Cited by 44Mast cells and histamineNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesAllergic Rhinitis and Sensitization

Histamine receptors that influence blockage of the normal human nasal airway

Open access
Taylor‐Clark, Thomas, Sodha, Reena, Warner, Ben, Foreman, John·2005·British Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanisms by which histamine causes nasal blockage. Histamine, 40–800 μ g, intranasally into each nostril, induced significant blockage of the nasal airway in normal human subjects, as measured by acoustic rhinometry. Oral pretreatment with cetirizine, 5–30 mg, the H 1 antagonist, failed to reverse completely the nasal blockage induced by histamine, 400 μ g. Dimaprit, 50–200 μ g, the H 2 agonist, intranasally, caused nasal blockage, which was reversed by oral pretreatment with ranitidine, 75 mg, the H 2 antagonist. A combination of cetirizine, 20 mg, and ranitidine, 75 mg, caused greater inhibition of the nasal blockage caused by histamine, 400 μ g, than cetirizine alone. In the presence of both antagonists, there was residual histamine‐induced nasal blockage. R‐α‐methylhistamine (R‐α‐MeH), 100–600 μ g, the H 3 agonist, intranasally, caused nasal blockage, which was not inhibited by either cetirizine or ranitidine. Thioperamide, 700 μ g, the H 3 antagonist, intranasally, reversed the R‐α‐MeH‐induced nasal blockage. Thioperamide alone had no significant action on the nasal blockage induced by histamine, 400 and 1000 μ g, but, in the presence of cetirizine, 20 mg, thioperamide further reduced the histamine‐induced nasal blockage. Corynanthine, 2 mg, the α1‐adrenoceptor antagonist, administered intranasally, caused nasal blockage. Corynanthine produced a greater increase in nasal blockage when in combination with bradykinin compared to its combination with R‐α‐MeH. There appears to be a contribution of H 1, H 2 and H 3 receptors to histamine‐induced nasal blockage in normal human subjects. The sympathetic nervous system actively maintains nasal patency and we suggest that activation of nasal H 3 receptors may downregulate sympathetic activity. British Journal of Pharmacology (2005) 144, 867–874. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0706118

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706118

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The objective findings of improved nasal airway resistance suggest that the H2 histamine receptor modulates nasal tissue response to histamine.

    “The objective findings of improved nasal airway resistance suggest that the H2 histamine receptor does modulate nasal tissue response to histamine.1193-1195”

    From International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (2018) · cites this paper as [1194]

    The Results and Discussion report that ranitidine reduced histamine-induced nasal blockage in one experiment, supporting a possible H2 role, but its effects were variable across experiments. The Measurement of nasal patency section says the objective measure was minimum nasal cross-sectional area by acoustic rhinometry, not nasal airway resistance. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taylor‐Clark, T., Sodha, R., Warner, B., & Foreman, J.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Foreman, John
Venue
British Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-03
Volume
144
Issue
6
Pages
867-874
ISSN
  • 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5381
OpenAlex
W2070207130
Cited by
44
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Mast cells and histamine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
Keywords
histamine receptors, nasal obstruction, histamine H1 receptor, histamine H2 receptor, histamine H3 receptor, alpha1-adrenoceptors, nasal patency, sympathetic nervous system, cetirizine, ranitidine, thioperamide, corynanthine, bradykinin, alpha-methylhistamine, acoustic rhinometry
MeSH terms
Adult, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Interactions, Histamine, Histamine Antagonists, Humans, Methylhistamines, Middle Aged, Nasal Cavity, Ranitidine, Receptors, Histamine, Time Factors, Nasal Obstruction, Cetirizine, Histamine Agonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review