The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities
Abstract
PURPOSE: Although participation is an important construct and valued goal, how it is conceptualized, defined and measured varies widely. This qualitative, multi-site study sought to gain an insider perspective from people with disabilities in grounding what participation means, how to characterize it, and the barriers and supports to participation. METHOD: Sixty-three people self-identifying with diverse disabilities participated in qualitative focus groups across sites. RESULTS: Participants conceptualized participation as a cluster of values that included active and meaningful engagement/being a part of, choice and control, access and opportunity/enfranchisement, personal and societal responsibilities, having an impact and supporting others, and social connection, inclusion and membership. CONCLUSIONS: No gold standard for ideal or optimal participation emerged; no one defined set or frequency of activities accounted for 'full' participation. Participants described needing to be free to define and pursue participation on their own terms rather than meeting predetermined societal norms. Participation was viewed as both a right and a responsibility, influenced by and ascribed to the person and to the society. Participation does not occur in a vacuum; the environment dynamically influences participation. Implications of this conceptual framing for assessment, research and systems level change to support participation of people with disabilities are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PERENBOOM, R. J. M., & CHORUS, A. M. J. (2003) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/0963828031000137081 · Cited by 373
Cited by
Validity of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation
Post, M. W. M., van der Zee, C. H., Hennink, J., Schafrat, C. G., Visser-Meily, J. M. A., & van Berlekom, S. B. (2012) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.3109/09638288.2011.608148 · Cited by 268
Taylor, A. M., Phillips, K., Patel, K. V., Turk, D. C., Dworkin, R. H., Beaton, D., Clauw, D. J., Gignac, M. A. M., Markman, J. D., Williams, D. A., et al. (2016) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000577 · Cited by 208
Association between satisfaction and participation in everyday occupations after stroke
Bergström, A., Guidetti, S., Tham, K., & Eriksson, G. (2017) · Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.1080/11038128.2016.1245782 · Cited by 62
Yuan, C. W., Hanrahan, B. V., Lee, S., Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2017) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3134753 · Cited by 42
Self-perceived participation among adults with spinal cord injury: a grounded theory study
Ripat, J. D., & Woodgate, R. L. (2012) · Spinal Cord · doi:10.1038/sc.2012.77 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Hammel, J., Magasi, S., Heinemann, A., Whiteneck, G., Bogner, J., & Rodriguez, E.
- Venue
- Disability and Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 1445-1460
- ISSN
- 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5165
- OpenAlex
- W2161601040
- Cited by
- 645
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 54.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09638280701625534
- The paper
- Hammel, J., Magasi, S., Heinemann, A., Whiteneck, G., Bogner, J., & Rodriguez, E. (2008). What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280701625534
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.