Cited by 2,609Gaussian Processes and Bayesian InferenceTopic ModelingNeural Networks and Applications

An Introduction to Variational Autoencoders

Open access
Kingma, Diederik P., Welling, Max·2019·Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning

Abstract

Variational autoencoders provide a principled framework for learning deep latent-variable models and corresponding inference models. In this work, we provide an introduction to variational autoencoders and some important extensions.

Verified 2026-10-10 · 2 references not checked yet

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This monograph introduces variational autoencoders (VAEs) as a framework for jointly learning deep latent-variable models and amortized inference models via stochastic gradient descent on the evidence lower bound (ELBO). It also reviews extensions including inverse autoregressive flows, auxiliary latent variables, and deeper generative models.

Key findings

  • A VAE couples a generative model \(p_\theta(x,z)\) with an inference/recognition model \(q_\phi(z|x)\); maximizing the ELBO \(L_{\theta,\phi}(x)=E_{q_\phi(z|x)}[\log p_\theta(x,z)-\log q_\phi(z|x)]\) simultaneously improves the marginal likelihood and tightens the posterior approximation (eqs. 2.10–2.12).
  • The reparameterization trick expresses continuous latent variables as \(z=g(\epsilon,\phi,x)\), enabling unbiased, low-variance gradients of the ELBO with respect to both generative and variational parameters (section 2.4).
  • Inverse autoregressive flow (IAF) is proposed as a normalizing flow that scales to high-dimensional latent spaces and has a simple log-determinant, improving posterior flexibility (chapter 3).
  • The text reports follow-up results: VAE-based semi-supervised MNIST classification with under 1% error using only 10 labeled images per class; VAE semi-supervised ImageNet accuracy around 45% with 1% labels versus GoogLeNet around 5%; free bits worked for \(\lambda \in [0.125,0.25,0.5,1,2]\); and a 100x improvement in synthesis speed for parallelizable models.

Methods

  • Design: an introductory monograph/tutorial, described as an expanded version of Kingma and Welling (2014), covering background, VAE basics, advanced inference techniques, and advanced generative models.
  • Data or sample: no new empirical dataset is introduced; the work discusses methods and cites applications and experiments from the literature, including CIFAR-10, MNIST, ImageNet, chemical design, natural-language synthesis, astronomy, and image resynthesis.
  • Main analysis: mathematical derivation of the ELBO, reparameterization gradients, factorized and full-covariance Gaussian posteriors, importance-sampling marginal-likelihood estimation, normalizing flows/IAF, and autoregressive/invertible generative models.

Limitations

  • Stated: “This is not aimed to be a comprehensive review of all related work,” and the reader is assumed to have basic knowledge of algebra, calculus, and probability theory.
  • Stated challenges: unmodified ELBO optimization can get stuck in an undesirable stable equilibrium; blurriness arises from the direction of the KL divergence; importance-weighted estimates scale poorly to high-dimensional latent spaces; autoregressive sampling is sequential with \(O(D)\) computation; and normalizing flows constrain intermediate states to the data dimensionality.
  • Evident: as an introduction/review, the paper does not present a new controlled empirical benchmark; many numerical results are cited from other papers rather than original experiments.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1561/2200000056

Cites

155 of 157 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 76 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingcitation

    Stochastic optimization with the unmodified lower bound objective can get stuck in an undesirable stable equilibrium.

    “In our work, consistent with findings in (Bowman et al., 2015) and (Sønderby et al., 2016a), we found that stochastic optimization with the unmodified lower bound objective can gets stuck in an undesirable stable equilibrium.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bowman et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Sønderby et al., 2016a

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingnone given

    Reversing the ordering of the variables after each step in the IAF chain improved results.

    “It was found that results improved when reversing the ordering of the variables after each step in the IAF chain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    The framework of variational autoencoders provides a principled method for jointly learning deep latent-variable models and corresponding inference models using stochastic gradient descent.

    “The framework of variational autoencoders (VAEs) (Kingma and Welling, 2014;Rezende et al., 2014) provides a principled method for jointly learning deep latent-variable models and corresponding inference models using stochastic gradient descent.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kingma and Welling, 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rezende et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisenone given

    The VAE learning rules follow from a single approximation to the maximum likelihood objective.

    “The VAE learning rules instead follow from a single approximation to the maximum likelihood objective.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Interpretationreasoning

    In the VAE framework, sampling induces sampling noise in the gradients required for learning.

    “However the price we pay is that this sampling induces sampling noise in the gradients required for learning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 39
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 77
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    IAF greatly improves the flexibility of posterior distributions and allows for a much better fit between the posteriors and the prior.

    “IAF greatly improves the flexibility of the posterior distributions, and allows for a much better fit between the posteriors and the prior.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    A more flexible way to parameterize conditional distributions in directed graphical models is with neural networks.

    “As we explained above, a more flexible way to parameterize such conditional distributions is with neural networks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    VAEs, like other likelihood-based models, generate more dispersed samples but are better density models in terms of the likelihood criterion.

    “VAEs, like other likelihood-based models, generate more dispersed samples, but are better density models in terms of the likelihood criterion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Under the i.i.d. assumption, the probability of the datapoints given the parameters factorizes as a product of individual datapoint probabilities.

    “Under the i.i.d.assumption, the probability of the datapoints given the parameters factorizes as a product of individual datapoint probabilities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The datapoints in dataset D are independent samples from an unchanging underlying distribution.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Stochastic gradient descent is a more efficient method for optimization than batch gradient descent.

    “A more efficient method for optimization is stochastic gradient descent (SGD) (section A.3), which uses randomly drawn minibatches of data M ⊂ D of size N M .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites section A.3

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The VAE recognition model can be arbitrarily complex but is still reasonably fast because it can be done using a single feedforward pass from input to latent variables.

    “This recognition model can be arbitrary complex but is still reasonably fast because by construction it can be done using a single feedforward pass from input to latent variables.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    In ordinary variational inference, each data-case has a separate variational distribution, which is inefficient for large data-sets.

    “This in contrast to VI where each data-case has a separate variational distribution, which is inefficient for large data-sets.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Deep learning has been shown to work well for a large variety of classification and regression problems.

    “At the time of writing, deep learning has been shown to work well for a large variety of classification and regression problems, as summarized in (LeCun et al., 2015;Goodfellow et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites LeCun et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Goodfellow et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    If all variables in a directed graphical model are observed in the data, we can compute and differentiate the log-probability of the data under the model, leading to relatively straightforward optimization.

    “If all variables in the directed graphical model are observed in the data, then we can compute and differentiate the log-probability of the data under the model, leading to relatively straightforward optimization.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The unbiased estimator of the log-probability on a minibatch is differentiable, yielding unbiased stochastic gradients.

    “The unbiased estimator log p θ (M) is differentiable, yielding the unbiased stochastic gradients:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    GANs can generate images of high subjective perceptual quality but tend to lack full support over the data.

    “while GANs can generate images of high subjective perceptual quality, they tend to lack full support over the data (Grover et al., 2018), as opposed to likelihood-based generative models.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Grover et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Maximization of the log-likelihood criterion is equivalent to minimization of a Kullback-Leibler divergence between the data and model distributions.

    “As we will explain, maximization of the log-likelihood criterion is equivalent to minimization of a Kullback Leibler divergence between the data and model distributions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The Kullback-Leibler divergence between qφ(z|x) and pθ(z|x) is non-negative and zero if and only if qφ(z|x) equals the true posterior distribution.

    “The second term in eq.(2.8) is the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between q φ (z|x) and p θ (z|x), which is non-negative:”
    • Also stated in: § 2.2 Evidence Lower Bound (ELBO) · plain
      “and zero if, and only if, q φ (z|x) equals the true posterior distribution.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    The inference model in a VAE can be almost any directed graphical model.

    “Like a DLVM, the inference model can be (almost) any directed graphical model:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    The distribution qφ(z|x) can be parameterized using deep neural networks.

    “And also similar to a DLVM, the distribution q φ (z|x) can be parameterized using deep neural networks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    For continuous latent variables z, the marginal pθ(x) can be seen as an infinite mixture, which is potentially more powerful than discrete mixtures.

    “For continuous z, p θ (x) can be seen as an infinite mixture, which are potentially more powerful than discrete mixtures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Traditional inference methods are relatively expensive, often requiring a per-datapoint optimization loop or yielding bad posterior approximations.

    “Traditional inference methods are relatively expensive.Such methods, for example, often require a per-datapoint optimization loop, or yield bad posterior approximations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The KL divergence determines the gap between the ELBO and the marginal likelihood (the tightness of the bound); the better qφ(z|x) approximates the true posterior, the smaller the gap.

    “The gap between the ELBO L θ,φ (x) and the marginal likelihood log p θ (x); this is also called the tightness of the bound.The better q φ (z|x) approximates the true (posterior) distribution p θ (z|x), in terms of the KL divergence, the smaller the gap.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    If the latent variable z is discrete and the conditional pθ(x|z) is Gaussian, then the marginal pθ(x) is a mixture-of-Gaussians distribution.

    “If z is discrete and p θ (x|z) is a Gaussian distribution, then p θ (x) is a mixtureof-Gaussians distribution.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    With amortized inference we can avoid a per-datapoint optimization loop and leverage the efficiency of stochastic gradient descent.

    “With amortized inference we can avoid a per-datapoint optimization loop, and leverage the efficiency of SGD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Since the joint distribution pθ(x,z) is tractable to compute, a tractable marginal likelihood pθ(x) leads to a tractable posterior pθ(z|x), and vice versa; both are intractable in deep latent-variable models.

    “Since p θ (x, z) is tractable to compute, a tractable marginal likelihood p θ (x) leads to a tractable posterior p θ (z|x), and vice versa.Both are intractable in DLVMs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Maximization of the ELBO with respect to θ and φ will concurrently approximately maximize the marginal likelihood and minimize the KL divergence of qφ(z|x) from the true posterior.

    “By looking at equation 2.11, it can be understood that maximization of the ELBO L θ,φ (x) w.r.t. the parameters θ and φ, will concurrently optimize the two things we care about: 1.It will approximately maximize the marginal likelihood p θ (x).”
    • Also stated in: § 2.2.1 Two for One · plain
      “2. It will minimize the KL divergence of the approximation q φ (z|x) from the true posterior p θ (z|x), so q φ (z|x) becomes better.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    The optimization objective of the variational autoencoder is the evidence lower bound (ELBO).

    “The optimization objective of the variational autoencoder, like in other variational methods, is the evidence lower bound, abbreviated as ELBO.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The posterior over the parameters of neural networks, p(θ|D), is generally intractable to compute exactly and requires approximate inference techniques.

    “Likewise, the posterior over the parameters of (directed models parameterized with) neural networks, p(θ|D), is generally intractable to compute exactly, and requires approximate inference techniques.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The individual-datapoint ELBO and its gradient are, in general, intractable, but good unbiased estimators exist such that minibatch SGD can still be performed.

    “The individual-datapoint ELBO, and its gradient ∇ θ,φ L θ,φ (x) is, in general, intractable.However, good unbiased estimators ∇θ,φ L θ,φ (x) exist, as we will show, such that we can still perform minibatch SGD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    We can build very flexible transformations g() for which the log-determinant is simple to compute, resulting in highly flexible inference models qφ(z|x).

    “As we will show, we can build very flexible transformations g() for which log d φ (x, ) is simple to compute, resulting in highly flexible inference models q φ (z|x).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    At the start of training, the likelihood term log p(x|z) is relatively weak, so an initially attractive state is q(z|x) ≈ p(z), resulting in a stable equilibrium from which it is difficult to escape.

    “At the start of training, the likelihood term log p(x|z) is relatively weak, such that an initially attractive state is where q(z|x) ≈ p(z), resulting in a stable equilibrium from which it is difficult to escape.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The ELBO can be viewed as a maximum likelihood objective in an augmented space.

    “One additional perspective is that the ELBO can be viewed as a maximum likelihood objective in an augmented space.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Importance weighted estimates have notoriously bad scaling properties to high-dimensional latent spaces.

    “The downside of these approaches for optimizing a tighter bound, is that importance weighted estimates have notoriously bad scaling properties to high-dimensional latent spaces.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Issues with 'blurriness' can be countered by choosing a sufficiently flexible inference model and/or a sufficiently flexible generative model.

    “Issues with 'blurriness' can thus can be countered by choosing a sufficiently flexible inference model, and/or a sufficiently flexible generative model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The free bits method is a modification of the ELBO objective that ensures that on average a certain minimum number of bits of information are encoded per latent variable, or per group of latent variables.

    “An alternative proposed in (Kingma et al., 2016) is the method of free bits: a modification of the ELBO objective, that ensures that on average, a certain minimum number of bits of information are encoded per latent variable, or per group of latent variables.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kingma et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The VAE objective contains a regularization term dictated by the variational bound, lacking the usual nuisance regularization hyper-parameter required to learn useful representations.

    “The VAE objective contains a regularization term dictated by the variational bound, lacking the usual nuisance regularization hyper-parameter required to learn useful representations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The linear autoencoder approach is limited to linear-Gaussian models, while the VAE approach applies to a much broader class of continuous latent variable models.

    “However, this approach using linear autoencoders is limited to linear-Gaussian models, while our approach applies to a much broader class of continuous latent variable models.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Increasing the flexibility and accuracy of the inference model generally improves the tightness of the variational bound (ELBO), bringing it closer to the true marginal likelihood objective.

    “Increasing the flexibility and accuracy of the inference model wel generally improve the tightness of the variational bound (ELBO), bringing it closer the true marginal likelihood objective.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    For efficient optimization of the ELBO, the inference model must be computationally efficient to compute and differentiate its probability density qφ(z|x) and computationally efficient to sample from.

    “Requirements for the inference model, in order to be able to efficiently optimize the ELBO, are that it is (1) computationally efficient to compute and differentiate its probability density q φ (z|x), and (2) computationally efficient to sample from, since both these operations need to be performed for each datapoint in a minibatch at every iteration of optimization.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The larger variance of pθ under imperfect fit is due to the direction of the KL divergence; the reverse is not true: the generative model is only slightly penalized when putting probability mass on values of (x,z) with no support under q_D,φ.

    “This is due to the direction of the KL divergence; if there are values of (x, z) which are likely under q D,φ but not under p θ , the term E q D,φ (x,z) [log p θ (x, z)] will go to infinity.However, the reverse is not true: the generative model is only slightly penalized when putting probability mass on values of (x, z) with no support under q D,φ .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Planar and radial flows are effective for problems with a relatively low-dimensional latent space.

    “These flows are shown to be effective to problems with a relatively low-dimensional latent space.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rezende and Mohamed, 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Inverse autoregressive flow (IAF) is a member of the family of normalizing flows.

    “As we explained, inverse autoregressive flow (IAF) is a member of the family of normalizing flows, first discussed in (Rezende and Mohamed, 2015) in the context of stochastic variational inference.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rezende and Mohamed, 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    It is not clear how to scale planar and radial flows to much higher-dimensional latent spaces, such as latent spaces of generative models of larger images, and how they can leverage the topology of latent space as IAF can.

    “It is not clear, however, how to scale such flows to much higher-dimensional latent spaces, such as latent spaces of generative models of larger images, and how planar and radial flows can leverage the topology of latent space, as is possible with IAF.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Both x and z can be composed of multiple variables with some topological ordering.

    “Both x and z can be composed of multiple variables with some topological ordering.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A special case of IAF with one step and a linear autoregressive model is the fully Gaussian posterior, transforming a Gaussian variable with diagonal covariance to a Gaussian distribution with full covariance.

    “It is straightforward to see that a special case of IAF with one step, and a linear autoregressive model, is the fully Gaussian posterior discussed earlier.This transforms a Gaussian variable with diagonal covariance, to one with linear dependencies, i.e. a Gaussian distribution with full covariance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The scalar value log pθ(x,z) - log qφ(z|x) is differentiable and optimizable with SGD.

    “It is also differentiable and optimizable with SGD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Hamiltonian Variational Inference transformations are guided by the exact posterior distribution and leave this distribution invariant for small step sizes.

    “This type of transformation has the additional benefit that it is guided by the exact posterior distribution, and that it leaves this distribution invariant for small step sizes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Salimans et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The generative model pθ(x,z) and corresponding inference model qφ(z|x) can be parameterized as any directed graph.

    “The generative model p θ (x, z), and corresponding inference model q φ (z|x) can be parameterized as any directed graph.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The best models to date, in terms of attained log-likelihood on test data, employ a combination of latent variables, full autoregression, and invertible transformations with tractable Jacobian determinant.

    “The best models to date, in terms of attained log-likelihood on test data, employ a combination of the three approaches listed above.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    In the case of continuous data, autoregressive models can be interpreted as a special case of learning an invertible transformation with tractable Jacobian determinant from the data to a simpler known distribution.

    “In case of continuous data, autoregressive models can be interpreted as a special case of a more general approach: learning an invertible transformation with tractable Jacobian determinant (also called normalizing flow) from the data to a simpler, known distribution such as a Gaussian or Uniform distribution.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    The length of computation of the log-likelihood of fully autoregressive models does not necessarily scale with the dimensionality of the data.

    “The length of computation of the log-likelihood of fully autoregressive models does not necesarilly scale with the dimensionality of the data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Shared ordering allows sharing parameters between inference and generative models, leading to faster learning and better solutions.

    “One advantage of shared ordering, as explained in these works, is that this allows us to easily share parameters between the inference and generative models, leading to faster learning and better solutions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Salimans, 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Sønderby et al., 2016a

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kingma et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    When pθ(zi|Pa(zi)) is Gaussian distributed, the inference model can be directly specified as the product of this Gaussian distribution with a learned quadratic pseudo-likelihood term.

    “This coupling is especially straightforward when p θ (z i |P a(z i )) is Gaussian distributed.The inference model can be directly specified as the product of this Gaussian distribution, with a learned quadratic pseudo-likelihood term:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A less constraining variant is to let the neural network parameterizing qφ(zi|Pa(zi),x) be partially specified by a part of the neural network parameterizing pθ(zi|Pa(zi)).

    “A less constraining variant, explored by (Kingma et al., 2016), is to simply let the neural network that parameterizes q φ (z i |P a(z i ), x) be partially specified by a part of the neural network that parameterizes p θ (z i |P a(z i )).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kingma et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In Gómez-Bombarelli et al., 2018, a VAE is trained on hundreds of thousands of existing chemical structures, and the resulting continuous representation is used for gradient-based optimization towards certain properties, demonstrated on the design of drug-like molecules and organic light-emitting diodes.

    “One example of a recent scientific application of artificial creativity, is shown in Gómez-Bombarelli et al., 2018.In this paper, a fairly straightforward VAE is trained on hundreds of thousands of existing chemical structures.The resulting continuous representation (latent space) is subsequently used to perform gradient-based optimization towards certain properties; the method is demonstrated on”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gómez-Bombarelli et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    When no single natural one-dimensional ordering exists, like in two-dimensional images, this leads to a model with a somewhat awkward inductive bias.

    “When no single natural one-dimensional ordering exists, like in two-dimensional images, this leads to a model with a somewhat awkward inductive bias.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    A disadvantage of autoregressive models compared to latent-variable models is that ancestral sampling is a sequential operation of O(D) length, proportional to the dimensionality of the data.

    “A disadvantage of autoregressive models, compared to latent-variable models, is that ancestral sampling from autoregressive models is a sequential operation computation of O(D) length, i.e. proportional to the dimensionality of the data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    At the time of writing, no such model has yet been demonstrated to lead to similar performance as purely autoregressive or VAE-based models in terms of data log-likelihood.

    “At the time of writing, no such model has yet been demonstrated to lead to the similar performance as purely autoregressive or VAE-based models in terms of data log-likelihood, but this remains an active area of research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In Bowman et al., 2015, a VAE can be successfully trained on text, and the model successfully interpolates between sentences and imputes missing words.

    “A similar approach was used to generating natural-language sentences from a continuous space by Bowman et al., 2015.In this paper, it is shown how a VAE can be successfully trained on text.The model is shown to succesfully interpolate between sentences, and for imputation of missing words.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bowman et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    VAE-based techniques are among state of the art for semi-supervised classification, with on average under 1% classification error on MNIST when trained with only 10 labeled images per class.

    “Techniques based on VAEs are now among state of the art for semisupervised classification (Maaløe et al., 2016), with on average under 1% classification error in the MNIST classification problem, when trained with only 10 labeled images per class, i.e. when more than 99.8% of the labels in the training set were removed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Maaløe et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Autoregressive models require choosing a specific ordering of input elements.

    “Autoregressive models also require choosing a specific ordering of input elements (equation (4.8)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    NICE and Real NVP flows have equal computational cost and depth in both directions, making them relatively cheap to optimize and sample from.

    “In (Dinh et al., 2014;Dinh et al., 2016), particularly interesting flows (NICE and Real NVP) were introduced, with equal computational cost and depth in both directions, making it both relatively cheap to optimize and to sample from such models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Dinh et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Dinh et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    If neural networks are used for invertible mappings, this is a powerful and flexible approach towards probabilistic modeling of continuous data and nonlinear independent component analysis.

    “If we use neural networks for such invertible mappings, this is a powerful and flexible approach towards probabilistic modeling of continuous data and nonlinear independent component analysis (Deco and Brauer, 1995).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Deco and Brauer, 1995

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    At the time of writing, the best systems use a combination of autoregressive models, invertible transformations, and VAEs.

    “The techniques of autoregressive models and invertible transformations can be naturally combined with variational autoencoders, and at the time of writing, the best systems use a combination Rezende and Mohamed, 2015;Kingma et al., 2016;Gulrajani et al., 2017.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Rezende and Mohamed, 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kingma et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gulrajani et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    The constraint that normalizing flows iteratively update a variable of the same dimensionality as the data can make such transformations more challenging to optimize than methods without such constraint.

    “This constraint on the dimensionality of intermediate states of the mapping can make such transformations more challenging to optimize than methods without such constraint.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Normalizing flows were proposed as a framework for improving the flexibility of inference models.

    “Normalizing flows (Rezende and Mohamed, 2015) were proposed as a framework for improving the flexibility of inference models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rezende and Mohamed, 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In Kingma et al., 2016, the first normalizing flow was proposed that scales well to high-dimensional latent spaces.

    “In Kingma et al., 2016, the first normalizing flow was proposed that scales well to high-dimensional latent spaces.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kingma et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The ELBO objective can be generalized into an importance-weighted objective, as proposed in Burda et al., 2015.

    “The ELBO objective can be generalized into an importance-weighted objective, as proposed in (Burda et al., 2015) (Importance-Weighted Autoencoders).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Burda et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In Kingma et al., 2015, a refined method, the local reparameterization trick, further decreases the variance of the gradient estimator and was applied to estimation of Gaussian parameter posteriors.

    “In (Kingma et al., 2015) we describe a refined method, the local reparameterization trick, for further decreasing the variance of the gradient estimator, and applied it to estimation of Gaussian parameter posteriors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kingma et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Deep models with multiple stochastic layers can improve the variational bound, as demonstrated in Sønderby et al., 2016a and Sønderby et al., 2016b as Ladder VAEs.

    “Similarly, one can use deep models with multiple stochastic layers to improve the variational bound, as demonstrated in (Sønderby et al., 2016a) and (Sønderby et al., 2016b) as Ladder VAEs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Sønderby et al., 2016a

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Sønderby et al., 2016b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In Salimans et al., 2015, auxiliary variables were used in a combination of variational inference with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, with momentum variables as auxiliary variables.

    “In this paper, the principle was used in a combination of variational inference with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC), with the momentum variables of HMC as auxiliary variables.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Salimans et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In addition to Kingma and Welling, 2014, two later papers proposed equivalent algorithms, with Lázaro-Gredilla, 2014 applying the same reparameterization gradient method to estimation of parameter posteriors rather than amortized latent-variable inference.

    “In addition to our original publication (Kingma and Welling, 2014), two later papers have proposed equivalent algorithms (Rezende et al., 2014;Lázaro-Gredilla, 2014), where the latter work applies the same reparameterization gradient method to the estimation of parameter posteriors, rather than amortized latent-variable inference.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Rezende et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lázaro-Gredilla, 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The intermediate sentences generated by the VAE are grammatically correct, and the topic and syntactic structure are typically locally consistent.

    “The intermediate sentences are grammatically correct, and the topic and syntactic structure are typically locally consistent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bowman et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Auxiliary variables can be used to improve posterior flexibility, first proposed in Salimans et al., 2015.

    “As an alternative to (or in conjunction with) normalizing flows, one can use auxiliary variables to improve posterior flexibility.This principle was, to the best of our knowledge, first proposed in Salimans et al., 2015.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Salimans et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Importance-weighted objective potentially reduces variance in gradient but can be difficult to scale to high-dimensional latent spaces.

    “This potentially reduces the variance in the gradient, but has not been discussed in-depth here since (as often the case with importance-weighted estimators) it can be difficult to scale to highdimensional latent spaces.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Since VAEs can transform discrete observation spaces to continuous latent-variable spaces with approximately known marginals, they are interesting for use in model-based control.

    “Since VAEs can transform discrete observation spaces to continuous latent-variable spaces with approximately known marginals, they are interesting for use in model-based control (Watter et al., 2015;Pritzel et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Watter et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Pritzel et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Such models can be made incredibly flexible by parameterizing the conditional distributions with differentiable deep neural networks.

    “Such models can be made incredibly flexible by parameterizing the conditional distributions with differentiable deep neural networks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    The inference model approximates the posterior distribution of the latent variables of the generative model.

    “The inference model, also called encoder or recognition model, approximates the posterior distribution of the latent variables of the generative model.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Both generative and inference models are directed graphical models wholly or partially parameterized by deep neural networks.

    “Both the generative model and the inference model are directed graphical models that are wholly or partially parameterized by deep neural networks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    In VI, inference is cast as an optimization problem over newly introduced variational parameters, typically optimized towards the ELBO, a lower bound on model evidence or marginal likelihood.

    “In VI, inference is cast as an optimization problem over newly introduced variational parameters, typically optimized towards the ELBO, a lower bound on the model evidence, or marginal likelihood of the data.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The proposed VAE framework remains the only framework in the literature that allows for both discrete and continuous observed variables, allows for efficient amortized latent-variable inference and fast synthesis, and can produce close to state-of-the-art performance in terms of log-likelihood of data.

    “The proposed VAE framework remains the only framework in the literature that allows for both discrete and continuous observed variables, allows for efficient amortized latent-variable inference and fast synthesis, and which can produce close to state-of-the-art performance in terms of the log-likelihood of data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    A VAE is a combination of a deep latent-variable model with continuous latent variables and an associated inference model.

    “A VAE is a combination of a deep latent-variable model (DLVM) with continuous latent variables, and an associated inference model.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Stochastic gradients necessary for SGD are obtained through a basic reparameterization trick.

    “Stochastic gradients, necessary for performing SGD, are obtained through a basic reparameterization trick.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The VAE framework is now a commonly used tool for various applications of probabilistic modeling and artificial creativity, and basic implementations are available in most major deep learning software libraries.

    “The VAE framework is now a commonly used tool for various applications of probabilistic modeling and artificial creativity, and basic implementations are available in most major deep learning software libraries.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The ELBO is a lower bound on the marginal likelihood of the data.

    “The ELBO is a lower bound on the marginal likelihood of the data, also called the variational lower bound.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In Heess et al., 2015, re-parameterization of observed variables together with an observation model can be used to compute novel forms of policy gradients.

    “In (Heess et al., 2015) (Stochastic Value Gradients) it was shown that the re-parameterization of the observed variables, together with an observation model, can be used to compute novel forms of policy gradients.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Heess et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    In latent-variable or Bayesian models with random parameters, one needs approximate posterior estimation for which variational inference methods are suitable.

    “However, one is often more interested in flexible models with latent variables, such as deep latent-variable models, or Bayesian models with random parameters.In both cases one needs to perform approximate posterior estimation for which variational inference (VI) methods are suitable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Optimization of such models towards the maximum likelihood objective is straightforward in the fully-observed case.

    “Optimization of such models towards the maximum likelihood objective is straightforward in the fully-observed case.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In Higgins et al., 2017, strengthening the contribution of DKL(qφ(z|x)||pθ(z)) restricts information flow through latent space and was shown to improve disentanglement of latent factors.

    “In (Higgins et al., 2017) (β-VAE) it was proposed to strengthen the contribution of D KL (q φ (z|x)||p θ (z)), thus restricting the information flow through the latent space, which was shown to improve disentanglement of latent factors, further studied in (Chen et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Higgins et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Chen et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Another Bayesian approach towards optimizing the likelihood pθ(x) with DLVMs is EM with MCMC.

    “Another Bayesian approach towards optimizing the likelihood p θ (x) with DLVMs is Expectation Maximization (EM) with Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Adam and Adamax optimization methods are invariant to constant rescaling of the objective and to constant re-scalings of individual gradients.

    “Adam and Adamax optimization methods for choosing α t (Kingma and Ba, 2015); these methods are invariant to constant rescaling of the objective, and invariant to constant re-scalings of the individual gradients.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kingma and Ba, 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    As a result, L(θ, ξ) only needs to be unbiased up to proportionality.

    “As a result, L(θ, ξ) only needs to be unbiased up to proportionality.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A principal application of Bayes' rule is that it allows us to make predictions about future data x, that are optimal as long as the prior p(θ) and model class pθ(x) are correct.

    “A principal application of Bayes' rule is that it allows us to make predictions about future data x , that are optimal as long as the prior p(θ) and model class p θ (x) are correct:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    One version of MCMC which uses such posterior for relatively fast convergence is Hamiltonian MCMC.

    “One version of MCMC which uses such posterior for relatively fast convergence, is Hamiltonian MCMC (Neal, 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Neal, 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    From a Bayesian perspective, we can improve upon the maximum likelihood objective through maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation, which maximizes the log-posterior w.r.t.θ.

    “From a Bayesian perspective, we can improve upon the maximum likelihood objective through maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation, which maximizes the log-posterior w.r.t.θ.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Expectation Maximization (EM) is a general strategy for learning parameters in partially observed models.

    “Expectation Maximization (EM) is a general strategy for learning parameters in partially observed models (Dempster et al., 1977).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dempster et al., 1977

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    A disadvantage of MCMC is the requirement for running an independent MCMC chain per datapoint.

    “A disadvantage of this approach is the requirement for running an independent MCMC chain per datapoint.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The tightness of this bound is defined by DKL(qφ(z|x)||pθ(z|x)).

    “The tightness of this bound is defined by D KL (q φ (z|x)||p θ (z|x)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Sharing directionality of inference (top-down) allows straightforward sharing of parameters between the generative model and the inference model.

    “Sharing directionality of inference, as in (b), has the benefit that it allows for straightforward sharing of parameters between the generative model and the inference model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Due to the remarkable efficiency of reverse-mode automatic differentiation, the value and gradient of differentiable scalar objectives can be computed with equal time complexity.

    “Due to the remarkable efficiency of reverse-mode automatic differentiation (also known as the backpropagation algorithm (Rumelhart et al., 1988)), the value and gradient (i.e. the vector of partial derivatives) of differentiable scalar objectives can be computed with equal time complexity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rumelhart et al., 1988

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Posterior gradients in DLVMs are relatively affordable to compute by differentiating the log-joint distribution w.r.t.z.

    “Note that posterior gradients in DLVMs are relatively affordable to compute by differentiating the log-joint distribution w.r.t.z:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    We work with directed models where the objective per datapoint is scalar, and due to the differentiability of neural networks that compose them, the objective is differentiable w.r.t. its parameters θ.

    “We work with directed models where the objective per datapoint is scalar, and due to the differentiability of neural networks that compose them, the objective is differentiable w.r.t.its parameters θ.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Early stopping criterion is to stop optimization as soon as the probability of a holdout set of data starts decreasing.

    “A simple but effective criterion is to stop optimization as soon as the probability of a holdout set of data starts decreasing; this criterion is called early stopping.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Optimization of the generative model changes both pθ(zi|Pa(zi)) and pθ(x|zi, Pa(zi)).

    “Optimization of the generative model changes both p θ (z i |P a(z i )) and p θ (x|z i , P a(z i )).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The prior p(θ) in equation (A.5) has diminishing effect for increasingly large N.

    “The prior p(θ) in equation (A.5) has diminishing effect for increasingly large N .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    VAEs employ a strategy with global variational parameters.

    “In contrast, VAEs employ a strategy with global variational parameters.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    In case of MCMC, the posterior is approximated by a mixture of a set of approximately i.i.d. samples from the posterior, acquired by running a Markov chain.

    “In case of MCMC, the posterior is approximated by a mixture of a set of approximately i.i.d.samples from the posterior, acquired by running a Markov chain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
103 of 103
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The observed variable x is a random sample from an unknown underlying process, whose true distribution p*(x) is unknown.

    “We assume the observed variable x is a random sample from an unknown underlying process, whose true (probability) distribution p * (x) is unknown.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The datapoints in dataset D are independent samples from an unchanging underlying distribution.

    “The datapoints are assumed to be independent samples from an unchanging underlying distribution.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The distribution of the noise random variable ε is independent of x or φ.

    “where the distribution of random variable is independent of x or φ.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The transformation g(.) is invertible.

    “As long as g(.) is an invertible function, the densities of and z are related as:”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Latent variable models with multiple layers of stochastic variables are often equivalent to auxiliary-variable methods.

    “Latent variable models with multiple layers of stochastic variables, such as the one used in our experiments, are often equivalent to such auxiliary-variable methods.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    When the number of labeled examples is low, purely supervised approaches tend to exhibit poor generalization to new data.

    “When the number of labeled examples is low, solutions found with purely supervised approaches tend to exhibit poor generalization to new data.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Existing methods for posterior inference were either relatively inefficient or not applicable to models with neural networks as components.

    “Existing methods for such posterior inference were either relatively inefficient, or not applicable to models with neural networks as components.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In case of i.i.d. data, traditional variational EM methods estimate local variational parameters φ(i), i.e. a separate set of variational parameters per datapoint i in the dataset.

    “In case of of i.i.d.data, traditional variational EM methods estimate local variational parameters φ (i) , i.e. a separate set of variational parameters per datapoint i in the dataset.”
8 of 8

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • VAEs are inherently probabilistic, making them well-suited for tasks that require uncertainty quantification.

    “VAEs are inherently probabilistic, making them well-suited for tasks that require uncertainty quantification.”
  • There is a lack of critical perspectives within the theoretical framework investigating the speculative relation between human creatives, generative AI agents, and other potential social stakeholders.

    “Thus, going beyond commercial application, there's still a lack of critical perspectives within the theoretical framework which investigate the speculative relation between human creatives, generative AI agents, and other potential social stakeholders [39,76].”

    From Exploring Designers’ Perceptions and Practices of Collaborating with Generative AI as a Co-creative Agent in a Multi-stakeholder Design Process: Take the Domain of Avatar Design as an Example (2023) · cites this paper as [39]

    Section 4.5.2 discusses artificial creativity as an application of generative models, but does not assess critical perspectives on relationships among human creatives, AI agents, and social stakeholders. Searches for those relationships and for the claimed theoretical gap found no passage addressing them. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Variational Autoencoders aim to learn both an encoder and a decoder to map input data to values in a continuous latent space.

    “Variational Autoencoders [61,123,194] aim to learn both an encoder and a decoder to map input data to values in a continuous latent space.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Dataset log-likelihood is both a sum and an average

    Minor

    Equation (1.10) defines log p θ (D) as the sum of datapoint log-probabilities. Equation (2.58) uses the same quantity for the average, differing by a factor of the dataset size.

  • Auxiliary-variable ELBO has the wrong KL sign

    Minor

    Equation (3.4) equates the expected ELBO to a KL divergence in (3.5). The paper's earlier joint-distribution identity instead makes a KL divergence equal to the negative ELBO plus a constant.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

14 of the 171 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 102

  1. Banerjee, 2007, :mProceedings of the 2007 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, 204
  2. Bayer, 2014, :mNIPS 2014 Workshop on Advances in Variational Inference
  3. Bengio, 2014, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 226
  4. Berg, 2017, :mConference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intel ligence
  5. Blei, 2012, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 1367
  6. Blundell, 2015, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 1613
  7. Bornschein, 2016, :mProceedings of the 33rd International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning, 2511
  8. Bowman, 2015, :marXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06349 · arXiv
  9. Brock, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Learning Representations
  10. Chen, 2018, :mProceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2615
  11. Chen, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Learning Representations
  12. Chung, 2015, :mAdvances in neural information processing systems, 2980
  13. Cremer, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Learning Representations
  14. Deco, 1995, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 247
  15. Dempster, 1977, :mJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 1
  16. Deshpande, 2017, :mProceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 6837
  17. Dinh, 2016, :marXiv preprint arXiv:1605.08803 · arXiv
  18. Dosovitskiy, 2015, :mProceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1538
  19. Dumoulin, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Learning Representations
  20. Edwards, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Learning Representations
  21. Eslami, 2016, :mAdvances In Neural Information Processing Systems, 3225
  22. Fan, 2015, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 1387
  23. Fraccaro, 2016, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2199
  24. Gal, 2016, :mAdvances in neural information processing systems, 1019
  25. Germain, 2015, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 881
  26. Gershman, 2014, :mCogSci
  27. Gomez-Bombarelli, 2018, :mACS central science, 268
  28. Goodfellow, 2014, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2672
  29. Graves, 2011, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2348
  30. Gregor, 2016, :mAdvances In Neural Information Processing Systems, 3549
  31. Gregor, 2015, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 1462
  32. Gregor, 2014, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 1242
  33. Grover, 2018, :mAAAI Conference on Artificial Intel ligence
  34. Gulrajani, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Learning Representations
  35. He, 2015, :mProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 1026
  36. He, 2016, :mProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 770
  37. Heess, 2015, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2944
  38. Hernandez-Lobato, 2016, “Black-box:madivergence minimization”
  39. Higgins, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Learning Representations
  40. Hinton, 1995, :mScience, 1158
  41. Hoffman, 2016, :mWorkshop in Advances in Approximate Bayesian Inference, NIPS
  42. Houthooft, 2016, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 1109
  43. Hsu, 2016, :mSignal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA), 2016 Asia-Pacific, 1
  44. Hu, 2017, arXiv:1703.00955 · arXiv
  45. Huang, 2018, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 2083
  46. Jang, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Learning Representations
  47. Johnson, 2016, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2946
  48. Jozefowicz, 2015, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 2342
  49. Karl, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Learning Representations
  50. Kavukcuoglu, 2008, :mTech. rep.No. CBLL-TR-2008-12-01
  51. Kingma, 2014, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 3581
  52. Kingma, 2016, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 4743
  53. Kingma, 2015, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2575
  54. Kingma, 2014, :mInternational Conference on Learning Representations
  55. Kingma, 2015, :mInternational Conference on Learning Representations
  56. Krishnan, 2017, :MAAAI, 2101
  57. Kulkarni, 2015, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2539
  58. Kusner, 2017, :mProceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 70, 1945
  59. Larsen, 2016, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 1558
  60. Lazaro-Gredilla, 2014, International Conference on Machine Learning
  61. Li, 2016, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 1073
  62. Li, 2015, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 1718
  63. Louizos, 2017, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 3288
  64. Louizos, 2016, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 1708
  65. Louizos, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 2218
  66. Maal0e, 2016, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning
  67. Maddison, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Learning Representations
  68. Miao, 2016, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 1727
  69. Mnih, 2014, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning
  70. Mnih, 2016, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 2188
  71. Mohamed, 2015, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2125
  72. Molchanov, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 2498
  73. Naesseth, 2017, :mArtificial Intel ligence and Statistics, 489
  74. Paisley, 2012, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 1367
  75. Papamakarios, 2017, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2335
  76. Pritzel, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 2827
  77. Pu, 2016, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2352
  78. Ranganath, 2014, :mInternational Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 814
  79. Ranganath, 2016, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 324
  80. Ravanbakhsh, 2017, :mAAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  81. Rezende, 2016, :mInternational Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning, 1521
  82. Rezende, 2014, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 1278
  83. Rezende, 2016, :mAdvances In Neural Information Processing Systems, 4997
  84. Rezende, 2015, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 1530
  85. Roeder, 2017, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 6925
  86. Roweis, 1998, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 626
  87. Ruiz, 2016, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 460
  88. Salakhutdinov, 2010, :mInternational Conference on Artificial Intel ligence and Statistics, 693
  89. Serban, 2017, :mProceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intel ligence
  90. Sohl-Dickstein, 2015, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 2256
  91. S0nderby, 2016, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning
  92. S0nderby, 2016, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 3738
  93. Szegedy, 2015, :mProceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1
  94. Tomczak, :mBenelearn 2017: Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Benelux Conference on Machine Learning, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 9-10 June 2017, 162
  95. Tran, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Learning Representations
  96. Van den Oord, 2016, :mAdvances in neural information processing systems, 4790
  97. Van Oord, 2016, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 1747
  98. Watter, 2015, :mAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2746
  99. White, 2016, arXiv:1609.04468 · arXiv
  100. Xu, 2017, :MAAAI, 3358
  101. Yan, 2016, :mEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, 776
  102. Yang, 2017, :mInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 3881

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M.
Affiliations
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • Qualcomm (United States) (US)
Venue
Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2019-11-28
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
307-392
ISSN
  • 1935-8237 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-8245
OpenAlex
W2948978827
Cited by
2,609
References
171
Citations by year
2026: 390 · 2025: 599 · 2024: 597 · 2023: 434 · 2022: 276 · 2021: 223 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 3
FWCI
67.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
variational autoencoder, latent variable models, variational inference, deep generative models, probabilistic inference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review