The DOI matches its Crossref record.
HPV testing in primary screening of older women
Open accessAbstract
Certain types of the human papilloma virus (HPV) are well established as the primary cause of cervical cancer. Several studies have shown that HPV testing can improve the detection rate of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), but these have been carried out primarily in younger women. In this study we evaluated the role of HPV testing as an adjunct to cytology in women aged 35 or over. An additional aim was to evaluate commercially available kits for HPV testing. A total of 2988 eligible women aged 34 or more attending for a routine smear in 40 general practitioner practices received HPV testing in addition to routine cytology, after having given written informed consent. Samples were assayed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and two versions of the Hybrid Capture test for HPV, and women were invited for colposcopy if there was any cytological abnormality (including borderline smears) or the PCR test was positive. Any apparent abnormality was biopsied and loop-excision was performed as necessary. CIN was judged by histology; 42 women had high-grade CIN, of which six were cytology negative (86% sensitivity for borderline or worse) and three had a borderline smear (79% sensitivity for mild dyskaryosis or worse). The positive predictive value of a borderline smear was only 3.1%. Eleven high-grade lesions were negative by the PCR HPV test (sensitivity 74%). The first generation Hybrid Capture II test had a similar sensitivity but an unacceptably high false positive rate (18.3%), while the newer Hybrid Capture II microtitre kit had a 95% sensitivity and a 2.3% positivity rate in normal women when used at a 2 pg ml(-1) cut-off (positive predictive value 27%). Cytology performed very well in this older cohort of women. The newer Hybrid Capture II microtitre test may be a useful adjunct, especially if the results reported here are reproducible in other studies. A combined screening test offers the possibility of greater protection and/or longer screening intervals, which could reduce the overall cost of the screening programme.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
de Sanjosé, S., Diaz, M., Castellsagué, X., Clifford, G., Bruni, L., Muñoz, N., & Bosch, F. X. (2007) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(07)70158-5 · Cited by 1,669
Management of women who test positive for high-risk types of human papillomavirus: the HART study
Cuzick, J., Szarewski, A., Cubie, H., Hulman, G., Kitchener, H., Luesley, D., McGoogan, E., Menon, U., Terry, G., Edwards, R., et al. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14955-0 · Cited by 510
Self-citationCytology versus HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in the general population
Koliopoulos, G., Nyaga, V. N., Santesso, N., Bryant, A., Martin-Hirsch, P. P., Mustafa, R. A., Schünemann, H., Paraskevaidis, E., & Arbyn, M. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008587.pub2 · Cited by 494
Cervical cancer: epidemiology, prevention and the role of human papillomavirus infection.
(2001) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 463
Sankaranarayanan, R., Basu, P., Wesley, R. S., Mahe, C., Keita, N., Mbalawa, C. C. G., Sharma, R., Dolo, A., Shastri, S. S., Nacoulma, M., et al. (2004) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.20190 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Cuzick, J., Beverley, E., Ho, L., Terry, G., Sapper, H., Mielzynska, I., Lorincz, A., Chan, W.-K., Krausz, T., & Soutter, P.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 1999-09-10
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 554-558
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- OpenAlex
- W2087659731
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HPV testing in primary screening of older women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690730
- The paper
- Cuzick, J., Beverley, E., Ho, L., Terry, G., Sapper, H., Mielzynska, I., Lorincz, A., Chan, W.-K., Krausz, T., & Soutter, P. (1999). HPV testing in primary screening of older women. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690730
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.