Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 240

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Gabapentin inhibits high‐threshold calcium channel currents in cultured rat dorsal root ganglion neurones

Open access
Sutton, K G, Martin, D J, Pinnock, R D, Lee, K, Scott, R H·2002·British Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

This study examined the action of gabapentin (gabapentin,1‐(aminomethyl) cyclohexane acetic acid (Neurontin®)) on voltage‐gated calcium (Ca 2+) channel influx recorded in cultured rat dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurones. Voltage‐gated Ca 2+ influx was monitored using both fura‐2 based fluorescence Ca 2+ imaging and the whole‐cell patch clamp technique. Imaging of intracellular Ca 2+ transients revealed that gabapentin inhibited KCl (30 m M)‐evoked voltage‐dependent Ca 2+ influx. Both the duration for 50% of the maximum response (W50) and total Ca 2+ influx were significantly reduced by ∼25‐30% in the presence of gabapentin (25 μ M). Gabapentin potently inhibited the peak whole‐cell Ca 2+ channel current (I Ba) in a dose‐dependent manner with an estimated IC 50 value of 167 n M. Block was incomplete and saturated at a maximal concentration of 25 μ M. Inhibition was significantly decreased in the presence of the neutral amino acid L‐isoleucine (25 μ M) but unaffected by application of the GABA B antagonist, saclofen (200 μ M), suggesting a direct action on the α 2 δ subunit of the Ca 2+ channel. Gabapentin inhibition was voltage‐dependent, producing an ∼7 mV hyperpolarizing shift in current voltage properties and reducing a non‐inactivating component of whole‐cell current activated at relatively depolarized potentials. The use of specific Ca 2+ channel antagonists revealed a mixed pharmacology of the gabapentin‐sensitive current (N‐, L‐ and P/Q‐type), which is dominated by N‐type current. The present study is the first to demonstrate that gabapentin directly mediates inhibition of voltage‐gated Ca 2+ influx in DRG neurones, providing a potential means for gabapentin to effectively mediate spinal anti‐nociception. British Journal of Pharmacology (2002) 135, 257–265; doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0704439

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704439

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 240

Metadata

Authors
Sutton, K. G., Martin, D. J., Pinnock, R. D., Lee, K., & Scott, R. H.
Venue
British Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-01
Volume
135
Issue
1
Pages
257-265
ISSN
  • 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5381
OpenAlex
W2099917325
Cited by
240
References
0
FWCI
6.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gabapentin inhibits high‐threshold calcium channel currents in cultured rat dorsal root ganglion neurones. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.bjp.0704439
The paper
Sutton, K. G., Martin, D. J., Pinnock, R. D., Lee, K., & Scott, R. H. (2002). Gabapentin inhibits high‐threshold calcium channel currents in cultured rat dorsal root ganglion neurones. British Journal of Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0704439

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.