Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 437

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 139 of the 139 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pharmacology of nociceptin and its receptor: a novel therapeutic target

Open access
Calo', Girolamo, Guerrini, Remo, Rizzi, Anna, Salvadori, Severo, Regoli, Domenico·2000·British Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

Nociceptin (NC), alias Orphanin FQ, has been recently identified as the endogenous ligand of the opioid receptor‐like 1 receptor (OP 4). This new NC/OP 4 receptor system belongs to the opioid family and has been characterized pharmacologically with functional and binding assays on native (mouse, rat, guinea‐pig) and recombinant (human) receptors, by using specific and selective agonists (NC, NC(1–13)NH 2) and a pure and competitive antagonist, [Nphe 1]NC(1–13)NH 2. The similar order of potency of agonists and affinity values of the antagonist indicate that the same receptor is present in the four species. OP 4 is expressed in neurons, where it reduces activation of adenylyl cyclase and Ca 2+ channels while activating K+ channels in a manner similar to opioids. In this way, OP 4 mediates inhibitory effects in the autonomic nervous system, but its activities in the central nervous system can be either similar or opposite to those of opioids. In vivo experiments have demonstrated that NC modulates a variety of biological functions ranging from nociception to food intake, from memory processes to cardiovascular and renal functions, from spontaneous locomotor activity to gastrointestinal motility, from anxiety to the control of neurotransmitter release at peripheral and central sites. These actions have been demonstrated using NC and various pharmacological tools, as antisense oligonucleotides targeting OP 4 or the peptide precursor genes, antibodies against NC, an OP 4 receptor selective antagonist and with data obtained from animals in which the receptor or the peptide precursor genes were knocked out. These new advances have contributed to better understanding of the pathophysiological role of the NC/OP 4 system, and ultimately will help to identify the therapeutic potential of new OP 4 receptor ligands. British Journal of Pharmacology (2000) 129, 1261–1283; doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0703219

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703219

Cites

139 of 139 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 139 references

Cited by

See all 437

Metadata

Authors
Calo', G., Guerrini, R., Rizzi, A., Salvadori, S., & Regoli, D.
Venue
British Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-04
Volume
129
Issue
7
Pages
1261-1283
ISSN
  • 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5381
OpenAlex
W2014237020
Cited by
437
References
139
FWCI
16.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pharmacology of nociceptin and its receptor: a novel therapeutic target. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.bjp.0703219
The paper
Calo', G., Guerrini, R., Rizzi, A., Salvadori, S., & Regoli, D. (2000). Pharmacology of nociceptin and its receptor: a novel therapeutic target. British Journal of Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0703219

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.