Cited by 295Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical MechanicsAdvanced Thermodynamic Systems and EnginesPhilosophy and History of Science

Demons, Engines and the Second Law

Bennett, Charles H.·1987·Scientific American

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/scientificamerican1187-108

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bennett showed that all computations could be performed using reversible logical operations only.

    “In 1973, Bennett 28 -30 showed that all computations could be performed using reversible logical operations only.”

    From Ultimate physical limits to computation (2000) · cites this paper as [30]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bennett, C. H.
Corresponding author
Bennett, Charles H.
Venue
Scientific American
Published
1987-11
Volume
257
Issue
5
Pages
108-116
ISSN
0036-8733 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047991033
Cited by
295
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Scientific American (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Thermodynamic Systems and Engines
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
second law of thermodynamics, entropy, heat engines, demons, information and entropy, irreversibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review