Cited by 28Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia TechniquesDental Health and Care UtilizationAnesthesia and Sedative Agents

The behaviour, social status and number of teeth extracted in children under general anaesthesia: A referral centre revisited

Hosey, M T, Bryce, J, Harris, P, McHugh, S, Campbell, C·2006·British Dental Journal

Abstract

Objective To report on the changing profile of children attending for Dental General Anaesthetic extractions (DGA) at the same centre in 1998 and again in 2004 compared to 1991.Design Prospective clinical.Setting Glasgow Dental Hospital DGA service during August 1999 and August/September 2004.Subjects and method Children presenting for DGA extractions. Data recorded: age, gender, number of teeth extracted and level of behaviour using the Frankl scale.Results In 1999: 190 children (97 boys) mean age five years. In 2004: 106 children (55 boys) mean age five years. There was a significant increase in the mean number of teeth extracted (p < 0.001), 4.2 (1-16) and 7.8 (1-17) in 1999 and 2004 respectively, compared to 3.7 in 1991. Twenty-six per cent of children had between six and 16 teeth extracted in 1999 compared to 74% in 2004. Significantly fewer children demonstrated "definitely positive" behaviour compared to 1991. Children were in the poorest socioeconomic groups, reflecting the geographic area.Conclusion Over half of the children were aged five years and under. Fewer highly co-operative children were treated. More teeth were extracted per child, suggesting that there should be greater opportunities to carry out restorations, not just extractions under general anaesthesia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.bdj.4813347

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hosey, M. T., Bryce, J., Harris, P., McHugh, S., & Campbell, C.
Affiliations
University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
Hosey, M T
Venue
British Dental Journal
Published
2006-03
Volume
200
Issue
6
Pages
331-334
ISSN
  • 0007-0610 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5373
OpenAlex
W2034418366
Cited by
28
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BDJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Keywords
dental general anaesthesia, tooth extraction, pediatric dental anesthesia, child behavior, Frankl scale, social status, socioeconomic deprivation, children under five, dental restorations, temporal trends
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Anesthesia, Dental, Anesthesia, General, Child, Child, Preschool, Cooperative Behavior, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Scotland, Socioeconomic Factors, Tooth Extraction, Sex Distribution, Dental Care for Children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review