Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 42Spinal Cord Injury ResearchDisability Rights and RepresentationOccupational Therapy Practice and Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Self-perceived participation among adults with spinal cord injury: a grounded theory study

Ripat, J D, Woodgate, R L·2012·Spinal Cord
DOI 10.1038/sc.2012.77
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Study design A grounded theory study of 19 adults with spinal cord injury was conducted. Participants engaged in individual in-depth interviews, and took photographs of aspects of their environment that promoted and restricted participation. Analysis consisted of an inductive process of constant comparison. A focus group with participants was held to discuss and contribute to the credibility of findings. Objectives To develop a theoretical understanding of the influences on self-perceived participation for individuals with SCI. Setting Manitoba, Canada. Results The constructed grounded theory model is summarized as follows: negotiating the body-environment interface is a continuous process for those living with a SCI. Despite the relative stability of their changed body, they live in a changed world, one that is perceived differently after SCI. People use various strategies to interact within their environment, to engage in a process of participation. Intervening conditions are the environmental aspects that serve as barriers or facilitators to this process of participation. Conclusions Study findings lend support to the need for a self-perceived definition of participation. The theory constructed in this study can be used to target interventions intended to improve the participation experiences of individuals with SCI.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sc.2012.77

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Dietz ML, Prus RC, Shaffir W . Doing Everyday Life: Ethnography as Human Lived Experience. Copp Clark Longman Ltd.: Missisauga, ON. 1994.
  2. Semple K, Blowes B, Seggles E, Baptiste S . Inclusive environments: The role of occupational therapy. Occup Ther Now 2010; 12: 16–18.

Cited by

See all 42

Metadata

Authors
Ripat, J. D., & Woodgate, R. L.
Affiliations
University of Manitoba (CA)
Corresponding author
Ripat, J D
ORCID
Venue
Spinal Cord
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2012-07-03
Volume
50
Issue
12
Pages
908-914
ISSN
  • 1362-4393 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5624
DOI
10.1038/sc.2012.77
OpenAlex
W1969874508
Cited by
42
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Spinal Cord (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Manitoba
  • Canadian Occupational Therapy Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Keywords
spinal cord injury, participation strategies, adults with disabilities
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Data Collection, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Environment, Female, Humans, Male, Manitoba, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Self Concept, Social Behavior, Social Environment, Spinal Cord Injuries, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.