The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reconstructing quantum states with generative models
Open accessAbstract
A major bottleneck in the development of scalable many-body quantum technologies is the difficulty in benchmarking state preparations, which suffer from an exponential ‘curse of dimensionality’ inherent to the classical description of quantum states. We present an experimentally friendly method for density matrix reconstruction based on neural network generative models. The learning procedure comes with a built-in approximate certificate of the reconstruction and makes no assumptions about the purity of the state under scrutiny. It can efficiently handle a broad class of complex systems including prototypical states in quantum information, as well as ground states of local spin models common to condensed matter physics. The key insight is to reduce state tomography to an unsupervised learning problem of the statistics of an informationally complete quantum measurement. This constitutes a modern machine learning approach to the validation of complex quantum devices, which may in addition prove relevant as a neural-network ansatz over mixed states suitable for variational optimization. Present day quantum technologies enable computations with tens and soon hundreds of qubits. A major outstanding challenge is to measure and benchmark the complete quantum state, a task that grows exponentially with the system size. Generative models based on restricted Boltzmann machines and recurrent neural networks can be employed to solve this quantum tomography problem in a scalable manner.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks
Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O., & Le, Q. V. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.3215 · Cited by 17,766
Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modeling
Chung, J., Gulcehre, C., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.3555 · Cited by 11,008
Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond
Preskill, J. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 · Cited by 8,830
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition
Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511976667 · Cited by 8,436
On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder–Decoder Approaches
Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Bahdanau, D., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of SSST-8, Eighth Workshop on Syntax, Semantics and Structure in Statistical Translation · doi:10.3115/v1/w14-4012 · Cited by 7,099
Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translation
Wu, Y., Schuster, M., Chen, Z., Le, Q. V., Norouzi, M., Macherey, W., Krikun, M., Cao, Y., Gao, Q., Macherey, K., et al. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.08144 · Cited by 5,319
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition
Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2011) · Cited by 2,724
Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods
Peres, A., & Ballentine, L. E. (1995) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.17946 · Cited by 2,561
Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator
Bernien, H., Schwartz, S., Keesling, A., Levine, H., Omran, A., Pichler, H., Choi, S., Zibrov, A. S., Endres, M., Greiner, M., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24622 · Cited by 2,460
Cited by
Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements
Huang, H.-Y., Kueng, R., & Preskill, J. (2020) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0932-7 · Cited by 1,240
Discovering Physical Concepts with Neural Networks
Iten, R., Metger, T., Wilming, H., del Rio, L., & Renner, R. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.010508 · Cited by 458
Polino, E., Valeri, M., Spagnolo, N., & Sciarrino, F. (2020) · AVS Quantum Science · doi:10.1116/5.0007577 · Cited by 414
Recurrent neural network wave functions
Hibat-Allah, M., Ganahl, M., Hayward, L. E., Melko, R. G., & Carrasquilla, J. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.023358 · Cited by 274
Self-citationToward an artificial intelligence physicist for unsupervised learning
Wu, T., & Tegmark, M. (2019) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.100.033311 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Carrasquilla, J., Torlai, G., Melko, R. G., & Aolita, L.
- Venue
- Nature Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2019-03-11
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 155-161
- ISSN
- 2522-5839 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2898121159
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 19.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reconstructing quantum states with generative models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s42256-019-0028-1
- The paper
- Carrasquilla, J., Torlai, G., Melko, R. G., & Aolita, L. (2019). Reconstructing quantum states with generative models. Nature Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0028-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.