Cited by 75Computational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in Materials Science

MISATO: machine learning dataset of protein–ligand complexes for structure-based drug discovery

Open access
Siebenmorgen, Till, Menezes, Filipe, Benassou, Sabrina, Merdivan, Erinc, Didi, Kieran, Mourão, André Santos Dias, Kitel, Radosław, Liò, Pietro +5 more·2024·Nature Computational Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Large language models have greatly enhanced our ability to understand biology and chemistry, yet robust methods for structure-based drug discovery, quantum chemistry and structural biology are still sparse. Precise biomolecule–ligand interaction datasets are urgently needed for large language models. To address this, we present MISATO, a dataset that combines quantum mechanical properties of small molecules and associated molecular dynamics simulations of ~20,000 experimental protein–ligand complexes with extensive validation of experimental data. Starting from the existing experimental structures, semi-empirical quantum mechanics was used to systematically refine these structures. A large collection of molecular dynamics traces of protein–ligand complexes in explicit water is included, accumulating over 170 μs. We give examples of machine learning (ML) baseline models proving an improvement of accuracy by employing our data. An easy entry point for ML experts is provided to enable the next generation of drug discovery artificial intelligence models.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s43588-024-00627-2

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Siebenmorgen, T., Menezes, F., Benassou, S., Merdivan, E., Didi, K., Mourão, A. S. D., Kitel, R., Liò, P., Kesselheim, S., Piraud, M., Theis, F. J., Sattler, M., & Popowicz, G. M.
Affiliations
  • Helmholtz Munich (DE)
  • Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Jagiellonian University (PL)
Corresponding author
Popowicz, Grzegorz M.
Venue
Nature Computational Science
Published
2024-05-10
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
367-378
ISSN
2662-8457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4396789292
Cited by
75
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1
FWCI
15.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Computational Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Homo Politicus (Academy of Humanities and Economics in Lodz) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (031L0268)
  • Helmholtz Zentrum München
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
Keywords
protein-ligand complex, structure-based drug design, large language models, molecular dynamics simulation, semiempirical quantum mechanics, structure refinement, explicit water
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Ligands, Proteins, Quantum Theory, Drug Discovery, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review