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Bidirectional Helmholtz MachinesPreprint
Bornschein, J., Shabanian, S., Fischer, A., & Bengio, Y. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.03877 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Improving Variational Auto-Encoders using convex combination linear Inverse Autoregressive FlowPreprint
Tomczak, J. M., & Welling, M. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.02326 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Variational Gaussian ProcessPreprint
Tran, D., Ranganath, R., & Blei, D. M. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.06499 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
A Structured Variational Auto-encoder for Learning Deep Hierarchies of Sparse FeaturesPreprint
Salimans, T. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.08734 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
14 of the 171 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 102
- Banerjee, 2007, :mProceedings of the 2007 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, 204
- Bayer, 2014, :mNIPS 2014 Workshop on Advances in Variational Inference
- Bengio, 2014, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 226
- Berg, 2017, :mConference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intel ligence
- Blei, 2012, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 1367
- Blundell, 2015, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 1613
- Bornschein, 2016, :mProceedings of the 33rd International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning, 2511
- Bowman, 2015, :marXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06349 · arXiv
- Brock, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Learning Representations
- Chen, 2018, :mProceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2615
- Chen, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Learning Representations
- Chung, 2015, :mAdvances in neural information processing systems, 2980
- Cremer, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Learning Representations
- Deco, 1995, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 247
- Dempster, 1977, :mJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 1
- Deshpande, 2017, :mProceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 6837
- Dinh, 2016, :marXiv preprint arXiv:1605.08803 · arXiv
- Dosovitskiy, 2015, :mProceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1538
- Dumoulin, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Learning Representations
- Edwards, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Learning Representations
- Eslami, 2016, :mAdvances In Neural Information Processing Systems, 3225
- Fan, 2015, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 1387
- Fraccaro, 2016, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2199
- Gal, 2016, :mAdvances in neural information processing systems, 1019
- Germain, 2015, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 881
- Gershman, 2014, :mCogSci
- Gomez-Bombarelli, 2018, :mACS central science, 268
- Goodfellow, 2014, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2672
- Graves, 2011, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2348
- Gregor, 2016, :mAdvances In Neural Information Processing Systems, 3549
- Gregor, 2015, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 1462
- Gregor, 2014, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 1242
- Grover, 2018, :mAAAI Conference on Artificial Intel ligence
- Gulrajani, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Learning Representations
- He, 2015, :mProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 1026
- He, 2016, :mProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 770
- Heess, 2015, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2944
- Hernandez-Lobato, 2016, “Black-box:madivergence minimization”
- Higgins, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Learning Representations
- Hinton, 1995, :mScience, 1158
- Hoffman, 2016, :mWorkshop in Advances in Approximate Bayesian Inference, NIPS
- Houthooft, 2016, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 1109
- Hsu, 2016, :mSignal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA), 2016 Asia-Pacific, 1
- Hu, 2017, arXiv:1703.00955 · arXiv
- Huang, 2018, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 2083
- Jang, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Learning Representations
- Johnson, 2016, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2946
- Jozefowicz, 2015, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 2342
- Karl, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Learning Representations
- Kavukcuoglu, 2008, :mTech. rep.No. CBLL-TR-2008-12-01
- Kingma, 2014, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 3581
- Kingma, 2016, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 4743
- Kingma, 2015, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2575
- Kingma, 2014, :mInternational Conference on Learning Representations
- Kingma, 2015, :mInternational Conference on Learning Representations
- Krishnan, 2017, :MAAAI, 2101
- Kulkarni, 2015, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2539
- Kusner, 2017, :mProceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 70, 1945
- Larsen, 2016, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 1558
- Lazaro-Gredilla, 2014, International Conference on Machine Learning
- Li, 2016, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 1073
- Li, 2015, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 1718
- Louizos, 2017, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 3288
- Louizos, 2016, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 1708
- Louizos, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 2218
- Maal0e, 2016, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning
- Maddison, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Learning Representations
- Miao, 2016, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 1727
- Mnih, 2014, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning
- Mnih, 2016, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 2188
- Mohamed, 2015, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2125
- Molchanov, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 2498
- Naesseth, 2017, :mArtificial Intel ligence and Statistics, 489
- Paisley, 2012, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 1367
- Papamakarios, 2017, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2335
- Pritzel, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 2827
- Pu, 2016, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2352
- Ranganath, 2014, :mInternational Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 814
- Ranganath, 2016, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 324
- Ravanbakhsh, 2017, :mAAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
- Rezende, 2016, :mInternational Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning, 1521
- Rezende, 2014, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 1278
- Rezende, 2016, :mAdvances In Neural Information Processing Systems, 4997
- Rezende, 2015, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 1530
- Roeder, 2017, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 6925
- Roweis, 1998, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 626
- Ruiz, 2016, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 460
- Salakhutdinov, 2010, :mInternational Conference on Artificial Intel ligence and Statistics, 693
- Serban, 2017, :mProceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intel ligence
- Sohl-Dickstein, 2015, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 2256
- S0nderby, 2016, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning
- S0nderby, 2016, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 3738
- Szegedy, 2015, :mProceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1
- Tomczak, :mBenelearn 2017: Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Benelux Conference on Machine Learning, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 9-10 June 2017, 162
- Tran, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Learning Representations
- Van den Oord, 2016, :mAdvances in neural information processing systems, 4790
- Van Oord, 2016, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 1747
- Watter, 2015, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2746
- White, 2016, arXiv:1609.04468 · arXiv
- Xu, 2017, :MAAAI, 3358
- Yan, 2016, :mEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, 776
- Yang, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 3881
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sarker, I. H. (2021) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-021-00815-1 · Cited by 2,707 · see citing works
Diffusion Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Methods and Applications
Yang, L., Zhang, Z., Song, Y., Hong, S., Xu, R., Zhao, Y., Zhang, W., Cui, B., & Yang, M.-H. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3626235 · Cited by 1,704 · see citing works
A survey on security and privacy of federated learning
Mothukuri, V., Parizi, R. M., Pouriyeh, S., Huang, Y., Dehghantanha, A., & Srivastava, G. (2021) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2020.10.007 · Cited by 1,480 · see citing works
Recent advances and clinical applications of deep learning in medical image analysis
Chen, X., Wang, X., Zhang, K., Fung, K.-M. A., Thai, T., Moore, K. N., Mannel, R. S., Liu, H., Zheng, B., & Qiu, Y. (2022) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2022.102444 · Cited by 1,129 · see citing works
A Unifying Review of Deep and Shallow Anomaly Detection
Ruff, L., Kauffmann, J., Vandermeulen, R. A., Montavon, G., Samek, W., Kloft, M., Dietterich, T. G., & Muller, K.-R. (2021) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2021.3052449 · Cited by 1,080 · see citing works
Hands-On Bayesian Neural Networks—A Tutorial for Deep Learning Users
Jospin, L. V., Laga, H., Boussaid, F., Buntine, W., & Bennamoun, M. (2022) · IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine · doi:10.1109/mci.2022.3155327 · Cited by 879 · see citing works
Machine Learning in Drug Discovery: A Review
Dara, S., Dhamercherla, S., Jadav, S. S., Babu, C. M., & Ahsan, M. J. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-021-10058-4 · Cited by 843 · see citing works
Jusup, M., Holme, P., Kanazawa, K., Takayasu, M., Romić, I., Wang, Z., Geček, S., Lipić, T., Boris Podobnik, A., Wang, L., et al. (2022) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2021.10.005 · Cited by 662 · see citing works
Can deep learning beat numerical weather prediction?
Schultz, M. G., Betancourt, C., Gong, B., Kleinert, F., Langguth, M., Leufen, L. H., Mozaffari, A., & Stadtler, S. (2021) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2020.0097 · Cited by 599 · see citing works
Jin, M., Koh, H. Y., Wen, Q., Zambon, D., Alippi, C., Webb, G. I., King, I., & Pan, S. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3443141 · Cited by 567 · see citing works
A Survey on Generative Diffusion Models
Cao, H., Tan, C., Gao, Z., Xu, Y., Chen, G., Heng, P., & Li, S. Z. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2024.3361474 · Cited by 679 · see citing works
Reddy, S. (2024) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-024-01357-9 · Cited by 554 · see citing works
Deep learning in nano-photonics: inverse design and beyond
Wiecha, P. R., Arbouet, A., Girard, C., & Muskens, O. L. (2021) · Photonics Research · doi:10.1364/prj.415960 · Cited by 532 · see citing works
Machine Learning Methods for Small Data Challenges in Molecular Science
Dou, B., Zhu, Z., Merkurjev, E., Ke, L., Chen, L., Jian, J., Zhu, Y., Liu, J., Zhang, B., & Wei, G. (2023) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00189 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Nguyen, H. D., Tran, K. P., Thomassey, S., & Hamad, M. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102282 · Cited by 507 · see citing works
Jackson, I., Ivanov, D. A., Dolgui, A., & Namdar, J. (2024) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2024.2309309 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
Unleashing the Power of Edge-Cloud Generative AI in Mobile Networks: A Survey of AIGC Services
Xu, M., Du, H., Niyato, D. T., Kang, J., Xiong, Z., Mao, S., Han, Z., Jamalipour, A., Kim, D. I., Shen, X., et al. (2024) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2024.3353265 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
Uncertainty quantification in scientific machine learning: Methods, metrics, and comparisons
Psaros, A. F., Meng, X., Zou, Z., Guo, L., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2023) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111902 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
Prototype Augmentation and Self-Supervision for Incremental Learning
Zhu, F., Zhang, X.-Y., Wang, C., Yin, F., & Liu, C.-L. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00581 · Cited by 427 · see citing works
Inverse design of nanoporous crystalline reticular materials with deep generative models
Yao, Z., Sánchez-Lengeling, B., Bobbitt, N. S., Bucior, B. J., Kumar, S. G. H., Collins, S. P., Burns, T. D., Woo, T. K., Farha, O. K., Snurr, R. Q., et al. (2021) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-020-00271-1 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
Bengesi, S., El-Sayed, H., Sarker, M. K., Houkpati, Y., Irungu, J., & Oladunni, T. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3397775 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Deep Generative Models in Engineering Design: A Review
Regenwetter, L., Nobari, A. H., & Ahmed, F. (2022) · Journal of Mechanical Design · doi:10.1115/1.4053859 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Machine learning in aerodynamic shape optimization
Li, J., Du, X., & Martins, J. R. R. A. (2022) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2022.100849 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Yu, H., & Guo, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2023.1183162 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Generative AI Literacy: Twelve Defining Competencies
Annapureddy, R., Fornaroli, A., & Gatica-Perez, D. (2025) · Digital Government: Research and Practice · doi:10.1145/3685680 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Xu, Y., Quan, R., Xu, W., Huang, Y., Chen, X., & Liu, F. (2024) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering11101034 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Machine Learning for Social Science: An Agnostic Approach
Grimmer, J., Roberts, M. E., & Stewart, B. (2021) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-053119-015921 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Topic modeling algorithms and applications: A survey
Abdelrazek, A., Eid, Y., Gawish, E. K., Medhat, W., & Hassan, A. (2022) · Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.is.2022.102131 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Elahi, M., Afolaranmi, S. O., Lastra, J. L. M., & García, J. A. P. (2023) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-023-00089-x · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Proceedings of the 19th Python in Science Conference
(2020) · Proceedings of the Python in Science Conferences · doi:10.25080/majora-342d178e-02b · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Self-Supervised Learning for Time Series Analysis: Taxonomy, Progress, and Prospects
Zhang, K., Wen, Q., Zhang, C., Cai, R., Jin, M., Liu, Y., Zhang, J. Y., Liang, Y., Pang, G., Song, D., et al. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3387317 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
“Variationalautoencoder(VAE)isamodelbasedonvariational inference [78], [79].”
An introduction to deep generative modeling
Ruthotto, L., & Haber, E. (2021) · GAMM-Mitteilungen · doi:10.1002/gamm.202100008 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Ahmed, A. A., Sayed, S., Abdoulhalik, A., Moutari, S., & Oyedele, L. O. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140715 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Deep Learning Approaches to Grasp Synthesis: A Review
Newbury, R., Gu, M., Chumbley, L., Mousavian, A., Eppner, C., Leitner, J., Bohg, J., Morales, A., Asfour, T., Kragić, D., et al. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2023.3280597 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
EDGE: Editable Dance Generation From Music
Tseng, J., Castellon, R., & Liu, C. K. (2023) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00051 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Du, H., Zhang, R., Liu, Y., Wang, J., Lin, Y., Li, Z., Niyato, D. T., Kang, J., Xiong, Z., Cui, S. R., et al. (2024) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2024.3400011 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Antimicrobial peptides: An alternative to traditional antibiotics
Ji, S., An, F., Zhang, T., Lou, M., Guo, J., Liu, K., Zhu, Y., Wu, J., & Wu, R. (2023) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2023.116072 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Generative Adversarial Networks for Image and Video Synthesis: Algorithms and Applications
Liu, M.-Y., Huang, X., Yu, J., Wang, T.-C., & Mallya, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2021.3049196 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
The survey: Text generation models in deep learning
Iqbal, T., & Qureshi, S. (2020) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.04.001 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Deep Learning for PET Image Reconstruction
Reader, A. J., Corda-D’Incan, G., Mehranian, A., da Costa-Luis, C. O., Ellis, S., & Schnabel, J. A. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences · doi:10.1109/trpms.2020.3014786 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Real-Time Deep Anomaly Detection Framework for Multivariate Time-Series Data in Industrial IoT
Nizam, H., Zafar, S., Lv, Z., Wang, F., & Hu, X. (2022) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2022.3211874 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Baião, A. R., Cai, Z., Poulos, R. C., Robinson, P. J., Reddel, R. R., Zhong, Q., Vinga, S., & Gonçalves, E. (2025) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaf355 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Deep Learning in Protein Structural Modeling and Design
Gao, W., Mahajan, S. P., Sulam, J., & Gray, J. J. (2020) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2020.100142 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in drug discovery: applications and techniques
Deng, J., Yang, Z., Ojima, I., Samaras, D., & Wang, F. (2021) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbab430 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Modeling gene regulatory networks using neural network architectures
Shu, H., Zhou, J., Lian, Q., Li, H., Zhao, D. Y., Zeng, J., & Ma, J. (2021) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-021-00099-8 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Górriz, J. M., Álvarez, I., Álvarez-Marquina, A., Arco, J. E., Atzmueller, M., Ballarini, F., Barakova, E. I., Bologna, G., Bonomini, P., Castellanos-Dominguez, G., et al. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101945 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Iqbal, S., Qureshi, A. N., Li, J., & Mahmood, T. (2023) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-023-09899-9 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
RODIN: A Generative Model for Sculpting 3D Digital Avatars Using Diffusion
Wang, T., Zhang, B., Zhang, T., Gu, S., Bao, J., Baltrušaitis, T., Shen, J., Chen, D., Wen, F., Chen, Q., et al. (2023) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00443 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Marey, A., Arjmand, P., alerab, A. D. S., Eslami, M. J., Saad, A. M., Sanchez, N., & Umair, M. (2024) · The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.1186/s43055-024-01356-2 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
UVCGAN: UNet Vision Transformer cycle-consistent GAN for unpaired image-to-image translation
Torbunov, D., Huang, Y., Yu, H.-W., Huang, J., Yoo, S., Lin, M., Viren, B., & Ren, Y. (2022) · IEEE Workshop/Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv56688.2023.00077 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Taeihagh, A. (2025) · Policy and Society · doi:10.1093/polsoc/puaf001 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Dynamical Variational Autoencoders: A Comprehensive Review
Laurent Girin, B., Leglaive, S., Bie, X., Diard, J., Hueber, T., & Alameda-Pineda, X. (2021) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000089 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Deep learning in automated ultrasonic NDE – Developments, axioms and opportunities
Cantero‐Chinchilla, S., Wilcox, P. D., & Croxford, A. J. (2022) · NDT & E International · doi:10.1016/j.ndteint.2022.102703 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Celard, P., Iglesias, E. L., Sorribes-Fdez, J. M., Romero, R., Vieira, A. S., & Borrajo, L. (2023) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-022-07953-4 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Machine learning in scanning transmission electron microscopy
Kalinin, S. V., Ophus, C., Voyles, P. M., Erni, R., Kepaptsoglou, D. M., Grillo, V., Lupini, A. R., Oxley, M. P., Schwenker, E., Chan, M. K. Y., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-022-00095-w · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence for Materials Discovery, Development, and Optimization
Madika, B., Saha, A., Kang, C., Buyantogtokh, B., Agar, J., Wolverton, C. M., Voorhees, P. W., Littlewood, P. B., Kalinin, S. V., & Hong, S. (2025) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.5c04200 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Variational encoding approach for interpretable assessment of remaining useful life estimation
Costa, N., & Sánchez, L. (2022) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2022.108353 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Applications of artificial intelligence in cardiovascular imaging
Maxime Sermesant, B., Delingette, H., Cochet, H., Jaı̈s, P., & Ayache, N. (2021) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/s41569-021-00527-2 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Weakly supervised machine learning
Ren, Z., Wang, S., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology · doi:10.1049/cit2.12216 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Cinelli, L. P., Marins, M. A., da Silva, E. A. B., & Netto, S. L. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-70679-1_5 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Interpretable and explainable machine learning: A methods‐centric overview with concrete examples
Marcinkevičs, R., & Vogt, J. E. (2023) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1493 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Ghimire, P., Kim, K., & Acharya, M. (2024) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings14010220 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
“These components work in tandem to support each other’s operations [86].”
Residual Denoising Diffusion Models
Liu, J., Wang, Q., Fan, H., Wang, Y., Tang, Y., & Qu, L. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.00268 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
A Comprehensive Overview and Comparative Analysis on Deep Learning Models: CNN, RNN, LSTM, GRU
Shiri, F. M., Perumal, T., Mustapha, N., & Mohamed, R. (2023) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.32604/jai.2024.054314 · Cited by 537 · see citing works
Kattenborn, T., Schiefer, F., Frey, J., Feilhauer, H., Mahecha, M. D., & Dormann, C. F. (2022) · ISPRS Open Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.ophoto.2022.100018 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Fragment‐based drug discovery—the importance of high‐quality molecule libraries
Bon, M., Bilsland, A. E., Bower, J. F., & McAulay, K. (2022) · Molecular Oncology · doi:10.1002/1878-0261.13277 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence for Surface‐Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy
Bi, X., Lin, L. L., Chen, Z., & Ye, J. (2023) · Small Methods · doi:10.1002/smtd.202301243 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
A comprehensive overview of Deepfake: generation, detection, datasets, and opportunities
Seow, J. W., Lim, M. K., Phan, R. C. W., & Liu, J. K. (2022) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2022.09.135 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Machine learning accelerates the materials discovery
Fang, J., Xie, M., He, X., Zhang, J., Hu, J., Chen, Y., Yang, Y., & Jin, Q. (2022) · Materials Today Communications · doi:10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104900 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Machine learning in the search for new fundamental physics
Karagiorgi, G., Kasieczka, G., Kravitz, S., Nachman, B., & Shih, D. (2021) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-022-00455-1 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Wang, Y., Wang, L., & Siau, K. L. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2316376 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Ziatdinov, M. A., Ghosh, A., Wong, C. Y., & Kalinin, S. V. (2022) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00555-8 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Tabular and latent space synthetic data generation: a literature review
Fonseca, J., & Bação, F. (2023) · Journal Of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-023-00792-7 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Belay, M. A., Blakseth, S. S., Rasheed, A., & Rossi, P. S. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23052844 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning: A Survey and Open Research Challenges
Hutsebaut-Buysse, M., Mets, K., & Latré, S. (2022) · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · doi:10.3390/make4010009 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
A systematic review of digital transformation technologies in museum exhibition
Li, J., Zheng, X., Watanabe, I., & Ochiai, Y. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108407 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Learning nonlinear state–space models using autoencoders
Masti, D., & Bemporad, A. (2021) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2021.109666 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Machine learning for high-throughput experimental exploration of metal halide perovskites
Ahmadi, M., Ziatdinov, M., Zhou, Y.-Y., Lass, E., & Kalinin, S. V. (2021) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2021.10.001 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Deep learning: as the new frontier in high-throughput plant phenotyping
Arya, S., Sandhu, K. S., Singh, J., & Kumar, S. (2022) · Euphytica · doi:10.1007/s10681-022-02992-3 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
One step forward for smart chemical process fault detection and diagnosis
Bi, X., Qin, R., Wu, D., Zheng, S., & Zhao, J. (2022) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107884 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
PAST-AI: Physical-Layer Authentication of Satellite Transmitters via Deep Learning
Oligeri, G., Sciancalepore, S., Raponi, S., & Pietro, R. D. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2022.3219287 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
In-Depth Review of YOLOv1 to YOLOv10 Variants for Enhanced Photovoltaic Defect Detection
Hussain, M., & Khanam, R. (2024) · Solar · doi:10.3390/solar4030016 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
He, W., Dai, Y., Zheng, Y., Wu, Y., Cao, Z., Liu, D., Jiang, P., Yang, M., Huang, F., Si, L., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i10.21320 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Markus, B., Gruber Christian, C., Andreas, K., Kummer, A., Stefan, L., Oberdorfer, G., Elina, S., & Šnajdrová, R. (2023) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.3c03417 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence‐Driven Nanoarchitectonics for Smart Targeted Drug Delivery
Bae, H., Ji, H., Konstantinov, K., Sluyter, R., Ariga, K., Kim, J. H., & Kim, J. H. (2025) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202510239 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Dynamical Variational Autoencoders: A Comprehensive Review
Laurent Girin, B., Leglaive, S., Bie, X., Diard, J., Hueber, T., & Alameda-Pineda, X. (2021) · doi:10.1561/9781680839135 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Dwivedi, V., Parashar, N., & Srinivasan, B. (2020) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2020.09.006 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Recent Advances for Quantum Neural Networks in Generative Learning
Tian, J., Sun, X., Du, Y., Zhao, S., Liu, Q., Zhang, K., Yi, W., Huang, W., Wang, C., Wu, X., et al. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2023.3272029 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in the Multi-Omics Approach to Gut Microbiota
Rozera, T., Pasolli, E., Segata, N., & Ianiro, G. (2025) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2025.02.035 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Zero-Shot Medical Image Translation via Frequency-Guided Diffusion Models
Li, Y., Shao, H.-C., Liang, X., Chen, L., Li, R., Jiang, S., Wang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2023.3325703 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Foundation Models in Radiology: What, How, Why, and Why Not
Paschali, M., Chen, Z., Blankemeier, L., Varma, M., Youssef, A., Blüthgen, C., Langlotz, C. P., Gatidis, S., & Chaudhari, A. S. (2025) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.240597 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Das, S., Seferbekov, S., Datta, A., Islam, M. S., & Amin, M. R. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW) · doi:10.1109/iccvw54120.2021.00421 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Bi, X., & Zhao, J. (2021) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2021.10.036 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Adaptive deep learning framework for robust unsupervised underwater image enhancement
Saleh, A., Sheaves, M. J., Jerry, D. R., & Azghadi, M. R. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.126314 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Silva, A. B., Littlejohn, K. T., Liu, J. R., Moses, D. A., & Chang, E. F. (2024) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-024-00819-9 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
“One potential avenue is to leverage advancements in self-supervised learning 189 to learn latent representations that best capture behaviour-related dynamics, even when noise is present in the neural activity 121,190–194 .”
Bhat, V., Callaway, C. P., & Risko, C. M. (2023) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00704 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Deep learning in electron microscopy
Ede, J. M. (2020) · Machine Learning Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/abd614 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
An Overview of Variational Autoencoders for Source Separation, Finance, and Bio-Signal Applications
Singh, A., & Ogunfunmi, T. (2021) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e24010055 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Deep Autoencoder Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Review and New Perspectives
Mienye, I. D., & Swart, T. G. (2025) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-025-10260-5 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
AutoLog: Anomaly detection by deep autoencoding of system logs
Catillo, M., Pecchia, A., & Villano, U. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116263 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- Qualcomm (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Welling, Max
- Venue
- Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2019-11-28
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 307-392
- ISSN
- 1935-8237 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-8245
- OpenAlex
- W2948978827
- Semantic Scholar
- 329b84a919bfd1771be5bd14fa81e7b3f74cc961
- Cited by
- 2,609
- References
- 171
- Citations by year
- 2026: 390 · 2025: 599 · 2024: 597 · 2023: 434 · 2022: 276 · 2021: 223 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 67.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Keywords
- variational autoencoder, latent variable models, variational inference, deep generative models, probabilistic inference
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review