Cited by 2Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsGenomics and Rare DiseasesComputational Drug Discovery Methods

A multimodal framework for comprehensive driver variant prediction in cancer

Open access
Yang, Hai, Chen, Yijia, Zhou, Tianyi, Wang, Yingzhuo, Zhou, Qin, Xiao, Ting, Zhang, Qian, Zhang, Jing +2 more·2025·Communications Medicine

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Cancer's genomic complexity poses significant challenges in identifying the crucial driver variants that fuel oncogenesis. To overcome these obstacles, we present ModVAR, an innovative multimodal model that seamlessly integrates DNA sequences, protein tertiary structures, and cancer omics data to predict driver variants with exceptional precision. Leveraging pre-trained models DNAbert2 and ESMFold, combined with a novel self-supervised strategy for omics data, ModVAR consistently outperforms 14 leading prediction methods. It achieves an outstanding AUROC of 0.985 in clinical benchmarks and 0.952 in experimental assay-related benchmarks, underscoring its effectiveness in identifying both clinically and experimentally validated variants. ModVAR also excels in predicting cancer indels, with an AUROC of 0.901, and demonstrates remarkable generalization with an AUROC of 0.981 for non-cancer disease variants. These results underscore ModVAR's robustness and versatility, positioning it as a powerful tool in genomics and precision medicine. Additionally, its application to COSMIC has generated a publicly available resource of 3,971,946 annotated variants, driving an advancement in cancer research and personalized therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s43856-025-01209-7

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Yang, H., Chen, Y., Zhou, T., Wang, Y., Zhou, Q., Xiao, T., Zhang, Q., Zhang, J., Li, D., & Wang, Z.
Affiliations
  • East China University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Wang, Zhe
Venue
Communications Medicine
Published
2025-11-26
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
499-499
ISSN
2730-664X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4416720926
Cited by
2
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61902126)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFF1204904)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
multimodal learning, protein structure prediction, cancer omics, ESMFold, self-supervised learning, molecular docking, drug target prioritization, intrinsically disordered regions, variant annotation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review