The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enabling the future of colonoscopy with intelligent and autonomous magnetic manipulation
Open accessAbstract
Early diagnosis of colorectal cancer substantially improves survival. However, over half of cases are diagnosed late due to the demand for colonoscopy—the ‘gold standard’ for screening—exceeding capacity. Colonoscopy is limited by the outdated design of conventional endoscopes, which are associated with high complexity of use, cost and pain. Magnetic endoscopes are a promising alternative and overcome the drawbacks of pain and cost, but they struggle to reach the translational stage as magnetic manipulation is complex and unintuitive. In this work, we use machine vision to develop intelligent and autonomous control of a magnetic endoscope, enabling non-expert users to effectively perform magnetic colonoscopy in vivo. We combine the use of robotics, computer vision and advanced control to offer an intuitive and effective endoscopic system. Moreover, we define the characteristics required to achieve autonomy in robotic endoscopy. The paradigm described here can be adopted in a variety of applications where navigation in unstructured environments is required, such as catheters, pancreatic endoscopy, bronchoscopy and gastroscopy. This work brings alternative endoscopic technologies closer to the translational stage, increasing the availability of early-stage cancer treatments. Magnetic endoscopes have the potential to improve access, reduce patient discomfort and enhance safety. While navigation of magnetic endoscopes can be challenging for the operator, a new approach by Martin, Scaglioni and colleagues explores how to reduce this burden by offering different levels of autonomy in robotic colonoscopy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Siegel, R. L., Torre, L. A., & Jemal, A. (2018) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21492 · Cited by 84,109
Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research
(1988) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62386-9 · Cited by 15,003
Cited by
Magnetic Soft Materials and Robots
Kim, Y., & Zhao, X. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00481 · Cited by 873
Telerobotic neurovascular interventions with magnetic manipulation
Kim, Y., Genevriere, E., Harker, P., Choe, J., Balicki, M., Regenhardt, R. W., Vranic, J. E., Dmytriw, A. A., Patel, A. B., & Zhao, X. (2022) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.abg9907 · Cited by 422
Autonomous robotic laparoscopic surgery for intestinal anastomosis
Saeidi, H., Opfermann, J. D., Kam, M., Wei, S., Leonard, S., Hsieh, M. H., Kang, J. U., & Krieger, A. (2022) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.abj2908 · Cited by 384
Dexterous helical magnetic robot for improved endovascular access
Dreyfus, R., Boehler, Q., Lyttle, S., Gruber, P., Lussi, J., Chautems, C., Gervasoni, S., Berberat, J., Seibold, D., Ochsenbein-Kölble, N., et al. (2024) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.adh0298 · Cited by 185
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, J. W., Scaglioni, B., Norton, J. C., Subramanian, V., Arezzo, A., Obstein, K. L., & Valdastri, P.
- Venue
- Nature Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2020-10-12
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 595-606
- ISSN
- 2522-5839 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3093713122
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enabling the future of colonoscopy with intelligent and autonomous magnetic manipulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s42256-020-00231-9
- The paper
- Martin, J. W., Scaglioni, B., Norton, J. C., Subramanian, V., Arezzo, A., Obstein, K. L., & Valdastri, P. (2020). Enabling the future of colonoscopy with intelligent and autonomous magnetic manipulation. Nature Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-00231-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.