The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of piperine, the pungent component of black pepper, at the human vanilloid receptor (TRPV1)
Open accessAbstract
We have characterised the effects of piperine, a pungent alkaloid found in black pepper, on the human vanilloid receptor TRPV1 using whole‐cell patch‐clamp electrophysiology. Piperine produced a clear agonist activity at the human TRPV1 receptor yielding rapidly activating whole‐cell currents that were antagonised by the competitive TRPV1 antagonist capsazepine and the non‐competitive TRPV1 blocker ruthenium red. The current–voltage relationship of piperine‐activated currents showed pronounced outward rectification (25±4‐fold between −70 and +70 mV) and a reversal potential of 0.0±0.4 mV, which was indistinguishable from that of the prototypical TRPV1 agonist capsaicin. Although piperine was a less potent agonist (EC 50=37.9±1.9 μM) than capsaicin (EC 50=0.29±0.05 μM), it demonstrated a much greater efficacy (approximately two‐fold) at TRPV1. This difference in efficacy did not appear to be related to the proton‐mediated regulation of the receptor since a similar degree of potentiation was observed for responses evoked by piperine (230±20%, n=11) or capsaicin (284±32%, n=8) upon acidification to pH 6.5. The effects of piperine upon receptor desensitisation were also unable to explain this effect since piperine resulted in more pronounced macroscopic desensitisation (t1/2=9.9±0.7 s) than capsaicin (t1/2>20 s) and also caused greater tachyphylaxis in response to repetitive agonist applications. Overall, our data suggest that the effects of piperine at human TRPV1 are similar to those of capsaicin except for its propensity to induce greater receptor desensitisation and, rather remarkably, exhibit a greater efficacy than capsaicin itself. These results may provide insight into the TRPV1‐mediated effects of piperine on gastrointestinal function. British Journal of Pharmacology (2005) 144, 781–790. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0706040
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ross, R. A., Gibson, T. M., Brockie, H. C., Leslie, M., Pashmi, G., Craib, S. J., Di Marzo, V., & Pertwee, R. G. (2001) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0703850 · Cited by 237 · cited 1×
“Similar findings have also been reported for anandamide and related analogues, PPAHV, and N-arachidonoyldopamine as determined by calcium imaging or calcium uptake (Jerman et al., 2000; Ross et al., 2001; Huang et al., 2002).”
Result
Cited by
Chemosensory properties of the trigeminal system
Viana, F. (2011) · ACS Chemical Neuroscience · doi:10.1021/cn100102c · Cited by 196
Yadav, V., Krishnan, A., & Vohora, D. (2020) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2019.112255 · Cited by 196
TRPV1 and Endocannabinoids: Emerging Molecular Signals that Modulate Mammalian Vision
Ryskamp, D., Redmon, S., Jo, A., & Križaj, D. (2014) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells3030914 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- McNamara, F. N., Randall, A., & Gunthorpe, M. J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 781-790
- ISSN
- 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5381
- OpenAlex
- W2017492367
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.