Cited by 57Protein Structure and DynamicsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsAdvanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions

A kinetic ensemble of the Alzheimer’s Aβ peptide

Open access
Löhr, Thomas, Kohlhoff, Kai, Heller, Gabriella T., Camilloni, Carlo, Vendruscolo, Michele·2021·Nature Computational Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The conformational and thermodynamic properties of disordered proteins are commonly described in terms of structural ensembles and free energy landscapes. To provide information on the transition rates between the different states populated by these proteins, it would be desirable to generalize this description to kinetic ensembles. Approaches based on the theory of stochastic processes can be particularly suitable for this purpose. Here, we develop a Markov state model and apply it to determine a kinetic ensemble of Aβ42, a disordered peptide associated with Alzheimer's disease. Through the Google Compute Engine, we generated 315-µs all-atom molecular dynamics trajectories. Using a probabilistic-based definition of conformational states in a neural network approach, we found that Aβ42 is characterized by inter-state transitions on the microsecond timescale, exhibiting only fully unfolded or short-lived, partially folded states. Our results illustrate how kinetic ensembles provide effective information about the structure, thermodynamics and kinetics of disordered proteins.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s43588-020-00003-w

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Löhr, T., Kohlhoff, K., Heller, G. T., Camilloni, C., & Vendruscolo, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • University of Milan (IT)
Venue
Nature Computational Science
Published
2021-01-14
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
71-78
ISSN
2662-8457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3119087029
Cited by
57
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Computational Science (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Newnham College, University of Cambridge
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
Keywords
amyloid-beta 42, Markov state models, intrinsically disordered proteins, Alzheimer's disease, conformational change, transition rates, free energy landscape, all-atom molecular dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review