Cited by 6Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyFossil Insects in AmberEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Reinterpretation of purported molting evidence in the Thermopolis Archaeopteryx

Open access
Kiat, Yosef, Pyle, Peter, Balaban, Amir, O’Connor, Jingmai K.·2021·Communications Biology

Abstract

Feather molt is an important process in the avian annual cycle that is affected by several variables, including flight ability, migration strategy, habitat preference, and morphology 1 , 2 . Understanding molt strategies in feathered non-avian dinosaurs and stem birds has the potential to expand our knowledge of the ecology and flight ability of these extinct species and shed light on the evolution of this important process in birds. Kaye et al. 3 described purported feather sheaths in the Thermopolis Archaeopteryx (WDC-CSG-100 4 ) using laser-stimulated fluorescence to amplify what is visible under normal light and ultraviolet-induced fluorescence 4 . They suggested this finding may support a bidirectional sequential molt with inward and outward renewal of the primary feathers from a single center (node), a pattern that rarely occurs in Neoaves (crown birds). Kaye et al. claim this discovery represents the earliest record of sequential molting in a pennaraptoran (150 million years old), and the first record of molt in an avialan 3 .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42003-021-02349-x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The remiges of Archaeopteryx would have molted sequentially.

    “However, comparison with volant paravians Microraptor and Confuciusornis strongly suggests the remiges would have molted sequentially [110, 111] whereas the non-volant Anchiornis exhibits an irregular molt [4].”

    From The ecology of Archaeopteryx (2026) · cites this paper as [110]

    The paper says the Thermopolis Archaeopteryx specimen cannot distinguish sequential from non-sequential molt and that its feather ages and molt sequence are undeterminable. It also considers the purported feather sheaths equivocal (main text). Although it reports sequential molt in Microraptor, it does not infer that Archaeopteryx’s remiges would have molted sequentially. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [1]Kiat Y Izhaki I Sapir N Determinants of wing-feather moult speed in songbirds Evol. Ecol. 2016 30 783 795 10.1007/s10682-016-9838-3 · DOI
  2. [2]Kiat Y Sequential molt in a feathered dinosaur and implications for early paravian ecology and locomotion Curr. Biol. 2020 30 3633 3638 10.1016/j.cub.2020.06.046 32679101 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Kaye TG Pittman M Wahl WR Archaeopteryx feather sheaths reveal sequential center-out flight-related molting strategy Commun. Biol. 2020 3 1 5 10.1038/s42003-020-01467-2 33293660 PMC7722847 · DOI
  4. [5]Kiat Y Divergent primary moult—A rare moult sequence among Western Palaearctic passerines PLoS ONE 2017 12 e0187282 10.1371/journal.pone.0187282 29088288 PMC5663452 · DOI
  5. [6]Pyle P Evolutionary implications of synapomorphic wing-molt sequences among falcons (Falconiformes) and parrots (Psittaciformes) Condor 2013 115 593 602 10.1525/cond.2013.120173 · DOI
  6. [7]Savile DBO The primaries of Archaeopteryx Auk 1957 74 99 101 10.2307/4082039 · DOI
  7. [9]O’Connor JK New information on the plumage of Protopteryx (Aves: Enantiornithes) from a new specimen Cretac. Res. 2020 116 104577 10.1016/j.cretres.2020.104577 · DOI
  8. [11]Navalón G Marugán-Lobón J Chiappe LM Sanz JL Buscalioni ÁD Soft-tissue and dermal arrangement in the wing of an Early Cretaceous bird: implications for the evolution of avian flight Sci. Rep. 2015 5 14864 10.1038/srep14864 26440221 PMC4594305 · DOI
  9. [12]Zheng X Exceptional preservation of soft tissue in a new specimen of Eoconfuciusornis and its biological implications Natl. Sci. Rev. 2017 4 441 452 10.1093/nsr/nwx004 · DOI
  10. [14]Alibardi L Keratinization of sheath and calamus cells in developing and regenerating feathers Ann. Anat. 2007 189 583 595 10.1016/j.aanat.2007.06.001 18078002 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kiat, Y., Pyle, P., Balaban, A., & O’Connor, J. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Haifa (IL)
  • The Institute for Bird Populations (US)
Corresponding author
Kiat, Yosef
Venue
Communications Biology
Published
2021-07-05
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
837-837
ISSN
2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3179925842
Cited by
6
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fossil Insects in Amber
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
Archaeopteryx, feather molt, primary feathers, flight evolution, UV fluorescence
MeSH terms
Animals, Fossils, Molting, Dinosaurs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review