The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In vitro and in vivo activity and cross resistance profiles of novel ruthenium (II) organometallic arene complexes in human ovarian cancer
Open accessAbstract
Ruthenium complexes offer the potential of reduced toxicity, a novel mechanism of action, non-cross resistance and a different spectrum of activity compared to platinum containing compounds. Thirteen novel ruthenium(II) organometallic arene complexes have been evaluated for activity (in vitro and in vivo) in models of human ovarian cancer, and cross-resistance profiles established in cisplatin and multi-drug-resistant variants. A broad range of IC50 values was obtained (0.5 to >100 microM) in A2780 parental cells with two compounds (RM175 and HC29) equipotent to carboplatin (6 microM), and the most active compound (HC11) equipotent to cisplatin (0.6 microM). Stable bi-dentate chelating ligands (ethylenediamine), a more hydrophobic arene ligand (tetrahydroanthracene) and a single ligand exchange centre (chloride) were associated with increased activity. None of the six active ruthenium(II) compounds were cross-resistant in the A2780cis cell line, demonstrated to be 10-fold resistant to cisplatin/carboplatin by a mechanism involving, at least in part, silencing of MLH1 protein expression via methylation. Varying degrees of cross-resistance were observed in the P-170 glycoprotein overexpressing multi-drug-resistant cell line 2780AD that could be reversed by co-treatment with verapamil. In vivo activity was established with RM175 in the A2780 xenograft together with non-cross-resistance in the A2780cis xenograft and a lack of activity in the 2780AD xenograft. High activity coupled to non cross-resistance in cisplatin resistant models merit further development of this novel group of anticancer compounds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Toward Multi-Targeted Platinum and Ruthenium Drugs—A New Paradigm in Cancer Drug Treatment Regimens?
Kenny, R. G., & Marmion, C. J. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00271 · Cited by 636
Using coordination chemistry to design new medicines
Ronconi, L., & Sadler, P. J. (2007) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2006.11.017 · Cited by 608
Self-citationBrunk, E., & Rothlisberger, U. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500628b · Cited by 494
The path for metal complexes to a DNA target
Komor, A. C., & Barton, J. K. (2013) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/c3cc00177f · Cited by 384
Organometallic Half-Sandwich Iridium Anticancer Complexes
Liu, Z., Habtemariam, A., Pizarro, A. M., Fletcher, S. A., Kisova, A., Vrana, O., Salassa, L., Bruijnincx, P. C. A., Clarkson, G. J., Brabec, V., et al. (2011) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm2000932 · Cited by 357
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Aird, R. E., Cummings, J., Ritchie, A. A., Muir, M., Morris, R. E., Chen, H., Sadler, P. J., & Jodrell, D. I.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1652-1657
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- OpenAlex
- W1964314803
- Cited by
- 582
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vitro and in vivo activity and cross resistance profiles of novel ruthenium (II) organometallic arene complexes in human ovarian cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600290
- The paper
- Aird, R. E., Cummings, J., Ritchie, A. A., Muir, M., Morris, R. E., Chen, H., Sadler, P. J., & Jodrell, D. I. (2002). In vitro and in vivo activity and cross resistance profiles of novel ruthenium (II) organometallic arene complexes in human ovarian cancer. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600290
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.