The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Muscarinic receptor subtypes in human bladder detrusor and mucosa, studied by radioligand binding and quantitative competitive RT–PCR: changes in ageing
Open accessAbstract
We investigated muscarinic receptors in the detrusor and mucosa of the human bladder body. Radioligand‐binding studies with [3 H]QNB were conducted using specimens collected from patients (36–77 years) with normal bladder function, undergoing surgery. For RT–PCR, biopsies of normal bladder were obtained from patients (30–88 years) undergoing check cystoscopy. Binding of [3 H]QNB in detrusor (n=20) was of high affinity (KD 77.1 (55.2–99.0) p M) and capacity (Bmax 181±7 fmol mg protein−1). Similar values were obtained in mucosa (n=6) (KD 100.5 (41.2–159.9) p M; Bmax 145±9 fmol mg protein−1). Competition‐binding experiments in detrusor membranes with muscarinic receptor antagonists including trospium, darifenacin, 4‐DAMP, methoctramine, AQ‐RA 741, AF‐DX 116 and pirenzepine indicated a receptor population of 71% M 2, 22% M 3 and 7% M 1. In the mucosa, 75% of sites were M 2 receptors, with 25% M 3/M 5. Using RT–PCR, expression of M 1, M 2, M 3 and M 5 mRNA was demonstrated in both detrusor and mucosa. The presence of a high density of mainly M 2 muscarinic receptors in the mucosa appears to be a novel finding and raises the question of their physiological significance and the source of their endogenous ligand. There was a negative correlation of receptor number (Bmax) with age in detrusor muscle from male patients (P=0.02). Quantitative competitive RT–PCR demonstrated a selective age‐related decrease in mRNA for muscarinic M 3 but not M 2 receptors, in both male (P<0.0001) and female (P=0.019) detrusor. These findings correspond with reports of decreased detrusor contractility with ageing. British Journal of Pharmacology (2005) 144, 1089–1099. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0706147
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Birder, L., & Andersson, K.-E. (2013) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00030.2012 · Cited by 438
Hotta, H., & Uchida, S. (2010) · Geriatrics & Gerontology International · doi:10.1111/j.1447-0594.2010.00592.x · Cited by 154
Soukup, O., Winder, M., Killi, U. K., Wsol, V., Jun, D., Kuca, K., & Tobin, G. (2017) · Current Neuropharmacology · doi:10.2174/1570159x14666160607212615 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Mansfield, K. J., Liu, L., Mitchelson, F. J., Moore, K. H., Millard, R. J., & Burcher, E.
- Venue
- British Journal of Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1089-1099
- ISSN
- 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5381
- OpenAlex
- W2062212949
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Muscarinic receptor subtypes in human bladder detrusor and mucosa, studied by radioligand binding and quantitative competitive RT–PCR: changes in ageing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.bjp.0706147
- The paper
- Mansfield, K. J., Liu, L., Mitchelson, F. J., Moore, K. H., Millard, R. J., & Burcher, E. (2005). Muscarinic receptor subtypes in human bladder detrusor and mucosa, studied by radioligand binding and quantitative competitive RT–PCR: changes in ageing. British Journal of Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0706147
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.