The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 10 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Sex-specific median life expectancies from ex situ populations for 330 animal species
Open accessAbstract
We present life expectancy estimates for hundreds of vertebrate species based on carefully vetted studbook data from North American zoos and aquariums. These data include sex-specific median life expectancies as well as sample size and 95% confidence limits for each estimate. Existing longevity data for animals primarily consist of maximum lifespan values, which are single observations rather than statistically derived estimates of longevity. Moreover, all of our estimates are based on the same type of data and calculated using consistent, standardized methods. To derive these estimates, we conducted Kaplan-Meier survival analyses using individual-level demographic data (i.e., records of birth and mortality events) from studbook records for each ex situ population. Our species set represents a range of vertebrate taxa (primarily mammals, birds, amphibians, and reptiles) and diverse life histories. This dataset will have broad utility, not only for informing comparative demographic and life history studies, but also more broadly for any research or conservation application that requires sex- or species-specific life expectancy information.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This paper presents a dataset of sex-specific median life expectancies (MLEs) for 330 animal species or subspecies, derived from vetted North American zoo and aquarium studbooks using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. It provides MLEs, sample sizes, and 95% confidence limits for ex situ populations, with estimates for 270 female and 258 male populations after excluding insufficient data.
Key findings
- The dataset includes 330 unique species or subspecies, with female MLE estimates for 270 populations and male MLE estimates for 258 populations.
- Sample sizes ranged from 41 individuals (female Madagascar buttonquail) to 1,425 individuals (male Caribbean flamingo); mean sample size was 254.1 (±209.4 SD) for female MLEs and 242.1 (±198.7 SD) for male MLEs.
- Most MLEs came from survival analyses conducted in the past 5 years: 309 of 330 records were from 2014–2018, with the remainder from 2010–2013.
- The dataset also includes overall MLEs based on all studbook data, plus sex-specific MLEs, sample sizes, and 95% confidence limits; two columns flag whether male or female estimates failed at least one of five data quality tests.
Methods
- Individual-level demographic data were obtained from validated studbooks for ex situ populations in North American zoos and aquariums, primarily Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) member institutions and collaborating non-member institutions.
- Age-specific survival probabilities were estimated using non-parametric Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, handling right censoring and left truncation; analysis start age was set at 365 days, and time windows typically began in 1980 or later.
- MLE was calculated as the age at which survival probability equaled 0.5 via linear interpolation, then divided by 365 to yield years; 95% log-transformed confidence intervals were calculated, and calculations were implemented in PopLink version 2.4.
Limitations
- The paper states that lifespan likely differs between ex situ and in situ settings, so the dataset may only approximate expected longevity for wild animals; existing large-scale wild lifespan datasets mostly contain maximum longevity values and are not comparable with these MLEs.
- The paper states that individual studbook databases cannot all be shared, and that MLE estimates start at 365 days, excluding individuals that did not survive to their first birthday; users should interpret MLEs as typical life expectancy after surviving the first year.
- The paper states that estimates failing any of five data quality tests are marked “Data deficient” and may still be reported, but it recommends excluding those values from formal analysis for the most reliable results; the text also makes evident that sex-specific MLEs were not available for all populations.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
1 of 10 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
In total, the dataset included entries for 330 unique species or subspecies.
“In total, our dataset included entries for 330 unique species or subspecies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Some populations had sufficient demographic data to reliably estimate MLE only for the overall population or only for one sex.
“Some populations had sufficient demographic data to reliably estimate MLE only for the overall population or only for one sex.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The longevity estimates are derived from studbooks for animal populations in North American zoos and aquariums.
“Specifically, our longevity estimates are derived from studbooks for animal populations in North American zoos and aquariums.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The studbook data were vetted by population biologists advising each ex situ population.
“These data are carefully vetted by population biologists working with each population, and we then used them to estimate Kaplan-Meier survival curves and to calculate MLE for each species (see Methods).”
- Also stated in: § Technical Validation · plain
“First, each studbook was vetted by the population biologist who was advising the ex situ population (see Methods).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Technical Validation · plain
- Premisecitation
Studbooks contain individual-level demographic information for all animals in the population.
“The studbooks contain individual-level demographic information (e.g., birthdates, reproduction events, and death dates when applicable) for all animals in the population11.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] Ballou, J. D. et al. In Wild mammals in captivity: Principles and techniques for zoo management (eds Kleiman D. G., Thompson K. V. & Baer C. K. ) Ch. 19. (University of Chicago Press, 2010).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductreasoning
The technical quality of the life expectancy dataset was ensured by carrying out validation procedures at three points in the calculations.
“We ensured the technical quality of our life expectancy dataset by carrying out validation procedures at three points in our calculations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The non-parametric Kaplan Meier survival analysis correctly handles both right censoring and left truncation, which are common in studbook datasets.
“This method correctly handles both right censoring (individuals that are alive at the end of the analysis window) and left truncation (individuals that enter the dataset after their birthdate), which are common in studbook datasets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [12] Klein, J. P. & Moeschberger, M. L. Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data. (Springer, 1997).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [13] Skalski, J. R., Ryding, K. E. & Millspaugh, J. J. Wildlife Demography: Analysis of Sex, Age, and Count Data. (Elsevier, 2005).
- Premisecitation
Median life expectancies provide more robust estimates of species longevity because they are statistically derived from a sample of observed lifespans.
“MLEs provide more robust estimates of species longevity because they are statistically derived from a sample (in our case, typically hundreds) of observed lifespans10.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Wiese, R. J. & Willis, K. Calculation of longevity and life expectancy in captive elephants. Zoo Biol. 23, 365–373 (2004). source
- Premisecitation
Existing data for animal longevity typically include values for the maximum observed lifespan of a species.
“Existing data for animal longevity7–9 typically include values for the maximum observed lifespan of a species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [7] Carey, J. R. & Judge, D. S. Longevity Records: Life Spans of Mammals, Birds, Amphibians, Reptiles, and Fish. (Odense University Press, 2000).
- cites [8] de Magalhaes, J. P. & Costa, J. A database of vertebrate longevity records and their relation to other life-history traits. J Evol Biol 22, 1770–1774 (2009). source
- cites [9] Tacutu, R. et al. Human Ageing Genomic Resources: New and updated databases. Nucleic Acids Res 46, D1083–D1109 (2018). source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 15
- Probably not a substantial claim. 24
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationExisting large-scale datasets on animal lifespans from wild populations mostly consist of maximum longevity values, and therefore are not comparable with the median life expectancy estimates.
“Unfortunately, existing large-scale datasets on animal lifespans from wild populations7–9 mostly consist of maximum longevity values, and therefore are not comparable with our median life expectancy estimates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [7] Carey, J. R. & Judge, D. S. Longevity Records: Life Spans of Mammals, Birds, Amphibians, Reptiles, and Fish. (Odense University Press, 2000).
- cites [8] de Magalhaes, J. P. & Costa, J. A database of vertebrate longevity records and their relation to other life-history traits. J Evol Biol 22, 1770–1774 (2009). source
- cites [9] Tacutu, R. et al. Human Ageing Genomic Resources: New and updated databases. Nucleic Acids Res 46, D1083–D1109 (2018). source
The AnAge section (page unavailable) describes a large animal-longevity database whose entries contain maximum longevity values, including values from wild specimens; mortality parameters are available only for some entries. It does not establish that large-scale datasets from wild populations generally consist mostly of maximum values, nor does it discuss comparison with median life expectancy estimates. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe mean sample size across species was 254.1 (±209.4 SD) individuals for female MLEs, and 242.1 (±198.7 SD) individuals for male MLEs.
“The mean sample size across species was 254.1 (±209.4 SD) individuals for female MLEs, and 242.1 (±198.7 SD) individuals for male MLEs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
FindingreasoningThe analysis time windows were typically from 1980 or later to the present.
“The resulting analysis time windows were typically from 1980 or later to the present.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe dataset includes over 300 vertebrate species, primarily mammals and birds but also reptiles and amphibians.
“Our dataset includes over 300 vertebrate species, which primarily consist of mammals and birds but also include a number of reptiles and amphibians (see Data Records).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataExcluding estimates based on insufficient studbook data, the dataset contained estimates of female MLE for 270 populations and of male MLE for 258 populations.
“Excluding the estimates based on insufficient studbook data, our dataset contained estimates of female MLE for 270 populations and of male MLE for 258 populations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe smallest analysis that still produced a sex-specific MLE estimate included 41 individuals (female Madagascar buttonquail), whereas the largest included 1425 individuals (male Caribbean flamingo).
“In terms of sample sizes, the smallest analysis that still produced a sex-specific MLE estimate included 41 individuals (for female Madagascar buttonquail), whereas the largest included 1425 individuals (for male Caribbean flamingo).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenThe authors are unable to share all of the individual studbook databases from which the MLE estimates are derived.
“Unfortunately, we are unable to share all of the individual studbook databases from which our MLE estimates are derived.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe studbook data used to calculate MLEs represented thousands of animals in AZA member institutions and other collaborating institutions, the majority located in the United States.
“The studbook data used to calculate MLEs represented thousands of animals in AZA member institutions and other collaborating institutions, the majority of which are located in the United States.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenThe full MLE dataset has been deposited in figshare.
“The full MLE dataset has been deposited in figshare (Data Citation 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
FindingreasoningValues marked as Data deficient were included in the dataset because it may still be informative to know that life expectancy was attempted to be evaluated for those species.
“We included these values in our dataset as it may still be informative to know that we have attempted to evaluate life expectancy for those species.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataMost of the MLEs came from survival analyses conducted in the past 5 years (309 of 330 records from 2014-2018), and the remaining were analyzed from 2010-2013.
“Most of the MLEs came from survival analyses that were conducted in the past 5 years (309 of 330 records were from 2014–2018), and the remaining were analyzed from 2010–2013.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe paper presents life expectancy estimates for hundreds of vertebrate species based on vetted studbook data from North American zoos and aquariums.
“We present life expectancy estimates for hundreds of vertebrate species based on carefully vetted studbook data from North American zoos and aquariums.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown dataTwo additional columns indicated whether the male or female MLE estimates were based on datasets that failed at least one of the five data quality tests.
“Two additional columns in the dataset indicated whether the male or female MLE estimates were based on datasets that failed at least one of the five data quality tests (Data Deficient = “yes”; see Technical Validation).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe dataset table included species' common name, scientific name, taxonomic group, sample size, MLE estimates, and lower and upper 95% confidence limits.
“The table included the species’ common name, scientific name, taxonomic group, sample size, MLE estimates (in years), and the lower and upper 95% confidence limits (in years).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenSex-specific MLEs were estimated based on only the male or female data.
“We also estimated sex-specific MLEs based on only the male or female data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown dataThe last four variables were separated into sex-specific columns: overall MLE estimates, male MLE estimates, and female MLE estimates.
“The last four variables were separated into sex-specific columns: one set for the overall MLE estimates (those calculated from all studbook data including unknown-sex individuals), one set for male MLE estimates (those calculated from male data only), and one set for female MLE estimates (those calculated from female data only).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe dataset includes sex-specific median life expectancies, sample size, and 95% confidence limits for each estimate.
“These data include sex-specific median life expectancies as well as sample size and 95% confidence limits for each estimate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenFor each population, an overall MLE estimate was calculated based on the entire studbook dataset, including males, females, and any individuals of unknown sex.
“For each population, we calculated an overall MLE estimate that is based on the entire studbook dataset, including males, females, and any individuals of unknown sex.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThe MLE estimates are derived using the same data sources and consistent methodology for all species, providing reliable quantitative data on the relative longevity among a diverse set of species.
“The most powerful use of our dataset will lie in comparative analyses, because our MLE estimates are derived using the same data sources and consistent methodology for all species, providing reliable quantitative data on the relative longevity among a diverse set of species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenAttempts are made to resolve records for any individuals with unknown birth or death dates.
“Attempts are made to resolve records for any individuals with unknown birth or death dates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductreasoningIf the studbook dataset failed any of the five data quality tests, MLE cannot be reliably estimated and the estimate is marked as being "Data deficient," although a value may still be reported.
“If the studbook dataset failed any of these tests, MLE cannot be reliably estimated and the estimate is marked as being “Data deficient,” although a value may still be reported.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenIndividuals in the studbook that did not survive to their first birthday were excluded from the survival analyses.
“Individuals in the studbook that did not survive to their first birthday were excluded from the survival analyses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductown dataThe dataset's estimates for all species are derived from the same type of data and from the same sources, and calculated using consistent, standardized methods.
“Moreover, all of our estimates are based on the same type of data and calculated using consistent, standardized methods.”
- Also stated in: § Background & Summary · plain
“Our dataset also differs from existing longevity data because estimates for all species are derived from the same type of data and from the same sources, and calculated using consistent, standardized methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Background & Summary · plain
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisereasoningMaximum lifespans are usually single observations and can represent outliers rather than biological tendencies.
“Maximum lifespans are usually single observations, and therefore can represent outliers rather than biological tendencies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenA trained population biologist validates each studbook through automated error checking and discussions with program leaders to ensure all records are accurate and common errors are corrected.
“As part of this process, the biologist validates each studbook through automated error checking and discussions with program leaders to ensure all records are accurate and common errors are corrected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenStudbook records with high uncertainty were excluded from the survival analysis.
“Second, studbook records with high uncertainty were excluded from the survival analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Interpretationnone givenBecause lifespan likely differs between ex situ and in situ settings, the dataset may only provide approximations of the expected longevity for wild animals.
“Because lifespan likely differs between ex situ and in situ settings, our dataset may only provide approximations of the expected longevity for wild animals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Lifespan likely differs between ex situ and in situ settings.
Probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenIndividuals with unknown birthdates, unknown dates of other important events, and/or events at unknown or unrecognized institutions were not included in the calculations.
“Specifically, individuals with unknown birthdates, unknown dates of other important events (e.g., transfers between institutions, death), and/or events at unknown or unrecognized institutions were not included in the calculations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe starting age for the survival analysis was set at 365 days.
“By definition, survivorship is 1.0 at the starting age for the analysis, which we set at age 365 days.”
- Also stated in: § Usage Notes · plain
“For accurate interpretation of our dataset, we reiterate that the starting age for our survival analysis was set at 365 days for all species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Usage Notes · plain
Probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe PopLink program applied five data quality tests to determine whether each studbook contained sufficient data to provide reliable estimates of MLE.
“Third, the PopLink program applied five data quality tests to determine whether each studbook contained sufficient data to provide reliable estimates of MLE:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningUsers should interpret the MLE estimates as the typical life expectancy after an animal has survived its first year.
“Users should interpret our MLE estimates as the typical life expectancy after an animal has survived its first year.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenMortality in the first year of life can be highly dependent both on life history and on the specific management or animal care strategies at the time and may not be generalizable across settings.
“This was because mortality in the first year of life can be highly dependent both on life history and on the specific management or animal care strategies at the time and may not be generalizable across settings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Typical studbook errors affecting longevity estimates include entries for life events after a death event, missing death events leading to very old individuals, and duplicated entries for an individual.
“Typical studbook errors affecting longevity estimates include having entries for life events after a death event, missing death events leading to very old individuals, and duplicated entries for an individual.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Lifespan likely differs between ex situ and in situ settings.
“Because lifespan likely differs between ex situ and in situ settings, our dataset may only provide approximations of the expected longevity for wild animals.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Klein and Moeschberger cited with the wrong reference number
MinorThe text identifies Klein and Moeschberger as reference 12, but the reference list assigns their book number 13. Reference 12 is by Ballou et al.
“following Klein and Moeschberger12, equation 4.6.1”
“13. Klein J. P. & Moeschberger M. L. Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data. (Springer, 1997).”
Citations
Cites
Survival Analysis Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data
Rao, M. B., Klein, J. P., & Moeschberger, M. L. (1998) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270658 · Cited by 3,617
Life-History Tactics: A Review of the Ideas
Stearns, S. C. (1976) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/409052 · Cited by 3,557
Diversity of ageing across the tree of life
Jones, O. R., Scheuerlein, A., Salguero‐Gómez, R., Camarda, C. G., Schaible, R., Casper, B. B., Dahlgren, J. P., Ehrlén, J., Garcia, M. B., Menges, E. S., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12789 · Cited by 1,042
Relationships between body size and some life history parameters
Blueweiss, L., Fox, H., Kudzma, V., Nakashima, D. J., Peters, R., & Sams, S. (1978) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00344996 · Cited by 845
Human Ageing Genomic Resources: new and updated databases
Tacutu, R., Thornton, D., Johnson, E., Budovsky, A., Barardo, D., Craig, T., Diana, E., Lehmann, G., Toren, D., Wang, J., et al. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1042 · Cited by 738
A database of vertebrate longevity records and their relation to other life‐history traits
DE MAGALHÃES, J. P., & COSTA, J. (2009) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01783.x · Cited by 543
Wild Mammals in Captivity: Principles and Techniques for Zoo Management, Second Edition
Kleiman, D. G., Thompson, K. V., & Baer, C. K. (2010) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226440118.001.0001 · Cited by 438
LIFE HISTORY VARIATION IN PRIMATES
Harvey, P. H., & Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1985) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00395.x · Cited by 372
Turbill, C., Bieber, C., & Ruf, T. (2011) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0190 · Cited by 346
LIFE HISTORY PATTERNS IN MARINE FISHES AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES FOR FISHERIES MANAGEMENT
Adams, P. B. (1980) · Cited by 238
Calculation of longevity and life expectancy in captive elephants
Wiese, R. J., & Willis, K. (2004) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.20011 · Cited by 62
Che‐Castaldo, J. P. (2019) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.7539968 · Cited by 1
Self-citation(2005)
(2000) · UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA)
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Long-lived animals with negligible senescence: clues for ageing research
Stenvinkel, P., & Shiels, P. G. (2019) · Biochemical Society Transactions · doi:10.1042/bst20190105 · Cited by 73
Biomimetics – Nature's roadmap to insights and solutions for burden of lifestyle diseases
Stenvinkel, P., Painer, J., Johnson, R. J., & Natterson-Horowitz, B. (2019) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/joim.12982 · Cited by 50
Dodd, S. A. S., Dewey, C. E., Khosa, D. K., & Verbrugghe, A. (2021) · BMC Veterinary Research · doi:10.1186/s12917-021-02754-8 · Cited by 35
Taxonomic Distribution of Neoplasia among Non-Domestic Felid Species under Managed Care
Moresco, A., Karina Muñoz, D., Gutiérrez, F., Arias-Bernal, L., Yarto-Jaramillo, E., Teixeira, R. H. F., Peña-Stadlin, J., & Troan, B. V. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10122376 · Cited by 21
Tschirren, B., Romero‐Haro, A. Á., Zahn, S., & Criscuolo, F. (2020) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/jeb.13744 · Cited by 15
Dog Life Spans and the Evolution of Aging
da Silva, J., & Cross, B. J. (2023) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/724384 · Cited by 12
da Silva, J. P., Rahal, S. C., Castiglioni, M. C. R., Gonçalves, R. A. B., Doiche, D. P., Moresco, A., Mamprim, M. J., & Vulcano, L. C. (2020) · Anatomia Histologia Embryologia · doi:10.1111/ahe.12559 · Cited by 8
McElderry, R. M., Paxton, E. H., Nguyen, A. V., & Siers, S. R. (2022) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.2716 · Cited by 7
McFarland, A., Moresco, A., Han, S., Lombardi, C., & Johnson, J. G. (2023) · Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine · doi:10.1638/2021-0089 · Cited by 6
Clouded Leopards (Neofelis sp.): Biology and Conservation
Giordano, A. J. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-821139-7.00213-0 · Cited by 3
Bastard, J., Métras, R., & Durand, B. (2026) · Epidemiology and Infection · doi:10.1017/s0950268826101034 · Cited by 1
Tschirren, B., Pick, J. L., Hudson, D. W., Vedder, O., Postma, E., & Romero‐Haro, A. Á. (2026) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2025.2908 · Cited by 1
Officer, K., Webster, N., Rosenblatt, A. J., Sorphea, P., Warren, K. S., & Jackson, B. (2025) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2024.1460140
de Oliveira, V. M. M., & Pedro, V. D. A. S. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8695459/v1
Bastard, J., Migné, C. V., Helle, T., Agneray, E., Bigeard, C., Boudjadi, Y., Chevrier, M., Dumarest, M., Gondard, M., Martin‐Latil, S., et al. (2026) · Epidemics · doi:10.1016/j.epidem.2026.100923
Metadata
- Authors
- Che-Castaldo, J. P., Byrne, A., Perišin, K., & Faust, L. J.
- Affiliations
- Lincoln Park Zoo (US)
- Venue
- Scientific Data
- Published
- 2019-02-19
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 190019-190019
- ISSN
- 2052-4463 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6484356
- OpenAlex
- W2917264668
- Semantic Scholar
- 7e71e029abb5d5ed72985f2b8226728942fdbfbb
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
- Type
- data paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Scientific Data (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Institute of Museum and Library Services
- Arcus Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
- Keywords
- life expectancy, longevity, ex situ populations, captive animals, vertebrates, mammals, birds, amphibians, reptiles, survival analysis, maximum lifespan
- MeSH terms
- Amphibians, Animals, Animals, Zoo, Birds, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Life Expectancy, Male, Mammals, Reptiles, Sex Factors, Species Specificity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review