The DOI matches its Crossref record; 130 of the 130 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Blue carbon as a natural climate solution
Open accessAbstract
Blue carbon ecosystems (BCEs), including mangrove forests, seagrass meadows and tidal marshes, store carbon and provide co-benefits such as coastal protection and fisheries enhancement. Blue carbon sequestration has therefore been suggested as a natural climate solution. In this Review, we examine the potential for BCEs to act as carbon sinks and the opportunities to protect or restore ecosystems for this function. Globally, BCEs are calculated to store >30,000 Tg C across ~185 million ha, with their conservation potentially avoiding emissions of 304 (141–466) Tg carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) per year. Potential BCE restoration has been estimated in the range of 0.2–3.2 million ha for tidal marshes, 8.3–25.4 million ha for seagrasses and 9–13 million ha for mangroves, which could draw down an additional 841 (621–1,064) Tg CO2e per year by 2030, collectively amounting to ~3% of global emissions (based on 2019 and 2020 global annual fossil fuel emissions). Mangrove protection and/or restoration could provide the greatest carbon-related benefits, but better understanding of other BCEs is needed. BCE destruction is unlikely to stop fully, and not all losses can be restored. However, engineering and planning for coastal protection offer opportunities for protection and restoration, especially through valuing co-benefits. BCE prioritization is potentially a cost-effective and scalable natural climate solution, but there are still barriers to overcome before blue carbon project adoption will become widespread. Mangroves, tidal marshes and seagrass meadows have historically been lost or degraded, threatening their ability to store carbon and provide ecosystem services. This Review details the global potential of blue carbon ecosystem protection and restoration in climate change mitigation, through carbon sequestration and co-benefit production. Blue carbon ecosystems (BCEs), including mangrove forests, tidal marshes and seagrass meadows, are gaining international recognition as a natural climate solution to contribute to climate change mitigation and adaptation targets. Global distribution is estimated as ~36–185 million ha of BCEs, potentially storing ~8,970–32,650 Tg C and providing important co-benefits. Protecting existing BCE could avoid emissions of 304 (141–466) Tg (95% CI bounds) carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) per year and large-scale restoration could remove an extra 841 (621–1,064) Tg CO2e per year by 2030, equivalent to ~3% (0.5–0.8% from protection and 2.3–2.5% from restoration) of annual global greenhouse gas emissions. Blue carbon’s potential as a nature-based solution will depend on societal actions; restoring BCE should be a key focus of the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021–2030). Emerging blue carbon markets should aim to incorporate the value of co-benefits into financial frameworks to assist with the investments required for restoration and conservation. Blue carbon ecosystems (BCEs), including mangrove forests, tidal marshes and seagrass meadows, are gaining international recognition as a natural climate solution to contribute to climate change mitigation and adaptation targets. Global distribution is estimated as ~36–185 million ha of BCEs, potentially storing ~8,970–32,650 Tg C and providing important co-benefits. Protecting existing BCE could avoid emissions of 304 (141–466) Tg (95% CI bounds) carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) per year and large-scale restoration could remove an extra 841 (621–1,064) Tg CO2e per year by 2030, equivalent to ~3% (0.5–0.8% from protection and 2.3–2.5% from restoration) of annual global greenhouse gas emissions. Blue carbon’s potential as a nature-based solution will depend on societal actions; restoring BCE should be a key focus of the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021–2030). Emerging blue carbon markets should aim to incorporate the value of co-benefits into financial frameworks to assist with the investments required for restoration and conservation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
(2018) · A New Era in Global Health · doi:10.1891/9780826190123.ap02 · Cited by 19,351
The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services
Barbier, E. B., Hacker, S. D., Kennedy, C., Koch, E. W., Stier, A. C., & Silliman, B. R. (2011) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/10-1510.1 · Cited by 5,654
THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE
Shine, K. (1990) · Weather · doi:10.1002/j.1477-8696.1990.tb05660.x · Cited by 5,462
SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine learning
Hengl, T., Mendes de Jesus, J., Heuvelink, G. B. M., Ruiperez Gonzalez, M., Kilibarda, M., Blagotić, A., Shangguan, W., Wright, M. N., Geng, X., Bauer-Marschallinger, B., et al. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169748 · Cited by 4,733
Accelerating loss of seagrasses across the globe threatens coastal ecosystems
Waycott, M., Duarte, C. M., Carruthers, T. J. B., Orth, R. J., Dennison, W. C., Olyarnik, S., Calladine, A., Fourqurean, J. W., Heck, K. L., Hughes, A. R., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0905620106 · Cited by 3,955
Self-citationUnited Nations Environment Programme
(1987) · International Organizations and the Law of the Sea 1985 · doi:10.1163/9789004634169_010 · Cited by 3,715
Mcleod, E., Chmura, G. L., Bouillon, S., Salm, R., Björk, M., Duarte, C. M., Lovelock, C. E., Schlesinger, W. H., & Silliman, B. R. (2011) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/110004 · Cited by 3,590
Self-citationGriscom, B. W., Adams, J., Ellis, P. W., Houghton, R. A., Lomax, G., Miteva, D. A., Schlesinger, W. H., Shoch, D., Siikamäki, J. V., Smith, P., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1710465114 · Cited by 3,481
A global crisis for seagrass ecosystems
ORTH, R. J., CARRUTHERS, T. J. B., DENNISON, W. C., DUARTE, C. M., FOURQUREAN, J. W., HECK, K. L., HUGHES, A. R., KENDRICK, G. A., KENWORTHY, W. J., OLYARNIK, S., et al. (2006) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2006)56[987:agcfse]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 3,100
Self-citationFriedlingstein, P., O'Sullivan, M., Jones, M. W., Andrew, R. M., Hauck, J., Olsen, A., Peters, G. P., Peters, W., Pongratz, J., Sitch, S., et al. (2020) · Earth System Science Data · doi:10.5194/essd-12-3269-2020 · Cited by 2,544
Cited by
Role of Macroalgal Forests within Mediterranean Shallow Bays in Blue Carbon Storage
Moreda, U., Mazarrasa, I., Cebrian, E., Kaal, J., Ricart, A. M., Serrano, E., & Serrano, O. (2024) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173219 · Cited by 13
The Verification Challenge of Marine Carbon Dioxide Removal
Fennel, K. (2026) · Annual Review of Marine Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-032123-025717 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Macreadie, P. I., Costa, M. D. P., Atwood, T. B., Friess, D. A., Kelleway, J. J., Kennedy, H., Lovelock, C. E., Serrano, O., & Duarte, C. M.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
- Published
- 2021-11-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 826-839
- ISSN
- 2662-138X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3208653382
- Cited by
- 1,081
- References
- 130
- FWCI
- 14.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blue carbon as a natural climate solution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s43017-021-00224-1
- The paper
- Macreadie, P. I., Costa, M. D. P., Atwood, T. B., Friess, D. A., Kelleway, J. J., Kennedy, H., Lovelock, C. E., Serrano, O., & Duarte, C. M. (2021). Blue carbon as a natural climate solution. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00224-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.