CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 239

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Topological photonic crystal nanocavity laser

Ota, Yasutomo, Katsumi, Ryota, Watanabe, Katsuyuki, Iwamoto, Satoshi, Arakawa, Yasuhiko·2018·Communications Physics
DOI 10.1038/s42005-018-0083-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Topological edge states exist at the interfaces between two topologically distinct materials. The presence and number of such modes are deterministically predicted from the bulk band topologies, known as the bulk-edge correspondence. This principle is highly useful for predictably controlling optical modes in resonators made of photonic crystals (PhCs), leading to the recent demonstrations of microscale topological lasers. Meanwhile, zero-dimensional topological trapped states in the nanoscale remained unexplored, despite its importance for enhancing light–matter interactions and for wide applications including single-mode nanolasers. Here, we report a topological PhC nanocavity with a near-diffraction-limited mode volume and its application to single-mode lasing. The topological origin of the nanocavity, formed at the interface between two topologically distinct PhCs, guarantees the existence of only one mode within its photonic bandgap. The observed lasing accompanies a high spontaneous emission coupling factor stemming from the nanoscale confinement. These results encompass a way to greatly downscale topological photonics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42005-018-0083-7

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Topological nanocavity design concept. (a) Schematic of the nanocavity formed by interfacing two PhCs with a common bandgap and distinct Zak phases. The Zak phases denoted in the bracket are respectively for the lowest (left) and the second lowest (right) band. (b) Detailed description of the design. The two PhCs are in essence the same but differ in the way to define the unit cells. Blue unit cell arranges the small air hole with a width of d 1 at the center, while red unit cell has the large air hole with d 2 at the center. The centers of the two holes respectively correspond to the inversion centers of the double periodic PhC. The sum of d 1 and d 2 equals to 0.5 a . (c) Band structures and wavefunctions at the band edges calculated for the PhC with the blue (left) and red (right) unit cell. The color of the band curve expresses its Zak phase (blue = π , red =0). A band inversion occurs when swapping the unit cells. The center panel shows the case for d 1 = d 2 = 0.25 a , exhibiting a Dirac point at the band edge.
Figure 1 Topological nanocavity design concept. (a) Schematic of the nanocavity formed by interfacing two PhCs with a common bandgap and distinct Zak phases. The Zak phases denoted in the bracket are respectively for the lowest (left) and the second lowest (right) band. (b) Detailed description of the design. The two PhCs are in essence the same but differ in the way to define the unit cells. Blue unit cell arranges the small air hole with a width of d 1 at the center, while red unit cell has the large air hole with d 2 at the center. The centers of the two holes respectively correspond to the inversion centers of the double periodic PhC. The sum of d 1 and d 2 equals to 0.5 a . (c) Band structures and wavefunctions at the band edges calculated for the PhC with the blue (left) and red (right) unit cell. The color of the band curve expresses its Zak phase (blue = π , red =0). A band inversion occurs when swapping the unit cells. The center panel shows the case for d 1 = d 2 = 0.25 a , exhibiting a Dirac point at the band edge.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 Numerical simulation results. (a) Calculated electric ( Ey ) field profiles for the nanocavities with different d 1s. A large modification in the mode extents as d 1 increases can be clearly seen. f denotes the normalized frequency of the confined mode. (b) Simulated normalized frequencies (red) and mode volumes (black) plotted as a function of d 1. The resonant frequencies are bound closely to the Dirac point, while the mode volumes vary largely as the PhC bandgap narrows by increasing d 1. (c) Computed Q factors, showing a peak value of ~ 60,000 at d 1=0.19 a . The quick decay of Q factor for d 1 > 0.19 a originates from the photon leakage from the finite-size simulation region, while the reduction for d 1 < 0.19 a is due to the light leakage into free space due to the tighter optical confinement.
Figure 2 Numerical simulation results. (a) Calculated electric ( Ey ) field profiles for the nanocavities with different d 1s. A large modification in the mode extents as d 1 increases can be clearly seen. f denotes the normalized frequency of the confined mode. (b) Simulated normalized frequencies (red) and mode volumes (black) plotted as a function of d 1. The resonant frequencies are bound closely to the Dirac point, while the mode volumes vary largely as the PhC bandgap narrows by increasing d 1. (c) Computed Q factors, showing a peak value of ~ 60,000 at d 1=0.19 a . The quick decay of Q factor for d 1 > 0.19 a originates from the photon leakage from the finite-size simulation region, while the reduction for d 1 < 0.19 a is due to the light leakage into free space due to the tighter optical confinement.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 3 Basic experimental characterization of the topological nanocavities. (a) Scanning electron microscope image of a fabricated nanocavity with d 1 = 0.19 a . (b) Measured PL spectra for the fabricated PhC nanobeams with different d 1 s. The colored curves are of topologically-nontrivial interfaces, while the black curves are of regular PhCs. Arrows indicate the spectral peak positions of the topological 0D edge modes (colored) and of the band edges (gray). The right panels show the close up spectra of the topological edge states. The black curves overlaid on the graphs are fitting. (c) Summary of the measured peak positions plotted as a function of d 1. The magenta data points are of the 0D confined modes, while the brown (dark green) data points are of the higher (lower) energy band edges. The error bar for each point expresses the standard deviation deduced from the measurement on ten samples with the same design. The solid lines show simulated peak positions by the three dimensional plane wave expansion method. The simulated curves are plotted with a constant offset for better comparison with the experimental results. (d) Position dependent PL intensities measured for the topological nanocavities with different d 1s. Tighter mode localization for smaller d 1, as expected from the numerical modeling, is demonstrated.
Figure 3 Basic experimental characterization of the topological nanocavities. (a) Scanning electron microscope image of a fabricated nanocavity with d 1 = 0.19 a . (b) Measured PL spectra for the fabricated PhC nanobeams with different d 1 s. The colored curves are of topologically-nontrivial interfaces, while the black curves are of regular PhCs. Arrows indicate the spectral peak positions of the topological 0D edge modes (colored) and of the band edges (gray). The right panels show the close up spectra of the topological edge states. The black curves overlaid on the graphs are fitting. (c) Summary of the measured peak positions plotted as a function of d 1. The magenta data points are of the 0D confined modes, while the brown (dark green) data points are of the higher (lower) energy band edges. The error bar for each point expresses the standard deviation deduced from the measurement on ten samples with the same design. The solid lines show simulated peak positions by the three dimensional plane wave expansion method. The simulated curves are plotted with a constant offset for better comparison with the experimental results. (d) Position dependent PL intensities measured for the topological nanocavities with different d 1s. Tighter mode localization for smaller d 1, as expected from the numerical modeling, is demonstrated.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 4 Laser oscillation from the topological nanocavity designed with d 1 = 0.19 a . (a) PL spectra measured with two different peak pump powers. For the low pumping power of 5 μ W, broad background emission from the QDs, spanning from ~ 900 nm to 1200 nm, dominates the spectrum. For the higher pumping power, the background is suppressed and the cavity emission peak in turn prevails. (b) Light-in-light-out plot for the emission peak of the 0D edge state. The black solid line is the fitting to the data points. Laser transition with a threshold peak pump power of 46 μ W is seen. (c) Logarithmic plots of the LL curve (red) and of the evolution of the intensities of the background emission (light green). The LL curve exhibits a mild S-shaped curve, which is typical for highβ lasers. The vertical dashed line indicates the threshold pump power. The background emission clamps above the laser threshold. The diagonal dashed line is an eye guide with a linear increase. The scattered data points above the threshold originate from the noisy PL spectra for the QD emission, due to strong cavity emission and the limited dynamic range of our detector. (d) Measured evolution of cavity linewidths as a function of peak pump power. The linewidths were extracted by fitting to the high resolution spectra with Lorentzian peak functions convolved with a Gaussian function representing the spectrometer response (~40 μ eV). Linewidths shows a significant narrowing of nearly an order of magnitude. The increase of the linewidth above the lasing threshold is likely due to heating in the nanocavity.
Figure 4 Laser oscillation from the topological nanocavity designed with d 1 = 0.19 a . (a) PL spectra measured with two different peak pump powers. For the low pumping power of 5 μ W, broad background emission from the QDs, spanning from ~ 900 nm to 1200 nm, dominates the spectrum. For the higher pumping power, the background is suppressed and the cavity emission peak in turn prevails. (b) Light-in-light-out plot for the emission peak of the 0D edge state. The black solid line is the fitting to the data points. Laser transition with a threshold peak pump power of 46 μ W is seen. (c) Logarithmic plots of the LL curve (red) and of the evolution of the intensities of the background emission (light green). The LL curve exhibits a mild S-shaped curve, which is typical for highβ lasers. The vertical dashed line indicates the threshold pump power. The background emission clamps above the laser threshold. The diagonal dashed line is an eye guide with a linear increase. The scattered data points above the threshold originate from the noisy PL spectra for the QD emission, due to strong cavity emission and the limited dynamic range of our detector. (d) Measured evolution of cavity linewidths as a function of peak pump power. The linewidths were extracted by fitting to the high resolution spectra with Lorentzian peak functions convolved with a Gaussian function representing the spectrometer response (~40 μ eV). Linewidths shows a significant narrowing of nearly an order of magnitude. The increase of the linewidth above the lasing threshold is likely due to heating in the nanocavity.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure S1 Unit cells under consideration
Figure S1 Unit cells under considerationCC-BY · From the PDF
Figure S2 Existence and absence of topological interface states at the interfaces between several different combinations of 1D PhC nanobeams
Figure S2 Existence and absence of topological interface states at the interfaces between several different combinations of 1D PhC nanobeamsCC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Hatsugai, Y. Chern number and edge states in the integer quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3697–3700 (1993). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Su, W. P., Schrieffer, J. R. & Heeger, A. J. Solitons in polyacetylene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1698–1701 (1979). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Gao, W. S., Xiao, M., Chan, C. T. & Tam, W. Y. Determination of Zak phase by reflection phase in 1D photonic crystals. Opt. Lett. 40, 5259 (2015). · DOI
  4. St-Jean, P. et al. Lasing in topological edge states of a one-dimensional lattice. Nat. Photonics 11, 651–656 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Zhao, H. et al. Topological hybrid silicon microlasers. Nat. Commun. 9, 981 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Parto, M. et al. Edge-mode lasing in 1D topological active arrays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 113901 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Poli, C., Bellec, M., Kuhl, U., Mortessagne, F. & Schomerus, H. Selective enhancement of topologically induced interface states in a dielectric resonator chain. Nat. Commun. 6, 6710 (2015). · DOI
  8. Slobozhanyuk, A. P., Poddubny, A. N., Miroshnichenko, A. E., Belov, P. A. & Kivshar, Y. S. Subwavelength topological edge states in optically resonant dielectric structures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 123901 (2015). · DOI
  9. Xiao, M. et al. Geometric phase and band inversion in periodic acoustic systems. Nat. Phys. 11, 240–244 (2015). · DOI
  10. Xiao, Y.-X., Ma, G., Zhang, Z.-Q. & Chan, C. T. Topological subspace-induced bound state in the continuum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 166803 (2017). · DOI
  11. Kim, I., Iwamoto, S. & Arakawa, Y. Topologically protected elastic waves in one-dimensional phononic crystals of continuous media. Appl. Phys. Express 11, 017201 (2018). · DOI
  12. Haldane, F. D. M. & Raghu, S. Possible realization of directional optical waveguides in photonic crystals with broken time-reversal symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 013904 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Lu, L., Joannopoulos, J. D. & Soljačić, M. Topological photonics. Nat. Photonics 8, 821–829 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  14. Asano, T., Ochi, Y., Takahashi, Y., Kishimoto, K. & Noda, S. Photonic crystal nanocavity with a Q factor exceeding eleven million. Opt. Express 25, 1769 (2017). · DOI
  15. Hu, S. et al. Experimental realization of deep subwavelength confinement in dielectric optical resonators. arXiv 1707, 04672 (2017).
  16. Deotare, P. B., McCutcheon, M. W., Frank, I. W., Khan, M. & Lončar, M. High quality factor photonic crystal nanobeam cavities. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 121106 (2009). · DOI
  17. Oulton, R. F. et al. Plasmon lasers at deep subwavelength scale. Nature 461, 629–632 (2009). · DOI
  18. Bahari, B. et al. Nonreciprocal lasing in topological cavities of arbitrary geometries. Science 358, 636–640 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  19. Bandres, M. A. et al. Topological insulator laser: experiments. Science 359, eaar4005 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  20. Zak, J. Berrys phase for energy bands in solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2747–2750 (1989). · DOI · Paper page
  21. Khajavikhan, M. et al. Thresholdless nanoscale coaxial lasers. Nature 482, 204–207 (2012). · DOI
  22. Ota, Y., Kakuda, M., Watanabe, K., Iwamoto, S. & Arakawa, Y. Thresholdless quantum dot nanolaser. Opt. Express 25, 19981 (2017). · DOI
  23. Takiguchi, M. et al. Systematic study of thresholdless oscillation in high-β buried multiple-quantum-well photonic crystal nanocavity lasers. Opt. Express 24, 3441 (2016). · DOI
  24. Zhang, Y. et al. Photonic crystal nanobeam lasers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 051104 (2010). · DOI
  25. Xiao, M., Zhang, Z. Q. & Chan, C. T. Surface impedance and bulk band geometric phases in one-dimensional systems. Phys. Rev. X 4, 021017 (2014).
  26. Zak, J. Symmetry criterion for surface states in solids. Phys. Rev. B 32, 2218–2226 (1985). · DOI
  27. Kalozoumis, P. A. et al. Finite size effects on topological interface states in one-dimensional scattering systems. arXiv 1712, 08763 (2017).
  28. Lalouat, L. et al. Subwavelength imaging of light confinement in high-Q/small-V photonic crystal nanocavity. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 111111 (2008). · DOI
  29. Bjork, G. & Yamamoto, Y. Analysis of semiconductor microcavity lasers using rate equations. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 27, 2386–2396 (1991). · DOI
  30. Notomi, M. & Taniyama, H. On-demand ultrahigh-Q cavity formation and photon pinning via dynamic waveguide tuning. Opt. Express 16, 18657 (2008). · DOI
  31. Schomerus, H. Topologically protected midgap states in complex photonic lattices. Opt. Lett. 38, 1912 (2013). · DOI
  32. Malzard, S., Poli, C. & Schomerus, H. Topologically protected defect states in open photonic systems with non-hermitian charge-conjugation and parity-time symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 200402 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  33. Leykam, D., Bliokh, K. Y., Huang, C., Chong, Y. D. & Nori, F. Edge modes, degeneracies, and topological numbers in non-Hermitian systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 28–30 (2017). · DOI
  34. Harari, G. et al. Topological insulator laser: theory. Science 359, eaar4003 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  35. Malzard, S. & Schomerus, H. Nonlinear mode competition and symmetry-protected power oscillations in topological lasers. New J. Phys. 20, 063044 (2018). · DOI
  36. Longhi, S., Kominis, Y. & Kovanis, V. Presence of temporal dynamical instabilities in topological insulator lasers. Europhys. Lett. 122, 14004 (2018). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ota, Y., Katsumi, R., Watanabe, K., Iwamoto, S., & Arakawa, Y.
Venue
Communications Physics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2018-11-22
Volume
1
Issue
1
ISSN
2399-3650
DOI
10.1038/s42005-018-0083-7
Cited by
239
References
4
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review