Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Applying continuous-time models to ecological momentary assessments: A practical introduction to the method and demonstration with clinical data

Abplanalp, Samuel J., Reavis, Eric A., Le, Thanh P., Green, Michael F.·2024·NPP—Digital Psychiatry and Neuroscience

Abstract

Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is a frequently used approach among clinical researchers to collect naturalistic data in real time. EMA data can provide insights into the temporal dynamics of psychological processes. Traditional methods used to analyze EMA data, such as hierarchical linear modeling and multilevel vector auto-regression, paint an incomplete picture of the dynamics of psychological processes because they cannot capture how variables evolve outside predefined measurement occasions. Continuous-time models, an analytical approach that treats variables as dynamical systems that evolve continuously, overcome this limitation. Time advances smoothly in continuous-time models, contrasting with standard discrete-time models in which time progresses in finite jumps. This paper presents a practical introduction to continuous-time models for analyzing EMA data. To illustrate the method and its interpretation, we provide an empirical demonstration of a continuous-time model utilizing EMA data of real-time loneliness and mood states (happiness, sadness, and anxiety) from a clinical sample comprising Veterans with a history of mental illness. Psychological variables, such as feelings of loneliness or sadness, can often change many times throughout the day. However, standard ways of analyzing these variables do not accurately capture these changes and fluctuations. Here, we highlight the benefits of continuous-time models, a method that can capture subtle changes in such psychological variables over time.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s44277-024-00004-x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Shiffman S, Stone AA, Hufford MR. Ecological momentary assessment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2008;4:1–32. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Voelkle MC, Oud JH, Davidov E, Schmidt P. An SEM approach to continuous time modeling of panel data: relating authoritarianism and anomia. Psychol Methods. 2012;17:176–92. · DOI
  3. de Haan-Rietdijk S, Voelkle MC, Keijsers L, Hamaker EL. Discrete- vs. continuous-time modeling of unequally spaced experience sampling method data. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1849. · DOI
  4. Voelkle MC, Oud JH. Continuous time modelling with individually varying time intervals for oscillating and non-oscillating processes. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2013;66:103–26. · DOI
  5. Ryan O, Hamaker EL. Time to Intervene: A continuous-time approach to network analysis and centrality. Psychometrika. 2022;87:214–52. · DOI
  6. Ryan O, Kuiper RM, Hamaker EL: A continuous-time approach to intensive longitudinal data: what, why and how? In: Continuous time modeling in the behavioral and related sciences, editors Montfort KV, Oud JHL, Voelkle MC. New York, NY: Springer; 2018. 27–54. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Stone AA, Schneider S, Smyth JM. Evaluation of pressing issues in ecological momentary assessment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2023;19:107–31. · DOI
  8. Woltman H, Feldstain A, MacKay JC, Rocchi M. An introduction to hierarchical linear modeling. Tutorials Quant Methods Psychology. 2012;8:52–69. · DOI
  9. Bringmann LF, Vissers N, Wichers M, Geschwind N, Kuppens P, Peeters F, et al. A network approach to psychopathology: new insights into clinical longitudinal data. PLoS One. 2013;8:e60188. · DOI
  10. Hamaker EL, Kuiper RM, Grasman RP. A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychol Methods. 2015;20:102–16. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Epskamp S, Waldorp LJ, Mõttus R, Borsboom D. The Gaussian Graphical Model in cross-sectional and time-series data. Multivariate Behav Res. 2018;53:453–80. · DOI
  12. Hamaker EL, Wichers M. No time like the present: discovering the hidden dynamics in intensive longitudinal data. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2017;26:10–15. · DOI
  13. Batra R, Johal SK, Chen M, Ferrer E. Consequences of sampling frequency on the estimated dynamics of AR processes using continuous-time models. Psychol Methods. Published online July 10, 2023. · DOI
  14. Mülken O, Blumen A. Continuous-time quantum walks: models for coherent transport on complex networks. Phys. Rep. 2011;502:37–87. · DOI
  15. Andersen TG, Benzoni L, Lund J. An empirical investigation of continuous-time equity return models. J. Finance. 2002;57:1239–84. · DOI
  16. Andersen TG, Bollerslev T, Frederiksen P, Ørregaard Nielsen M. Continuous-time models, realized volatilities, and testable distributional implications for daily stock returns. J. Appl. Econ. 2010;25:233–61. · DOI
  17. Coppersmith DDL, Ryan O, Fortgang RG, Millner AJ, Kleiman EM, Nock MK. Mapping the timescale of suicidal thinking. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2023;120:e2215434120. · DOI
  18. Moggia D, Bennemann B, Schwartz B, Hehlmann MI, Driver CC, Lutz W. Process-Based psychotherapy personalization: considering causality with continuous-time dynamic modeling. Psychother Res. 2023;33:1076–95. · DOI
  19. Ruissen GR, Beauchamp MR, Puterman E, Zumbo BD, Rhodes RE, Hives BA, et al. Continuous-time modeling of the bidirectional relationship between incidental affect and physical activity. Ann Behav Med. 2022;56:1284–99. · DOI
  20. Hauger GS. Instantaneous rate of change: a numerical approach. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2000;31:891–7. · DOI
  21. Särkkä S, Solin A. Applied Stochastic Differential Equations. Cambridge University Press. 2019. 324 p. (Institute of Mathematical Statistics Textbooks). · DOI · Paper page
  22. Sobczyk K. Stochastic differential equations: with applications to physics and engineering (Vol. 40). 2001. Springer Science & Business Media.
  23. Driver CC, Voelkle MC. Hierarchical Bayesian continuous time dynamic modeling. Psychol Methods. 2018;23:774–99. · DOI
  24. Hamilton JD. Time series analysis (Vol. 2). 1994. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  25. Oravecz Z, Tuerlinckx F, Vandekerckhove J. A hierarchical latent stochastic differential equation model for affective dynamics. Psychol. Methods. 2011;16:468–90. · DOI
  26. Adolf JK, Loossens T, Tuerlinckx F, Ceulemans E. Optimal sampling rates for reliable continuous-time first-order autoregressive and vector autoregressive modeling. Psychol Methods. 2021;26:701–18. · DOI
  27. Driver CC, Voelkle, MC Understanding the time course of interventions with continuous time dynamic models. In KL Montfort, JH Oud, MC Voelkle (Eds.). Continuous time modeling in the behavioral and related sciences. New York: Springer;2018. 179–203. · DOI
  28. Dahlberg L, McKee KJ, Frank A, Naseer M. A systematic review of longitudinal risk factors for loneliness in older adults. Aging Ment Health. 2022;26:225–49. · DOI
  29. Buecker S, Horstmann KT, Luhmann M. Lonely today, lonely tomorrow: Temporal dynamics of loneliness in everyday life and its associations with psychopathological symptoms. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 2024;15:170–181. · DOI
  30. Hecht M, Zitzmann S. Sample size recommendations for continuous-time models: Compensating shorter time series with larger numbers of persons and vice versa. Struct. Equ. Model. 2021;28:229–36. · DOI
  31. Driver CC, Oud JHL, Voelkle MC. Continuous time structural equation modeling with R Package ctsem. J. Stat. Soft. 2017;77:1–35. · DOI
  32. Ryan O, Dablander F. Equilibrium Causal Models: ConnEcting Dynamical Systems Modeling And Cross-sectional Data Analysis. https://psyarxiv.com/q4d9g. 2022. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Abplanalp, S. J., Reavis, E. A., Le, T. P., & Green, M. F.
Venue
NPP—Digital Psychiatry and Neuroscience
Published
2024-03-07
Volume
2
Issue
1
ISSN
2948-1570
Cited by
17
References
7
Language
en
Funders
Center for Integrated Healthcare, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (RX003165)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review