Demystifying the Digital Divide
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a significant digital divide within and across societies, meaning not everyone has equal access to the currently available technology or possesses the skills for using it.
“Although this is true for the majority of people on our planet (cf.Domo, 2022Domo, , 2023)), there is still a significant digital divide within and across societies (van Dijk, 2020;Warschauer, 2003).”
From Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model (2024) · cites this paper as Warschauer, 2003
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Personalization versus Customization: The Importance of Agency, Privacy, and Power Usage
Sundar, S. S., & Marathe, S. S. (2010) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01377.x · Cited by 588 · see citing works
Internet use among older Europeans: An analysis based on SHARE data
König, R., Seifert, A., & Doh, M. (2018) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-018-0609-5 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2015) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972243.2015.1069770 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
Designing mobile interfaces for novice and low-literacy users
Medhi, I., Patnaik, S., Brunskill, E., Gautama, S. N. N., Thies, W., & Toyama, K. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/1959022.1959024 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Ethnomethodological architectures: Information systems driven by cultural and community visions
Srinivasan, R. (2007) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20544 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Kajee, L. (2010) · The Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2010.511783 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model
Hutmacher, F., Appel, M., & Schwan, S. (2024) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2024.2384125 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Warschauer, M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Warschauer, Mark
- ORCID
- Warschauer, Mark
- Venue
- Scientific American
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 289
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 42-47
- ISSN
- 0036-8733 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032010505
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 41.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Scientific American (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › ICT Impact and Policies
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Information Society and Technology Trends
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Technology
- Keywords
- digital divide, access to technology, information technology inequality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
