The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinomas predict for poorer survival compared to grade 3 endometrioid corpus cancers
Open accessAbstract
To compare the survival of women with uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) and clear cell carcinoma (CC) to those with grade 3 endometrioid uterine carcinoma (G3EC). Demographic, pathologic, treatment, and survival information were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program from 1988 to 2001. Data were analysed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression methods. Of 4180 women, 1473 had UPSC, 391 had CC, and 2316 had G3EC cancers. Uterine papillary serous carcinoma and CC patients were older (median age: 70 years and 68 vs 66 years, respectively; P<0.0001) and more likely to be black compared to G3EC (15 and 12% vs 7%; P<0.0001). A higher proportion of UPSC and CC patients had stage III-IV disease compared to G3EC patients (52 and 36% vs 29%; P<0.0001). Uterine papillary serous carcinoma, CC and G3EC patients represent 10, 3, and 15% of endometrial cancers but account for 39, 8, and 27% of cancer deaths, respectively. The 5-year disease-specific survivals for women with UPSC, CC and G3EC were 55, 68, and 77%, respectively (P<0.0001). The survival differences between UPSC, CC and G3EC persist after controlling for stage I-II (74, 82, and 86%; P<0.0001) and stage III-IV disease (33, 40, and 54; P<0.0001). On multivariate analysis, more favourable histology (G3EC), younger age, and earlier stage were independent predictors of improved survival. Women with UPSC and CC of the uterus have a significantly poorer prognosis compared to those with G3EC. These findings should be considered in the counselling, treating and designing of future trials for these high-risk patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
NIH Intramural Sequencing Center (NISC) Comparative Sequencing Program, Le Gallo, M., O'Hara, A. J., Rudd, M. L., Urick, M. E., Hansen, N. F., O'Neil, N. J., Price, J. C., Zhang, S., England, B. M., et al. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2455 · Cited by 419
Evaluation of DNA from the Papanicolaou test to detect ovarian and endometrial cancers.
Kinde, I., Bettegowda, C., Wang, Y., Wu, J., Agrawal, N., Shih, I.-M., Kurman, R., Dao, F., Levine, D. A., Giuntoli, R., et al. (2013) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3004952 · Cited by 327
Murali, R., Davidson, B., Fadare, O., Carlson, J. A., Crum, C. P., Gilks, C. B., Irving, J. A., Malpica, A., Matias-Guiu, X., McCluggage, W. G., et al. (2019) · International Journal of Gynecological Pathology · doi:10.1097/pgp.0000000000000491 · Cited by 278
Boruta, D. M., Gehrig, P. A., Fader, A. N., & Olawaiye, A. B. (2009) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.06.011 · Cited by 254
Management of women with clear cell endometrial cancer
Olawaiye, A. B., & Boruta, D. M. (2009) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.02.003 · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamilton, C. A., Cheung, M. K., Osann, K., Chen, L., Teng, N. N., Longacre, T. A., Powell, M. A., Hendrickson, M. R., Kapp, D. S., & Chan, J. K.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 2006-02-21
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 642-646
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- OpenAlex
- W2065949107
- Cited by
- 644
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinomas predict for poorer survival compared to grade 3 endometrioid corpus cancers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603012
- The paper
- Hamilton, C. A., Cheung, M. K., Osann, K., Chen, L., Teng, N. N., Longacre, T. A., Powell, M. A., Hendrickson, M. R., Kapp, D. S., & Chan, J. K. (2006). Uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinomas predict for poorer survival compared to grade 3 endometrioid corpus cancers. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.